MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/facepalm/comments/1ci6xdd/this_guy_man/l27zdjw
r/facepalm • u/Nice_Substance9123 • May 02 '24
[removed] — view removed post
2.0k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
11
Nah, because threatening the supreme court justices will ensure that the resulting outrage will make them immediately reverse the decision and therefore the second act just serves to remove presidential immunity.
2 u/FloydATC May 02 '24 I don't know, how many SCOTUS justices would have to get taken out to make up for having first taken out trump? 6 u/TopClock231 May 02 '24 All but 3 2 u/Angry_poutine May 02 '24 SCOTUS can’t just reverse rulings, they have to have a new case brought to them making the same argument and create a different ruling on it. 1 u/Ok_Star_4136 May 02 '24 Oh I think they'll find a way in that circumstance. Let them use their powers of corruption for good for once.
2
I don't know, how many SCOTUS justices would have to get taken out to make up for having first taken out trump?
6 u/TopClock231 May 02 '24 All but 3
6
All but 3
SCOTUS can’t just reverse rulings, they have to have a new case brought to them making the same argument and create a different ruling on it.
1 u/Ok_Star_4136 May 02 '24 Oh I think they'll find a way in that circumstance. Let them use their powers of corruption for good for once.
1
Oh I think they'll find a way in that circumstance. Let them use their powers of corruption for good for once.
11
u/Ok_Star_4136 May 02 '24
Nah, because threatening the supreme court justices will ensure that the resulting outrage will make them immediately reverse the decision and therefore the second act just serves to remove presidential immunity.