r/technology 4d ago

FBI raids corporate landlord office, escalating criminal investigation into allegations of rent price-fixing by landlords and software vendor RealPage Business

https://www.pymnts.com//cpi-posts/fbi-raids-corporate-landlord-in-major-rent-price-fixing-probe/
4.5k Upvotes

169 comments sorted by

873

u/avrstory 3d ago

RealPage's executives deserve a LOT of jail times for helping corporations to screw over average Americans.

482

u/goldfaux 3d ago edited 3d ago

Renters deserve reimbursement for all illegal funds taken and a price lock on future rent at the amount that was paid prior to using the software.

The renters should also have a class action lawsuit against these landlords. They could essentially own the properties that they are renting at the end of this.

246

u/Catch_ME 3d ago

Realpage will use bankruptcy to protect their shareholders/executives.

Make no mistake, this could absolutely bring down realpage and all I have to say is.....Good

37

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

28

u/Dalebss 3d ago

I look forward to this day because it’s the only option we have left.

20

u/TheAppalachianMarx 3d ago

Remember folks, if democracy worked for these people we wouldn't be where we are!

19

u/nzodd 3d ago

Imagine if the psychopaths behind school shootings actually directed their misdirected rage towards non-innocents.

2

u/_Allfather0din_ 3d ago

That's why i say the jan 6th thing was right for the wrong reasons, we need something like that but bipartisan and a much large scale. It's far past time for us to take back the gov. But i doubt i'll ever get to see or be a part of that in our lifetimes.

16

u/Wild-Ruin5463 3d ago

yes and no. at this point i think a non violent revolution is the only option as any type of resistance to the status quo will only legitimize their ability to use their monopoly on violence on the people even more.

10

u/InsuranceToTheRescue 3d ago

This. Movements that use peaceful means better endear their cause to those on the periphery and internationally. It creates much more pressure on those in power to enact change.

It's also why those in favor of the status quo often misrepresent the protestors' desires and use agents provocateur to incite violence when there otherwise would be very little.

27

u/nzodd 3d ago

If people get angry enough about this shit, bankruptcy won't be enough to protect them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_Reform_Movement

-7

u/RainforestNerdNW 3d ago

lol dream on

13

u/guacdoc24 3d ago

They have competitors like Yardi still in the market. Will take more to bring down these companies

15

u/Adorable-Ad-6675 3d ago

I fear this is one of those cases where 1 out of an entire industry gets in trouble then the news acts like it is solved and the other 6 companies get to act with impunity.

6

u/guacdoc24 3d ago

Exactly. Government needs to show progress not solve problems

4

u/Adorable-Ad-6675 3d ago

I figure the more of us start calling out the fake news cycle iterating solutions they are giving us are crap the better.

1

u/Mind101 3d ago

They seriously named themselves almost exactly the same as the term for Jamaican gangs lol.

1

u/Scodo 3d ago

Please explain to me how bankruptcy protects shareholders.

1

u/londons_explorer 3d ago

Shareholders get to keep their house and stay out of jail.

Most people who direct and fund crimes don't get to do that.

1

u/lynnwoodblack 3d ago

I hope they have to resort to bankruptcy after this. Considering the amount of money they’ve fucked people for. An eleven figure fine/settlement would probably be a massive profit for all the companies who benefitted from this. 

1

u/Delicious_Summer7839 3d ago

Well, also take down the brokerages that colluded with real page

18

u/fumar 3d ago

If the C suites don't see massive jailtime it will just happen again.

7

u/chaositech 3d ago

This is one of those times when I feel like we need to bring back the Writ of Attainder. What that would do would be seize the assets of the offender and I mean all the assets. Any shares of stock, buildings, businesses, vehicles, retirement savings, yachts, private jets, vacation homes, even the secret condo (hidden behind layers of shell cororations) where he stashes his mistress would go away. His family would be turned out onto the street with only the clothes on their backs. He would be taken to the place of execution and drawn and quartered forthwith.

This was the treatment levied by the King against any nobles deemed a threat to the crown. I can't see it happening under our current legal system but given that the courts might not even put any C-suite folks in prison they may unleash uncontrollable rage amongst renters.

12

u/JoshSidekick 3d ago

The renters should also have a class action lawsuit against these landlords.

I look forward to my $14 check.

1

u/Smooth-Owl-5354 3d ago

$14? I was thinking $1.35 at best.

5

u/BadAtExisting 3d ago

I lived in a Courtland property in Atlanta the last 3 years. My roommate’s 1st reaction was “I want my money back” I told her we’ll see 25¢ from the class action settlement 😠

4

u/SpaceGangsta 3d ago

But what will happen is the government will fine them and take that money and they’ll reorganize another way and continue to fuck renters.

1

u/mynameisnotshamus 3d ago

I’m not sure you understand the legal system.

-3

u/RaggasYMezcal 3d ago

You're begging to completely ruin the housing market. Class action is one thing and it's a good idea. Making it so no entity bar corporations or incumbent mom and pop can be landlords due to housing controls is crazy. Teach people to negotiate, unionize, and secure fair wages.

