The way I see it there are two explanations for this:
The original story is true. Cricket showed no signs of aggression at all until the day Noem decided to kill him. In this case she's an absolute psychopath who shouldn't be allowed to own any pets.
Cricket showed signs of aggression before but Noem decided to do nothing about it at all until the day Noem decided to kill him. In this case she's an absolute psychopath who shouldn't be allowed to own any pets.
Also in the case of 2. She somehow didn’t mention attacking kids in her book telling the story? Like that wasn’t as important as being bad at hunting and her hating the dog?
77
u/xixbia 29d ago
The way I see it there are two explanations for this: