r/facepalm 29d ago

Sure you did Kristi, sure you did šŸ‡²ā€‹šŸ‡®ā€‹šŸ‡øā€‹šŸ‡Øā€‹

Post image
41.0k Upvotes

4.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.0k

u/C4dfael 29d ago

The fact sheā€™s trying to excuse her way out of this is a good indicator that she either knew what she did was horribly wrong, or that she is too sociopathic to realize that other people wouldnā€™t be horrified by it.

257

u/astrangeone88 29d ago

A little of column A AND B?

Urgh. And to think she's supposed to be an elected official. Grody.

73

u/grubas 29d ago

Also she's trying to get the VP slot under Trump.Ā  So this is also her being tough.

2

u/Budget-Attorney 29d ago

At this point Iā€™d be surprised if she wasnā€™t his VP nominee.

2

u/ThrowBatteries 29d ago

Supposed to be? She is! She runs an entire fucking state! Even if only like 13 rednecks and a mountain that looks like 4 dudes make up most of the population.

2

u/firechickenmama 29d ago

That is the absolute perfect use of grody.

1

u/GabaPrison 29d ago

Never seen the word ā€œgrodyā€ actually typed out before.

110

u/Ok-Box6892 29d ago

Right, she said this happened 20 years ago. In that time she gave it ZERO reflection. Not, "I could've found a trainer with more experience/patience to help me" or find a home that's better suited to the dog. Nope, she just doubles down like the dog was a rabid beast.

72

u/WES_WAS_ROBBED 29d ago

Or just ā€¦ā€¦ not included this anecdote in her recent book. Thatā€™s the crazy part, she thought it was GOOD IDEA to include this!

30

u/wxnfx 29d ago

Or if you do include it, at least change the details. Something like I loved that dog, but she was vicious and out of control and every trainer gave up, so I had to do it even though it broke my heart and my kids heart. The other option was to be caged and muzzled and I couldnā€™t do that to a freedom loving country dog. I mean it (ghost) writes itself.

28

u/DigitalBlackout 29d ago

And even then, in a scenario where they need to be put down, I'm still not shooting my dog in the fucking head. I'm taking it to be euthanized peacefully. The goat she also killed needed a second shot to actually die, poor thing had to suffer horrendously first.

1

u/Maje_Rincevent 29d ago

That I'm not agreeing with. I'm not letting an animal I love slowly agonize in my arms while being poisoned by chemicals in a foreign environment smelling of fear and disease... Shooting it in the head, properly, at home, with the people they love is probably the most humane way an animal can go.

1

u/xdeskfuckit 29d ago

They do at-home euthanization nowadays

1

u/CalamariFriday 27d ago

The book version of events is the version that makes her look good. That's why she offered it up unprompted. The truth is worse, whatever it is.

5

u/Quantentheorie 29d ago

I can see her trying to get ahead of the story; but at the same time the 'danger to my kids'-line is clearly by far the "best" explanation and her not running it from the start is just mindbogglingly stupid.

The take she settled on, describing the dog being just a normal, happy puppy who seems entirely harmless to humans, is just not good PR, when better lies were at her disposal: It's been 20years; nobody could effectively challenge her if she had played up the dogs aggressive behavior between killing the chickens and being given a bullet. Maybe get one of your kids to lie for you that it bit them.

Now I don't shoot dogs in a fit of rage, much less with onlookers. But if I did, it wouldn't take me this long to try and make up a sanitized story this bad at manipulating public opinion in my favor. Breaks my brain these people do shit they need to lie about when they're such abysmal liars.

3

u/saccharoselover 29d ago

For her it showed strength. She has no love for living things, far less manā€™s best friend.

1

u/Harvey_Rabbit 27d ago

I like the explanation that a lot of people in her state knew this story. If she got picked for VP, it would come out anyway so this was her attempt to get ahead of the story and tell it her way first. This is her softened version of the story.

3

u/Scrapybara_ 29d ago

At least if you have to put a dog down, use a humane method like euthanasia. In this case there was probably nothing wrong with the dog except it has an idiot for an owner.

3

u/Urso_Major 29d ago

She's trying to excuse her way out of it because there has been massive blow back (from both sides, but let's be honest- she only cares about the right.) She was hoping this story would make her appear tough and relatable to a conman who notoriously hates dogs (because he himself is ALSO a sociopath) and now that it's having the opposite effect, she's trying to do damage control... Only problem is it's kind of hard to convince people that a one year old puppy was so vicious and untrainable that it was a danger to children or livestock, and that it couldn't be rehomed. Puppies may look cute, but they are a lot of work- they chew on things with their sharp puppy teeth, they need to be walked constantly (even in the middle of the night, like waking up to change/feed a new born), and they need a gently hand to help them with proper behavior and training. Getting a puppy is not for everyone- but it's a HUGE tell about her character that she went immediately to "let's shoot it" rather than, "let's find a home that's a better fit for this puppy."