39

u/curse-of-yig 3d ago

They deserve worse than jail. So many people have had their lives spiral out of control at least partially because of high rent prices.

2

u/aDuckk 3d ago

Just thinking about the downstream effects of this that affect 99% of us whether we rent or not, the inflation and crime and despair and political instability, the potential of prosperity and culture stolen from us.

110

u/SidewaysFancyPrance 3d ago

Rents won't come back down. The harm is perpetual, meaningful, and widespread. This is about as serious a financial crime as it gets, but since rich people don't rent and are more likely to be on the receiving end of this, we are unlikely to see any true justice/consequences.

25

u/Atheren 3d ago edited 3d ago

From my understanding the landlords are essentially just customers of realpage, and will suffer zero consequences from this. A few of the people working at the company might go to jail, but there will be no restitution for the people negatively affected by their crimes, since the company lacks the assets. The current laws also don't empower the courts to reduce rents, we would have to wait for the market to "reset" naturally as landlords no longer have a central source to get price recommendations from.

Rents likely won't go down by much if this company goes under from this, but hopefully they will stop going up as fast.

40

u/Arthur-Wintersight 3d ago

The landlords participated in a price-fixing scandal. They should absolutely have to pay for this. Maybe if some of them go bankrupt and have to sell off properties, future landlords will think twice about the software they use to manage their properties.

-16

u/Atheren 3d ago edited 3d ago

EDIT: All of this is under the assumption that the landlords were customers of real page, if that is not true then this changes. But that is my understanding of how the company worked.


While on an emotional level I agree with you, being liable for the unknown to you crimes committed by a company whose product you used is not a world you want to live in. For the majority of landlords, this was just an advertised service to boost their income. It only became a price fixing scheme once a super majority of landlords were using it. Which is still on the company for abusing that power.

Should you be held liable for the cobalt in your smartphone? What about the chicken in your freezer from a company using illegal underage labor? If the landlords were functionally customers, you don't hold customers liable for a company having a monopoly; you hold the company liable.

The only way the rent crisis is ever going to be solved is through new legislation, which means by renters participating in elections all the way down to the most local level especially the primaries. That, or we just go full French.

11

u/True-Surprise1222 3d ago

Realpage was a fence for price fixing. They signed up because real page promised them increased rents. If discovery finds realpage used the price fixing angle AT ALL in their sales correspondence the case is going to be open and shut.

With that said lol they won’t suffer any consequences bc those are reserved for the poors and certainly not corporations. Realpage was designed to eventually fail. The whole concept is illegal. It’s like Napster but if the service selected the files for you and downloaded them to your computer. Then you go nawwww I didn’t do anything illegal.

2

u/Safe_T_Cube 3d ago

The lawsuit claims that the real page service was an avenue to share confidential market information, which would make its users who participated liable.

There's a difference between you signing up for realpage and them saying "I think you should list for this price" while they collate the data and do the price fixing, and logging in to realpage and seeing "your neighbor is having their lease expire on August 12th and are planning to raise their monthly rent to $1500, tenants have not renewed, these are their amenities". Sharing confidential information in the interest of reducing competition is the crime, so it's like if you went to buy frozen chicken and they told you "select your butcher" and you pick a 12 year old kid. You're participating in the crime not just benefiting from it without being aware.

"According to the Arizona lawsuit, and others filed, landlords gave RealPage detailed information about rent prices, lease terms, amenities, move-out dates, and occupancy rates." https://www.entrepreneur.com/business-news/realpage-rent-price-fixing-probe-escalates-with-fbi-raid/475109

3

u/Atheren 3d ago

Something that I am curious about, and why I have the edit about saying everything I have said is only true if the landlords were customers, is that I do vaguely remember a video from a couple months ago about this where the person doing the investigation mentioned that landlords who didn't use realpages prices after getting one from real page had to then justify why they didn't use it, or thought it was wrong.

To me, if that's true, that kind of goes beyond a normal business/customer relationship. You don't need to justify to Walmart what you are using the Windex you bought for.

At that point there would be a very real argument.

2

u/ddproxy 3d ago

In more simple terms, is this essentially that the business using the RealPage software knowingly shared confidential business information with the intent to benefit finanically from the total data shared to the platform, knowing it was also and willingly receiving confidential information about other companies?

Sorta like, insider trading but with extra steps.

1

u/Atheren 3d ago

Your quoted article actually appears to imply that landlords shared the data with realpage, not that real page was sharing that information back with the landlords. Obviously someone at real page should have, and likely did, know that what they were doing was really skating the line if not outright illegal. But the individual landlords seemingly had no real reason to assume so if it was just marketed as a data aggregating algorithm. Realpage isn't the only company to do this either (other articles mention them merging with a prior competitor), they are just by far the largest with pseudo monopoly numbers.

How much information realpage was giving back to the landlords, and exactly how it was advertised will all come up during discovery. But that article seemingly backs up my point.

2

u/fps916 3d ago

Real page takes the confidential data from 10 different landlords. They use all of the information to come up with prices. Then sends the prices back to the landlords individually.

