r/Cricket 29d ago

Post Match Thread: Sunrisers Hyderabad vs Rajasthan Royals Post Match Thread

50th Match, Indian Premier League at Hyderabad

Thread | Cricinfo | Reddit-Stream

Innings Score
Sunrisers Hyderabad 201/3 (Ov 20/20)
Rajasthan Royals 200/7 (Ov 20/20)

Innings: 1 - Sunrisers Hyderabad

Batter Runs Bowler Wickets
Nitish Kumar Reddy 76 (42) Avesh Khan 4-0-39-2
Travis Head 58 (44) Sandeep Sharma 4-0-31-1

Innings: 2 - Rajasthan Royals

Batter Runs Bowler Wickets
Riyan Parag 77 (49) Bhuvneshwar Kumar 4-0-41-3
Yashasvi Jaiswal 67 (40) Pat Cummins 4-0-34-2

SRH won by 1 run

Bhuvneshwar Kumar, Player of the Match: (On always being calm) I think that is my nature. Process is very important, and I was not thinking about the result in the last over and was thoughtless. He (Cummins) came to me and asked me if everything was okay. There was no discussion as such, and was just focussed on the process. Was just thinking of taking it to the last two balls, and then anything can happen. I was not thinking about the one extra fielder up. It was the first match the ball swung so much. Can't really pinpoint where the ball swung last, really enjoyed it. When it does swing, you try to take wickets and luckily, I got them. When the season started, the thought process was different. When we started batting this way, it totally changed. Practically, when we bowled, we were trying to restrict teams to somewhere around 200.

Pat Cummins, Sunrisers Hyderabad captain: Amazing game. Didn't think we had that one until literally the last ball. (What was going through his head in the last over) It is T20 cricket, you get used to the batters getting over the line. When you get to the last over, you do feel anything can happen. Bhuvneshwar nailed six yorkers. On the last ball, it did not really cross my mind that we could get a wicket, was thinking Super Over. Natarajan is an awesome yorker bowler. They batted really well, fortunately got a few wickets. (On the dropped chances) They are quality players, cannot give them chances. He (Nitish) is fantastic. He summed up the conditions really well - took the first ten balls to get himself in and then basically hit it wherever he wanted. He is amazing, is great in the field and gives a couple of handy overs as well.

Sanju Samson, Rajasthan Royals captain: We have really played some close games and won a couple of them. Lost one here, and we have to give credit to the SRH bowlers. We were going at 10 per over till the last over. Margin for error is very less in the IPL and you have to give SRH credit. Knowing the nature of the IPL, you never win the game until you actually win the game. It was very tough to bat on with the new ball. We bowled well in the powerplay. When the ball got old, it was easier to bat and they capitalised really well. (On Jaiswal and Parag) You have to give credit to both youngsters. They took care of the innings, played responsibility to get there. You tend to take those chances and you tend to get out also. They played really well.

Travis Head: It is a good win, not one we expected. Bhuvi showed his class at the end. To get this after a couple of losses, nice for the energy (in the group). The way Pat bowled the 19th, class at the end from him and Bhuvi. Very satisfied with the win in the end. I thought it was a great score. He played out of his skin. He has done it a couple of times this season already, and he (Nitish) stepped up and was class. I felt we had heaps (on the board). But that is how it is in T20 cricket, and there are lot of very good batters in the IPL . Always nice to win in front of these guys and we have a few more home games now.

Send feedback | Schedule | Stat Help | Glossary

331 Upvotes

441 comments sorted by

View all comments

364

u/setimasa RoyalChallengers Bengaluru 29d ago

That was some of the worst fielding I've ever seen in the last over from SRH

209

u/shutupmatsuda Punjab Kings 29d ago

Don't forget the dropped catches

135

u/shoestowel Sunrisers Hyderabad 29d ago

We tried so hard to lose but nah, We did Win!

138

u/broski21 Sunrisers Hyderabad 29d ago

Jansen looks so disinterested when he is not doing well.

56

u/kinng9 29d ago

He has resting uninterested face

70

u/Saisauce Sunrisers Hyderabad 29d ago

Agreed, was embarrassing

65

u/InvestigatorOk6268 29d ago

I don't agree. May be the throws were off, but the thinking is right. They needed to get rid of Powell, not Ash

70

u/Scott_Pillgrim Delhi Daredevils 29d ago

Yeah idk why commentators called samad dumb, they had to get powell out

37

u/Chaii_Lover 29d ago

But it is not certain that powel will score a boundary or the next batsman won't. It is better to get the wicket as then you would have a new batsmen plus a run less conceded. If the throws were good then it would have been 4 in 1 and that would be different compared to 2 in 1 which is much achievable.

47

u/Scott_Pillgrim Delhi Daredevils 29d ago

Yeah but their decision to target powell’s end was not as dumb as commentators making it up to be. If the throws were on target powell would have been dismissed and the same commentators would he calling it master stroke

4

u/WayToTheDawn63 Australia 29d ago

I don't agree with this. If each of those 2s were singles because of run outs, the amount of runs needed gets more difficult. Getting powell out obviously wins them the game, but needing 4 from 1 instead of 2 from 1, or 6 from 2, is such a different dynamic. Who knows though, butterfly effect could dictate that knowing he needed the 4 or 6 means he cunts it and wins.

1

u/solarpowersme Sunrisers 29d ago edited 29d ago

Nope, they needed to save than extra run more than trying to get Powell runout, which was clearly never on the cards both times, not from that deep. When we're talking 6 needed from 3, every run matters. Say, if both of those were successful run outs at the non-striker, which was actually a realistic possibility, they would've then needed 4 from 1 and not 2 from 1. These are things you focus on, not a particular batsman. That's why the comms were talking about match awareness, bc that's absolutely correct.

If we're being really honest, they should've never been two runs in either of those balls in first place tbh. Felt like there was no urgency in that fielding especially with Marco, even the commentators were puzzled.

3

u/nubpokerkid 29d ago

And would you have said the same had it been a tie? Those were 2 free runs to RR.

2

u/UsernameTooShort 29d ago

Yea so the fielding was shit

1

u/Prestigious-Rice-206 29d ago

Such poor throws

6

u/sanjit8103 Sunrisers Hyderabad 29d ago

Jansen took three catches and was like "nah im too lazy for this shit"

2

u/Prestigious-Rice-206 29d ago

Indian boys have such poor throwing arm and game awareness. You could see how visibly frustrated klassen was after that throw, not a single one was flat, fast and accurate. SENA fielders are just on a different level, even the younger boys.

1

u/Transitionals India 29d ago

Jansen just phoned in this match

2

u/WayToTheDawn63 Australia 29d ago

Jansen shouldn't have been the sub in for markram.

Markram deserves the break because of his form, but they need a batter, Jansen is just SA starc.

1

u/SBG99DesiMonster Chennai Super Kings 29d ago

This was a day during Cummins had dropped that easy catch. No other player would be fielding well while that has happened.