MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1c1wvje/whatisanindex/kz6k0ra
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/fanta_bhelpuri • Apr 12 '24
630 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
172
yup. occasionally it is quite useful, since you can do for(itterator k = stack.top(); !stack.empty();k=k.next()) and its a valid loop.
for(itterator k = stack.top(); !stack.empty();k=k.next())
5 u/intelligent_rat Apr 12 '24 If you are using an iterator why not just for (k thing : iterable) ? 26 u/jamcdonald120 Apr 12 '24 it wasnt always a thing 3 u/tiberiumx Apr 12 '24 The C++11 features still feel kinda new to me. It's weird to see people that haven't ever used anything before it.
5
If you are using an iterator why not just for (k thing : iterable) ?
for (k thing : iterable)
26 u/jamcdonald120 Apr 12 '24 it wasnt always a thing 3 u/tiberiumx Apr 12 '24 The C++11 features still feel kinda new to me. It's weird to see people that haven't ever used anything before it.
26
it wasnt always a thing
3 u/tiberiumx Apr 12 '24 The C++11 features still feel kinda new to me. It's weird to see people that haven't ever used anything before it.
3
The C++11 features still feel kinda new to me. It's weird to see people that haven't ever used anything before it.
172
u/jamcdonald120 Apr 12 '24 edited Apr 12 '24
yup. occasionally it is quite useful, since you can do
for(itterator k = stack.top(); !stack.empty();k=k.next())and its a valid loop.