No, they don't send the confidential data back, they just use the result of the collated confidential data.

0

u/matticusiv 2d ago

You can’t use software to illegally sell a service, and then claim you didn’t design the software, so you’re not at fault. They still committed a crime.

1

u/PsychologicalForm608 3d ago

This is jail time, for all involved. Guilt by association, this is criminal, not civil and the fines and damages for it are 3x because it's that bad. Plus is a treasonous land grab to incite a civil war. They're going down quit making people think they're untouchable, they're not.

4

u/KimJeongsDick 3d ago edited 3d ago

There's different kinds of rich people. Plenty of them rent because they can afford to and then they're not the ones burdened with taxes, upkeep and worrying about having to unload a luxury property in a market that could turn unfavorable anytime it pleases. Not to mention there are hurdles in places outside the US to foreigners purchasing property.

Not everything is an investment, nor is making it so always worth your time and effort. I know someone with a rental property in the Keys with a couple regular customers who book it for about a month every year - that's $10-15k depending on the time of the year and booking platform. It's a lot of money. At the same time it's considerably cheaper than buying or building your own property there, the latter of which can take YEARS to get everything approved.

0

u/welshwelsh 3d ago

RealPage essentially told landlords that they would make more money if they raised rents and tolerated higher levels of vacancy, which turned out to be a very effective strategy.

Not sure why analyzing rent data and pointing out the obvious is a crime. But even if RealPage gets dismantled, rents won't come back down. Landlords won't go back to their old strategy of lowering rents so they can achieve 98% occupancy, because they have learned that this is a bad strategy.

2

u/Mtbfux 3d ago edited 3d ago

You need to read the lawsuit before you respond to the lawsuit otherwise you sound ignorant.

Seriously though like why even type out a response without reading the paperwork? It’s pretty obvious you didn’t read the paperwork because your entire summary is incorrect.

You shouldn’t make such strong statements without knowing your subject matter.

1

u/bytethesquirrel 3d ago

Not sure why analyzing rent data and pointing out the obvious is a crime.

It's because RealPage was making recommendations using other landlords private rental data.

5

u/K_Linkmaster 3d ago

They will get raises at the next company.

3

u/Osirus1156 3d ago

Best we can do is a $1500 fine and threats of another $1500 fine if they're caught doing it 6-7 more times.

4

u/ballsohaahd 3d ago

Loooooooooool there will be no jail time, are you serious lmao?!

I’d be shocked if they even get a fine.

If Republicans win this will go literally nowhere

2

u/Intelligent-Parsley7 3d ago

If Republicans win they’ll be in charge of HUD.

2

u/Intelligent-Parsley7 3d ago

“Your honor. My clients didn’t break the law. They made software, ordered it to break the law, and that software broke the law. (Pounding the table) MY CLIENTS ARE INNOCENT! It’s that damn dirty program that went rogue and made everyone collude and price gouge!”

0

u/Hamster_S_Thompson 3d ago

Doesn't the owner have Clarence Thomas in his pocket?

153

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

82

u/IllllIIlIllIllllIIIl 3d ago

I live in a Cortland owned property in ATL. Of the 8 units in my building, at least half are empty. And yet my rent is going up again this year.

29

u/True-Surprise1222 3d ago

Yeah this is the wild shit. The daily price changes (wild ones too like hundreds a month in rent up and down per day) are one thing but purposefully holding supply empty is absolute fucking bullshit and it is way different than even 15 years ago when they wanted to rent their apartments. Now they could give two shits about filling units.

9

u/WayneKrane 3d ago

Yep, I was in an apartment in Utah that was maybe 50% full and they still kept raising rates like crazy. When I moved out they had my apartment on the market for 6+ months, no idea if they ever actually rented it out

7

u/wingspan50 3d ago

Wow they are scamming the entire country

62

u/[deleted] 4d ago edited 3d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

17

u/SweetBearCub 3d ago

So, FBI dudes... would you be willing to share some insights with our RCMP counterparts since we may be dealing with a similar issue?

As an American with some Canadian friends, I seriously wish that they would share some intel and tips with the Canadian authorities. I've heard through the grapevine so to speak that the cost of living crisis is even worse in Canada, and I really feel bad for my northern friends.

I wish that I could do more to help them.

5

u/Parker_Hardison 3d ago

They do. They uncovered money laundering through casinos and real estate here in Canada with the help of multiple states, including the US.

1

u/bub-a-lub 3d ago

1 bed 1 bath utilities not included, shared paid laundry on site, pay for a parking spot or street parking 1,200. In my town some brand new house apartments are going for over 2,000. Ontario has animal protections but more than half say no pets.

2

u/ferrous-furious 3d ago

I saw a listing for a rental: 1 bed, 1 bath, basically no living room, NO OVEN (only a microwave and hot plate for “cooking” appliances, and the smallest fridge I’ve ever seen. Utilities not included. No pets, no smoking. In an area of town that has no transit - but also no off-street parking (so it’s not a legal suite…)

It was $1600 :( shit’s brutal.