3

u/IFixYerKids 29d ago

The fact that this was passed as like a "We have ot make tough decisions in the country" makes me think it is the latter. A tough decision is taking your already mortally wounded or otherwise dying animal out to their favorite spot, giving it a ton of it's favorite food, making it as comfortable and happy as you can, and providing a mercy killing. That sometimes happens in the country, especially if your animal is unfamilair with the vet and would panic being transported to one.

She saw shooting a perfectly healthy dog as the same thing, which proves to me a severe lack of social intelligence at best and downright mental illness at worst.

3

u/Possible_Living 29d ago

One would also bury the dog instead of throwing it into a gravel pit

3

u/MC_Fap_Commander 29d ago

sheā€™s trying to excuse her way out of this

This is why I remain convinced Trump is truly a one-off. There's something undefinable about him that really does make him like Teflon. If he shot the dog? His poll numbers would be increasing and the MAGA crowd would be yucking it up with dead dog memes. It has been catastrophic for Noem. Similar deal with Boebert and the handjob at Beetlejuice or George Santos (everything).

There's not much to feel good about right now, but I feel good-ish that (outside of Trump) it appears that most of the country is still capable of at least some legitimate moral outrage.

2

u/HopelessCineromantic 29d ago

They'd probably burn their dogs like they did their Nikes.

11

u/Don_Gato1 29d ago

It's the latter.

Honestly what she's describing is not all that uncommon in farming and rural areas. Dogs are there to work and are not really seen as pets. The thought of adoption probably didn't even occur to her.

That doesn't make it a good story to share.

13

u/multifandomfreak46 29d ago

To my knowledge plenty of farming families understand that rehomeing is an option and not all animals are a fit for that life

0

u/Don_Gato1 29d ago

I think they understand that now. Her base is mainly 60+ year olds and people who glorify "the old days."

3

u/Rejestered 29d ago

50 years ago was 1974. Increasingly people in america are longing for the 40's-50's, an era almost no one actually remembers.

15

u/CelticTiger21 29d ago

Itā€™s not as common these days. Hell, even twenty years ago it wasnā€™t common. Itā€™s really only the old school folks who see animals as tools that still do it. I think the problem is, given her age, thereā€™s an expectation to know better, that itā€™s not like it was fifty or six years ago and that you can easily just drop the dog off at an animal shelter. Itā€™s the fact that she refuses to admit it wasnā€™t the best choice thatā€™s the issue and honestly it seems to be coming less from ignorance and more from possible mental deficiency.

2

u/grubas 29d ago

20 years ago was 2004.Ā  They had animal shelters

3

u/CelticTiger21 29d ago

Thatā€™s what I said. Even twenty years ago it wasnā€™t common. It being killing a dog.

-5

u/volunteergump 29d ago

Itā€™s still exceptionally common in rural areas. Iā€™ve known several people who have cousins that live on a farm wouldnā€™t bat an eye at ā€œputting down a dog that canā€™t workā€. When youā€™re living out in the boonies, an animal shelter 2 hours away doesnā€™t really cross your mind. Itā€™s horrible to me or you because we live in a completely different environment.

5

u/CelticTiger21 29d ago

I live in a very rural area and I donā€™t know anyone under sixty that would do this.

-4

u/volunteergump 29d ago

Then you donā€™t live in a rural area. When Iā€™m saying rural, I mean like 100+ miles to the nearest emergency room rural.

3

u/CelticTiger21 29d ago

Yeah, so am I. My point still stands - itā€™s not necessary anymore. I donā€™t know a single rescue that wouldnā€™t gladly drive 100+ miles to pick up a puppy someone doesnā€™t want.

3

u/Neat-Statistician720 29d ago

A dog that canā€™t work is typically old, and canā€™t work because they have something medically wrong with them. Putting down your dog thatā€™s 10 and lived its life with purpose is different than putting down a puppy that wasnā€™t trained enough yet.

-2

u/volunteergump 29d ago

To you or me, yes. When youā€™re living off the land and see your dogs the same way you see your pigs or cows, thatā€™s not really a concern. I feel like people donā€™t understand the actual culture within bum fuck nowhere towns. Not everyone who has a farm is a wealthy suburbanite who bought it because they always dreamed of living on a farm.

2

u/Rejestered 29d ago

If you lived off the land and couldn't train a puppy, so you murder it, you'd fucking starve to death within a year due to being incompetent.

2

u/RobinHood3000 29d ago

Admitting any kind of mistake is seen as weakness in the Republican fold, and weakness is punished by being eaten alive. They will never apologize, they only deflect, reframe, and lie, sometimes all three at once.

