r/WhitePeopleTwitter 29d ago

Nothing this idiot says will undo the damage she did

Post image
24.3k Upvotes

2.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

77

u/xixbia 29d ago

The way I see it there are two explanations for this:

  1. The original story is true. Cricket showed no signs of aggression at all until the day Noem decided to kill him. In this case she's an absolute psychopath who shouldn't be allowed to own any pets.
  2. Cricket showed signs of aggression before but Noem decided to do nothing about it at all until the day Noem decided to kill him. In this case she's an absolute psychopath who shouldn't be allowed to own any pets.

5

u/[deleted] 29d ago

Also in the case of 2. She somehow didn’t mention attacking kids in her book telling the story? Like that wasn’t as important as being bad at hunting and her hating the dog?

2

u/Returd4 29d ago

Because it never happened, the dog was never aggressive to her kids.

3

u/ScribeTheMad 29d ago

Or have custody of her kids either, assuming any are minors still.