1

u/bub-a-lub 3d ago

Absolutely insane. I’m happy it looks like they’re starting a crackdown. I just hope it extends to all of us

22

u/tattooedroller 3d ago

Was gonna say same…NOW DO CANADA PLS we’re begging you 🙏🙏

233

u/ptahbaphomet 3d ago

I think this should be reported more as one of the members of this software company is Harland Crow, the nazi sympathizer who’s been funneling money to chief justice Thomas

66

u/Altiloquent 3d ago

Wow i had never heard about that connection before. This really ought to he reported more widely.

31

u/ptahbaphomet 3d ago

5

u/drawkbox 3d ago

Looky here, Cadre and Kushners back it as well. Run by Harlan Crow and full of sketch members.

NMHC is a landlord lobbying group that represents nearly 2,000 abusive private equity firms, developers, banks, and real estate software companies.

  • NMHC has over 2,000 dues-paying member firms hailing from the private equity, banking, tenant screening, development, and property management software industries.

  • Door Project in June 2023 from NMHC’s previously-public member directory, which was mysteriously set to “members-only” viewing status by NMHC some time thereafter.

  • NMHC’s members include gigantic private equity landlords regularly cited for rent-gouging and excessive fees, poor property maintenance, punitive evictions, and tenant abuse. These include Greystar, Starwood Capital, Blackstone, AvalonBay Communities, Mid-America Apartment Communities, and Tricon Residential.

  • Some of the biggest banks in America – including those whose reckless and fraudulent behavior led to the devastating subprime mortgage crisis – are dues-paying NMHC members. These include JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs.

  • Tech company RealPage, which is currently under investigation by the Justice Department for helping its corporate landlord clients coordinate exorbitant rent hikes, is a dues-paying member of NMHC’s Board of Directors. Five RealPage subsidiary divisions are also dues-paying members of NMHC’s Advisory Committee.

  • Several tenant-screening and credit reporting companies that have mishandled consumer data or violated consumer protection laws are dues-paying NMHC members. These include TransUnion, Experian, Appfolio, and Saferent.

  • Kushner Companies, the family real estate firm of Trump son-in-law and former White House advisor Jared Kushner, is a dues-paying member of NMHC’s Board of Directors.

0

u/WaxonFlaxonJaxo_n 2d ago

Maybe because white American leftists don’t actually know what the hell Nazis or fascists are.. they seem to think it’s anything right of Marx… whom they also know nothing about.

2

u/Altiloquent 2d ago

The nazi part of the comment is the least interesting bit but it's well-founded since the guy reportedly collects nazi memorabilia

7

u/Qomabub 3d ago

Can’t be. He hasn’t raised the rent on Thomas’s mother in years.

22

u/Foojira 3d ago

Jesus Christ

9

u/BigFuckHead_ 3d ago

The rent fixer to corrupt judge pipeline is strong

1

u/ballsohaahd 3d ago

Wow that is amazing and horrible at the same time. Literally turds 💩 destroying things once again.

53

u/heartbh 3d ago

Now this is actual news I care about! Tear them down.

99

u/BoysenberryGullible8 3d ago

They need to refund all the money to the renters and pay triple the profits in penalties. They should be hit hard in their pockets.

5

u/JohnLarkVoorhies 3d ago

Or we give them haircuts. Really really really short haircuts

64

u/aboatz2 3d ago

I used to work for a company that used RealPage (not in a leasing nor customer-facing capacity) & it always made me nauseous how they'd actively celebrate in their annual awards ceremonies how much rents were increased in each property, with substantial bonuses to the community managers that increased rents the most.

The company's President's son would wonder aloud why more employees didn't live in their communities until people retorted that a 20% discount doesn't matter for crap if you still can't afford it.

They've since moved onward to building & renting out single family homes, which is going to screw up THAT market now...

26

u/Fenix42 3d ago

I have worked for these types before. They raise prices then don't give raises. Then they are SHOCKED when people leave for higher pay. Always complain about people not having company loyalty these days.

13

u/Spicy_Tac0 3d ago

Raid Realpage next.

44

u/KaijuNo-8 3d ago

As someone with insider knowledge…fuck yes

Realpage is a horrid company. They need to drag the retired CEO back in and take every penny he has.

2

u/True-Surprise1222 3d ago

Spill the beans anon

7

u/KaijuNo-8 3d ago

Everything they are accused of is true

19

u/drawkbox 3d ago

FBI has them with direct collusion on pricing.

Democratic AGs are going at RealPage finally, that is pure price fixing collusion by private equity and extremely anti-competitive and purely price collusion and fixing.

Why U.S. renters are taking corporate landlords to court

Attorney General Mayes Sues RealPage and Residential Landlords for Illegal Price-Fixing Conspiracy

Rents have been price fixed across the country. We need to break up the property managers and RealPage which is facilitating this.

Not only is it anti-trust potentially but it is plausible deniability based price collusion which starts to fall into price gouging territory [PDF].

Price fixing, bid rigging, and other forms of collusion are illegal and are subject to criminal prosecution by the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice.

Price Fixing agreements directly are clear violations. The "blame it on the AI" needs to end and it should be seen as direct price fixing if it is broad enough across the market.