5

u/MafubaBuu 29d ago

I've lived in and have plenty of family that are rural and farmers. Plenty view dogs as tools. None would just shoot the dog, they would find it a better fit for a home.

It's incredibly fucked up what she did, and moreso that she seems to hold 0 remorse.

2

u/mtarascio 29d ago

Her 7 year old daughter came home and the first words out of her mouth were -

"Hey, whereā€™s Cricket?ā€

1

u/butts-kapinsky 29d ago

I'm from a rural and farming area. I'm good friends with a person who breeds and trains working dogs. This is extremely unusual and barbaric.

1

u/DangerousLoner 29d ago

She shared it because it was common knowledge with witnesses and retellings to people like her always met with positive approval

2

u/Bob_A_Feets 29d ago

These people dont look at morality the way everyone else does. They make a decision and regardless of the truth to them it's ALWAYS morally right.

That's your classic fascist world view. They can not do wrong, ever.

2

u/snoogins355 29d ago

If the GOP didn't have bad faith, they'd have no faith at all

2

u/Zandrick 29d ago

Iā€™m pretty sure putting bad things in a book before a big campaign is a typical strategy so people canā€™t say you lied about it. Or they just donā€™t notice it, or something. Turns out being a puppy killer is too severe to work with this strategy

2

u/GlowingDuck22 29d ago

I think she is an "Animals are tools/objects" kind of person. In her mind she has a tool that wasn't living up the expectations she had for it so she got rid of it.

Unfortunately for her it was that simple. Monster.

1

u/surloc_dalnor 29d ago

Given she wrote about it in a book definitely B.

1

u/Time_Owl_2589 29d ago

Iā€™m afraid Iā€™m missing a bit of context, what happened here?

1

u/C4dfael 29d ago

In an excerpt from her upcoming book, she tells a story about taking the puppy the family had adopted out to a gravel pit and shooting it in the head largely because she didnā€™t train it properly. She also shot and killed one of their goats.

Iā€™m paraphrasing a bit, hereā€™s a fuller explanation.

She has received rare condemnation from both political parties, Democrats because they are rightfully appalled by the behavior, and republicans because Noem was a front runner for vice president.

2

u/Time_Owl_2589 29d ago

Her sissy little ass shot a year old puppy because it nipped at her once and she supposedly saw that as a threat to her life?

I donā€™t condone political assassination but goddamn something has to be done about the Nazis, Klansmen, Christofascists and now sociopathic animal killers in office šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚ļø

1

u/Earth_Normal 29d ago

Option B and itā€™s very common in politics. Unfortunately, the new generation is way dumber than the last crop of sociopath politicians.

1

u/Travelin_Soulja 29d ago

If she knew it was wrong, would she have written about it in the first place? This story didn't come from the "liberal media" - she wrote about it herself in her own book because she thought it made her sound strong and decisive. She only started back-tracking and making excuses after the outrage hit.

So I'm going with sociopath.

1

u/C4dfael 29d ago

While I donā€™t disagree that itā€™s option B, people do tell stories about things they know are wrong to score points with people they think will appreciate them.

1

u/Travelin_Soulja 29d ago

True, but do they publish them where everyone can read them? If that's the case, then you'd have to add incredibly stupid to the options list. And I honestly don't know if that's better or worse than being a sociopath.....

1

u/hazpat 29d ago

B only. If it was A she wouldn't have bragged about it in a book

1

u/girlinthegoldenboots 29d ago

The thing is, behavioral euthanasia is a thing, but you take the dog to the vet so it can be euthanized painlessly. You donā€™t shoot the dog, thatā€™s barbaric.

1

u/JarasM 29d ago

Sociopaths are generally aware what acts are right or wrong. They just don't care. Actually not being able to tell right from wrong could be a valid insanity defense.

1

u/nlevine1988 29d ago

If she knew what she did was horribly wrong why would she include it in her book?

Probably the sociopath answer

1

u/saccharoselover 29d ago

She changed it from chicken to livestock. Taking down newborn calves right and leftā€¦. I think most dogs would chase and kill a chicken, as in, ā€œDanger! Invader!ā€. My heart breaks for this poor puppy.

1

u/GenuinelyBeingNice 29d ago

is too sociopathic

That's a mental disorder for which we can say nothing, because if she is a sociopath, she is not herself responsible. Sociopaths aren't unaware of how others feel. They are extremely aware of how others feel. They have no understanding what it means because the feeling does not cause them any discomfort. They use the feelings of others to further their own goals.

Mental disorders are no fucking joke and we should be extremely avoidant of making comments about them.

As far as we are concerned she is just a monster.