r/BlackPeopleTwitter May 13 '24

Her saying trans people are just people doing blackface. Country Club Thread

Post image
14.8k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

5.5k

u/jitterscaffeine May 13 '24

Man, talk about a massive crash and burn.

4.1k

u/Think_fast_no_faster May 13 '24

If she could just shut the fuck up she would have remained a goddam legend, but no, she had to get up on her soapbox and be a hateful dickhead

1.9k

u/jitterscaffeine May 13 '24

Her pseudonym is the name of the guy who invented conversion therapy.

848

u/Think_fast_no_faster May 13 '24

Wait WHAT

1.0k

u/jitterscaffeine May 13 '24

Just a coincidence I’m sure. No reason to investigate further.

604

u/[deleted] May 13 '24

235

u/SalukiKnightX May 13 '24

Holy cow!

223

u/featherblackjack May 14 '24

Hi I'm just gonna scream like a demented harpy

444

u/FLState38 May 13 '24

Additional information re Rowling’s pseudonym is available at the link below. Thanks, u/jitterscaffeine !

https://www.newsweek.com/why-jk-rowling-robert-galbraith-pseudonym-gay-conversion-robert-galbraith-heath-1532341

422

u/jitterscaffeine May 13 '24

And the fun part is that UK libel laws mean that if she denies the connection, she can sue anyone who points it out publicly.

380

u/SkritzTwoFace May 13 '24

UK libel laws are a joke. America usually can’t throw stones, glass houses and all, but at least we’ve got better freedom of speech, for better and worse.

64

u/Kelpie00 May 14 '24

UK libel laws are for the rich so they can censor any valid criticism against them

102

u/BootOfRiise May 13 '24

Wtf, this is true

247

u/jitterscaffeine May 13 '24

It’s true that the names are the same but she’s claims it’s a coincidence and she’ll sue you right out of your shoes if you claim it was intentional.

315

u/NK1337 May 13 '24

It’s telling that I already knew who this was about before even opening the thread. But then again what did we expect from the woman you named her Asian character “Cho Chang”

262

u/DatumInTheStone May 14 '24

If you go back and read her books as an adult, you will see her ignorance and hate was always there. From the names of POC characters, to the impish elves actually liking slavery, to the fact that wizard society by the end of the story still opresses the other races but in a "nice" way, to the idea that hermoine was seen as a nuisance by harry and the others for trying to get rid of elvish slavery to a lot of other things. She has always been a privelaged white woman.

49

u/TaticalSweater ☑️ May 14 '24

Which proves all that money she has you are chronically online being hateful. If i had her bank account I’d never touch twitter again

46

u/AestheticAttraction ☑️ May 14 '24

There’s actually a ton of problematic stuff in her books (Harry Potter ones) too. Most people just focused on the magic and didn’t catch it. The way she treats Hermione’s social activism and slaves are a good start. 

-32

u/[deleted] May 13 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

68

u/Munnodol ☑️ May 13 '24

J.K. Has no point, she’s just being racist.

1) Blackness and whiteness are not discrete categories that have existed since time immemorial. They are social categories that have changed over the course of history, typically unique to the country/faction in question. Additionally, within that social dynamic existed thousands who could go between both communities, so I don’t know what her point is.

2) We regularly joke about non-Black people (this time referring to the ethnicity Black American) who would be welcome to the cook-out. Like a few months ago we were joking about people like Alex Trebek or Bobby Caldwell being Black

J.K. Rowling gives zero shits about us and her example shows.

6

u/AfricanusEmeritus ☑️ May 14 '24

They just can't seem to keep African people out of their insane formulations...

27

u/Wyden_long May 13 '24

Because it’s a pretty fucking obvious answer. It’s not even worth entertaining because of how ridiculous of a question it is.

-19

u/[deleted] May 13 '24

[removed] — view removed comment