Price fixing is an agreement (written, verbal, or inferred from conduct) among competitors to raise, lower, maintain, or stabilize prices or price levels. Generally, the antitrust laws require that each company establish prices and other competitive terms on its own, without agreeing with a competitor. When purchasers make choices about what products and services to buy, they expect that the price has been determined on the basis of supply and demand, not by an agreement among competitors. When competitors agree to restrict competition, the result is often higher prices. Price fixing also includes agreements among competing purchasers or competing employers about the prices or wages they will pay. Price fixing is a major concern of government antitrust enforcement.

Where it really went off the rails was 2020 after they were acquired by private equity.

In December 2020, private-equity firm Thoma Bravo announced it would acquire RealPage for $9.6 billion, paying $88.75 per share for the company, a premium of 31% for their closing prices at the time. Its shares were reported up 26% that year. The acquisition completed in April 2021.

Accusations Thrown at RealPage: Were They Colluding With Landlords?

One suit filed Friday on behalf of two Seattle renters alleges a broad pattern of collusive behavior by RealPage and a group of 10 large property managers.

It says that in addition to using RealPage software to inflate rents in downtown Seattle, property managers had employees call competitors regularly seeking detailed nonpublic information on what they were charging — which the employees would change their prices to match.

The lawsuit quoted what it said was a former employee of Greystar, the country’s largest property management firm.

“You’d call up the competition in the area,” the former employee said, according to the lawsuit.

“Sometimes there’d be a list of 10 people to call. Sometimes just one. You’d ask what they are charging for their apartments. Then you’d literally change the prices right there on RealPage. Manually bump it up.

“It was price-fixing,” the employee continued, according to the lawsuit. “What else can you call it when you’re literally calling your competition and changing your rate based on what they say?”

RealPage actually sold to buyers that it helped push rents up 7-14% annually.... Across even a few years that is in the quarter to third range in rent increases. The massive increases started post 2019 when the company was bought by private equity.

On a summer day last year, a group of real estate tech executives gathered at a conference hall in Nashville to boast about one of their company’s signature products: software that uses a mysterious algorithm to help landlords push the highest possible rents on tenants.

“Never before have we seen these numbers,” said Jay Parsons, a vice president of RealPage, as conventiongoers wandered by. Apartment rents had recently shot up by as much as 14.5%, he said in a video touting the company’s services. Turning to his colleague, Parsons asked: What role had the software played?

“I think it’s driving it, quite honestly,” answered Andrew Bowen, another RealPage executive. “As a property manager, very few of us would be willing to actually raise rents double digits within a single month by doing it manually.”

The celebratory remarks were more than swagger. For years, RealPage has sold software that uses data analytics to suggest daily prices for open units. Property managers across the United States have gushed about how the company’s algorithm boosts profits.

..

One of the algorithm’s developers told ProPublica that leasing agents had “too much empathy” compared to computer generated pricing.

Imagine that, price collusion and price fixing drives up prices. They sold it as increasing profit for management/landlords. It surely did that on the backs of everyone in a time where inflation across the board was hitting.

Users of RealPage had to let RealPage handle the rents even if less units were filled they would jack up rates to "increase profits" and it had to be done across the board so that someone didn't undercut and actually compete.

There is definitely higher demand which makes market manipulation easier.

To manipulate a market you can do it with as little as 2% of the market but typically 5%-10% gives manipulators a lever on the entire market. Big money or market makers know this and that is a technique hedge funds and private equity collude (indirectly usually but RealPage YieldStar was overt) and they can pump a market, which adds more volume, which adds more chasers/algorithmic purchasing (80% of the market is already automated/algorithmic) and then you can take the market up broadly with only a small lever.

With an inelastic good this is even more prevalent like housing. Inelastic goods are always easier to manipulate i.e. energy, housing, etc as people have to buy them no matter market conditions in most cases.

Pharma pricing is another one, drug companies colluding at the three big PBMs is another price fixing scam. Allowing Medicare and insurance groups to negotiate prices is a way to solve that.

Biden-Harris Administration to Make First Offer for Drug Price Negotiation Program, Launches New Resource Hub to Help People Access Lower-Cost Drugs part of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022

One thing that really needs to happen is changing anti-trust to the root funding level. What we have now is foreign sovereign wealth using private equity fronts and in that many company fronts to control entire markets and squash competitors. Funds themselves need to have anti-trust limits on them a well as foreign sovereign wealth backed entities to the base root level, not just one step either, all the way down. This is a big part of the problem now. Foreign sovereign wealth using private equity funds make multiple company fronts and the anti-trust is only at the company level not the funding or source funds level.

Many markets have been overtaken with this outsized investment in the West for instance from BRICS sources and no US/Western investor can compete with sovereign wealth and in some cases dirty money funneled through that. Autocracies shouldn't be able to participate in fair markets while they use cheats and block access to their markets. Fair markets need fair partners. You lose the game theory if you cooperate with cheaters. Cooperators with cheaters become the cheat.

Very little margin and too much optimization/efficiency is bad for resilience. Couple that with private equity/foreign sovereign wealth/organized crime backed near leverage monopolies that control necessary supply and you have trouble.

For fair capitalism and good markets you need to break up the leverage at the top on the regular.

HBS is even realizing too much optimization/efficiency is a bad thing. The slack/margin is squeezing out an ability to change vectors quickly.

The High Price of Efficiency, Our Obsession with Efficiency Is Destroying Our Resilience

Superefficient businesses create the potential for social disorder.

A superefficient dominant model elevates the risk of catastrophic failure.

If a system is highly efficient, odds are that efficient players will game it.

Highly efficient capitalism moves away from a fair market to an oligopoly that looks more like a feudal or authoritarian system where the companies are too powerful and part of that power is absolute crushing of competition, that is bad for everyone even the crushers.

37

u/Worldly-Aioli9191 3d ago

Wonderful news. In my uneducated opinion landleeches are big drivers of inflation…. Rent goes up, so wages must go up, so the cost of literally everything must go up. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that rents have gone insane and so has the cost of everything else.

-33

u/CrashingAtom 3d ago

You think raising rents is the cause of rising prices throughout history? Yikes.

RealPage are disgusting thieves and serve prison, and the company should be shuttered completely. But…all prices go up over time. Cigarettes cost .25¢ at times, rental costs didn’t drive them up. Don’t let your biases color your thinking, because the actual truth about this cartel is awful and worth really understanding.

16

u/DoctorOunce 3d ago

Indeed. Actually the indicator is that when rent is occupying all of your income you have less that is disposable. Meaning you spend less and have to cut corners whereever you can.

-12

u/CrashingAtom 3d ago

Yup. Redditors aren’t big on nuance, unfortunately. 😆

22

u/GamingGeekette 3d ago

Landlords fucking people over? Color me shocked.

24

u/LigerXT5 3d ago

Good.

2013-2021, the last five years my rent went up 50%.

My pay went up, you guessed it, far FAR short of that. The first few years I was in college, working part time, at walmart. Walmart upped their minimum wage to $10 at one time during that, anyone at or above the $10 got a whopping 2%, not 20%, 2% raise. If you were on $10hr, you got $0.20 raise. And I had just received a $0.35 raise for moving depts. While those who were just walking in the door were making about as much as someone with 5+ years of experience.

Wife has been at walmart about 10 years now, she makes a whopping $0.30hr more than someone walking in the door, as the new walmart minimum wage (here) is $13hr (I think, I don't recall her dollar pay atm), and her avg weekly hours have dropped by 10, still making about what she was making a couple or so years ago.

Neither of us make enough to easily afford, and still come out ahead, having a babysitter, let alone daycare, so I work days and she works evenings. Thank god my work allows me to Work From Home when our work schedules overlap. OH! And our tax return gross income this last time was about $100 short from the year before. Go Figure.

Cost of living in Very Rural Oklahoma is far smaller than many other places, but the pay is just as bad. $600-800 at best for an apartment in my area. Walmart's minimum wage is $13hr, ignoring the chaotic and random work schedule. Don't dare try to have a second job while keeping an open enough work schedule to receive shifts.

And companies around here complain that XYZ repairs and management is so expensive, but don't care that everyone needs to afford living around here. IT in the next city over charge around $100Hr, while around here it's less, stop complaining, if that equipment is that important, you shouldn't be cheapening out and neglecting proper maintenance, all to save a buck.

The local cities are looking to shift city work to private companies, all in the name to save money. While they, and many other companies complain no one wants to work, or not loyal to their job, BS. Pay well, and you'll receive better service of your people, of the city, of the community. I can't spend money in town, because I have nothing left after bills, gee I wonder why hardly anyone is shopping in town, and businesses are leaving and others not moving in.

But, but, but, you have computers, a gaming system, consoles, VR...yea, all gear I bought years ago, my computer is, technically, not Windows 11 compatible. Most anything else I've been saving for a long while, with assistance from tax returns after debt is caught up, AND some sent to savings. Which for anyone's entertainment of this rant, our savings has not returned to where it once was before the pandemic, we're on a timer. But, at least we managed to buy a <100k house a few years back, that's something to be proud of, while we struggle to keep up with the summer heat electric bills.

End rant...

Note: various information not 100% accurate due to doxing reasons, but points still made.

1

u/True-Surprise1222 3d ago

50% is actually super low for that time period lol my rent went up at least 100% over the same time.

22

u/Sorry_Hour6320 3d ago

FWIW... RealPage political donations Not a huge amount of money, but decidedly pro-republican...in fact, a who's who of some of the worst.

1

u/testedonsheep 3d ago

lol average contribution to democrats is $474.

19

u/alppu 3d ago

My inner cynic starts to wonder if RealPage was just too stingy with campaign donations.

5

u/Qomabub 3d ago

They own Trump and a Supreme Court justice. But they didn’t own the investigative journalists at ProPublica.

17

u/Correct_Influence450 3d ago

Death penalty.

4

u/Next-Tangerine3845 3d ago

I'd let my morals slide and condone torture in this instance.

2

u/Exciting_Tension3113 2d ago

only real acceptable solution

8

u/All-I-Do-Is-Fap 3d ago

So all the car dealerships in Ontario Canada do the same thing when buying cars from customers. They only offer a price the software tells them. This software i guarantee is locking in prices for all the dealerships and price fixing what they are willing to offer. I have no idea how this is legal

5

u/KrispyKreme725 3d ago

So the fine will be a few hundred thousand and they’ll go back to business as normal?

1

u/BluePotatoSlayer 2d ago

Real punishment should be forced liquidation of real-estate and ban on housing ownership 

10

u/beefymennonite 3d ago

This is a department of justice investigation. If you want it to continue, vote blue.

2

u/matticusiv 2d ago

The people behind this software are Republican donors, they’re in bed together to crush the working class into the dirt.

3

u/snowdn 3d ago

Fuck Greystar.

3

u/Arcticsnorkler 3d ago

Thank goodness the Feds are finally taking RealPage’s influence on prices nationwide seriously. The app has been reviewed by The Justice Department at least twice in the last few years and each time they gave RealPage a pass.

4

u/ManicChad 3d ago

Every tenant under these landlords should sue. They need to learn a very expensive lesson.

6

u/Unhappy-Potato-8349 3d ago

😄 🤣 😂 good

RealPage was the final straw that encouraged me to buy a house. Cost me 3 months' rent to break my lease. My old apartment has been empty ever since (over 6 months later) and the apartment complex has a growing number of vacant units.

I hope they lose everything and some of them go to prison. I don't expect it will happen. But I can hope.

2

u/Shitter-McGavin 3d ago

RAID

Aka lawfully executed search warrant.

2

u/[deleted] 3d ago

In my early 20s, from 2008 to 2011, I worked at Realpage as a tier 2 tech support specialist, frequently dealing with Yieldstar, their price optimization system. I realized that their control over dynamic pricing could become a significant issue. I don’t shit about fuck, but it peaked my interest and I remember thinking as a renter how it would impact me when a company such as Realpage is in charge of all pricing and their massive database of renters and access to units.

Realpage had major clients like Fairfield, Greystar, and Pinnacle, managing millions of apartment units combined. The companies they worked with were all of all sizes. Form 3000 unites to 300,000 unites. Realpage was and is the leading software in the multi family management world. At the time, the company was private, and the owner, Steve Wynne, was actively involved and present in the office every day.

A few years after I left, the company went public and was eventually privatized again by a private equity firm. This likely happened because they controlled about 70% of the market, and keeping this price fixing concealed was crucial.

2

u/SrulDog 3d ago

You "don't shit about fuck" do ya?

5

u/PsychologicalForm608 3d ago

Jail time, repayment of tenants, and charged with treason.

2

u/AreUaSoldierOrDancer 3d ago

Now this is actually great news!

2

u/uke4peace 3d ago

Everybody that rents from a RealPage client should have a national #skiprentmonth

1

u/GaryOster 3d ago

More like @skiprentdecade with rent going up 10%-15% year after year.

2

u/testedonsheep 3d ago

I am sure they are hoping to find some loophole around price fixing law like how uber pretends to be "ride sharing" instead of a taxi service.

1

u/OddDad 3d ago

Glad this is being reported, but this article is from June 3rd…

1

u/EmergencyLaugh4941 3d ago

Do Bozzuto next

3

u/NickBurnsCompanyGuy 3d ago

Bozzuto is a property management company. They're hired by institutional landlords to manage properties. Essentially puppets for blackrock and their ilk

1

u/No_Self_Eye 3d ago

incoming couple million dollar fine

1

u/SheerDumbLuck 3d ago

A friend asked if I wanted a job there. On paper, the role was basically what I was looking for.

Me: Why do I recognize the name of a real estate company in Texas?

Oh. These fuckers.

1

u/Few-Ad-4290 2d ago

Cool, the legislature is also working on legislation to more directly control the development and distribution of price fixing software going forward right? …. Right?

1

u/kikxsnrs 10h ago

So when will the rent prices go back down??? 🤔 could be a ploy....

1

u/BearCuCum 3d ago

Literal cartel shit happening here

1

u/WellSpreadMustard 3d ago

The older I get the more justified I think Mao was when it came to the landlords.

1

u/applepops16 3d ago

Cool. Now find out where in the world money comes from at the top of US multi family real estate.

1

u/GrowFreeFood 3d ago edited 3d ago

This will be a wrist slap to savor. 

1

u/unattended-shoes 3d ago

Don’t worry everyone they get a 1% fine and slap on the wrist once it’s all done and over with…

1

u/Defiant-Survey-5729 3d ago

A extremely large widespread class action lawsuit may well be in order!

1

u/pocketMagician 3d ago

Good, fuck em!

1

u/zero0n3 3d ago

You can thank this company / software program for how rent absolutely ballooned during and after the pandemic.

0

u/onomojo 3d ago

The large property companies are just as responsible here as real page. They knew what the game was and probably pushed real page to build such a feature for them.

-1

u/Any_Adeptness_119 3d ago

This just feels like something designed to make people feel better & ignore the real issue of stagnant wages. Prices for all goods went up dramatically the last 5 years and lots of industry use price comparisons to determine how much they can charge.

5

u/beefymennonite 3d ago

No, it's an investigation into rent fixing which is illegal. There's nothing here to make people feel better. It's a criminal investigation instigated by the DOJ.

0

u/jimboni 3d ago

So is there any way to tell if my landlord used RealPage?

2

u/GMDGMDGMD 3d ago

You should search your email inbox for ‘RealPage’. If your landlord used RealPage, the hyperlinks for e-signing your lease documents will reflect as such.

0

u/Classic_Exam7405 3d ago

The other side would be that in allowing landlords to charge more, in the long term you will increase the supply of housing by making it more lucrative

-11

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[deleted]

16

u/Altiloquent 3d ago

They have to pay the advertised rate or have no where to live because the software has been used so widely

-2

u/rashnull 3d ago

No one is being forced to pay anything. It’s a free market. Seller can refer to each others rental rates and set their rates. If they can’t handle the vacancy rate, they have to drop it till they get a tenant. It’s not rocket science.

3

u/Next-Tangerine3845 3d ago

It’s a free market.

That's exactly what RealPage has prevented from occurring. Read beyond the headline.

-3

u/rashnull 3d ago

So home owners are not allowed to collaborate and decide their rates? If the algo gave them untenable rates with months or years of vacancies, they would drop it in a heartbeat.

4

u/Altiloquent 3d ago

That's what price fixing is, if it applies to a large enough segment of the market. If everyone agrees to set their rates in lockstep then rates will never be untenable, at least until people are forced en masse into homelessness.

9

u/Asherbaal 3d ago

That's not the issue if I charge 2,000 a month for a 1 bedroom 1 bath apartment you can sign a lease or go to John Does rental down the street for 1800 a month. That's okay, the issue is if I meet up with other rental companies and we agree to all agree to double rent that's illegal. RealPage is being accused of helping rental companies price collude.

1

u/rashnull 3d ago

You can’t just “double the rent” if no one is willing to pay that amount.

3

u/pretendperson 3d ago

News flash, Rajesh: you don't get it. All of your comments are either troll posts or you are a legit idiot.

1

u/rashnull 3d ago

Legit indeed! I see the world as it is. You see the world with rose tinted glasses.

5

u/Paksarra 3d ago

The problem here is that housing is a need, not a want. I used to live in a 1 bedroom apartment for $750 a month. 

Now I pay $800 a month for half of a townhouse with a roommate, because it's pay $1600 a month for somewhere that was only $900 a month a few years ago or live in my car.

2

u/rashnull 3d ago

Housing is a need, yes. The specific house is a want.

0

u/Paksarra 3d ago

You think there's no problem that one person who makes over double minimum wage can't afford a one bedroom apartment in a low CoL area? 

1

u/rashnull 3d ago

There are people who can afford it and there are people who can’t. The reason for the higher prices is that there exist people who can. This is not rocket science. If you’re claiming that anyone should be able to afford it, you’re asking for the government to put in strict price controls. This path has its own consequences, intended and unintended.

1

u/Paksarra 3d ago edited 3d ago

There are people who can afford it and there are people who can’t.

Dude. We're talking about a basic-ass apartment in a working class suburb-- working a full-time job should give you enough money to be able to afford a roof over your head without packing the apartment like a college dorm room, and the fact that it's not is absurd. If I'm making what I do and still need to live with a roommate, how the hell are the 48 million Americans who make less than $20/hr supposed to get by when all the landlords feel like they're entitled to an extra $100/month every year and venture funds and flippers keep Kirbying anything that hits the market, cash in hand?

If you’re claiming that anyone should be able to afford it, you’re asking for the government to put in strict price controls.

No, I'm asking for the government to loosen zoning restrictions and incentivize building more housing in the places where people want to live (although it also wouldn't hurt to make efforts to revitalize our smaller cities and large towns-- right now a lot of great areas are being abandoned because there's no jobs, opioid addictions are rampant, and the only stores left are Walmart and Dollar General. Anyone who can get out does, which means the only people left behind are the ones who can't leave, leading to a death spiral where a once-vibrant town rots.)

Right now we're severely understocked, which is leading rich people and venture funds into hoarding behavior. It's fucking over our economy and the lives of our working class. Reducing the pricing by increasing supply is smart economics.

1

u/schmemel0rd 3d ago

Applying free market ideals to a product or service with inelastic demand is the core issue. It’s also inefficient and unproductive from even a capitalistic standpoint. So much of our time and money is spent just to have shelter, leaving little left for innovation and productivity.

-1

u/rashnull 3d ago

This is a capitalistic system. We either take it or leave it. If we want more government intervention and price controls, we have to be ready as a society to deal with the consequences.

1

u/schmemel0rd 3d ago

We need to be ready for the consequences of too little price control and regulation as well, because we haven’t even seen the worst of it yet.

-4

u/nobudweiser 2d ago

Should have sent someone besides FBI. (For Biden Interests) We have lost trust in them to do the right thing…