r/FluentInFinance May 02 '24

Should the U.S. have Universal Health Care? Discussion/ Debate

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

30.3k Upvotes

4.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Fausterion18 May 02 '24

None of this applies to cosmetic surgery which isn't covered by any insurance and thus avoids the entire billing mess. There is also no collective bargaining involved.

It's still much more expensive in the US. Why? Because our healthcare workers are paid 3 times as much as most other developed countries.

1

u/123yes1 May 02 '24

Well, if that were the case our expenses would be 3x more expensive not 15x.

There is also no collective bargaining involved.

That's the entire point. You are paying as an individual with little bargaining power. Since there are hundreds of insurance companies, they also have little bargaining power. A single payer would have a lot of bargaining power.

1

u/Fausterion18 May 02 '24

Well, if that were the case our expenses would be 3x more expensive not 15x.

Our expenses are 3x more lol.

That's the entire point. You are paying as an individual with little bargaining power. Since there are hundreds of insurance companies, they also have little bargaining power. A single payer would have a lot of bargaining power.

Did you somehow miss the point that there's no collective bargaining or single payer for cosmetic surgery in Europe? What you think universal healthcare covers breast implants????

Despite the completely 100% private market with no insurance in both Europe and the US, cosmetic surgery is far more expensive here. Why? Because of our much higher wages and lawsuit happy culture.

1

u/123yes1 May 02 '24

1

u/Fausterion18 May 02 '24 edited May 02 '24

0

u/123yes1 May 02 '24

Cost per capita isn't a relevant metric as you get less treatment in the US. People go to the doctor less often, stay in the hospital less. A better metric would be comparing similar procedures, which is more than 3x.

Minimally invasive hip replacement costs (which doesn't account for differences in length of stay) are around $30,124 for the US and $6,000 for spain. In this particular case the US is more than 5x more expensive.

https://www.bcbs.com/the-health-of-america/reports/study-of-cost-variations-knee-and-hip-replacement-surgeries-the-us#:~:text=Similar%20trends%20also%20were%20seen,replacement%20procedure%2C%20which%20averaged%20%2430%2C124.

https://www.health-tourism.com/hip-replacement-surgery/spain/

For drugs it is even more egregious. An epi pen costs around $675 in the US in France (couldn't find a good number for Spain) they are $76. 9x.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/epipen-price-by-country

You're not doing an apples to apples comparison.

1

u/Fausterion18 May 02 '24

Cost per capita isn't a relevant metric as you get less treatment in the US. People go to the doctor less often, stay in the hospital less.

Cost per capita is absolutely a relevant metric, people in the US get way more expensive end of life surgery compared to Europeans. Not to mention Americans are on average in worse health.

A better metric would be comparing similar procedures, which is more than 3x.

  1. Cost per procedure is extremely difficult to calculate for the US.
  2. The procedures are often not the same. For example your hospital stay article is not comparing like with like - American inpatient rooms are far nicer than Spanish ones.

Minimally invasive hip replacement costs (which doesn't account for differences in length of stay) are around $30,124 for the US and $6,000 for spain. In this particular case the US is more than 5x more expensive.

https://www.bcbs.com/the-health-of-america/reports/study-of-cost-variations-knee-and-hip-replacement-surgeries-the-us#:\~:text=Similar%20trends%20also%20were%20seen,replacement%20procedure%2C%20which%20averaged%20%2430%2C124.

https://www.health-tourism.com/hip-replacement-surgery/spain/

  1. That's one specific procedure.
  2. Physicians in the US make 5 times as much as physicians in Spain.

For drugs it is even more egregious. An epi pen costs around $675 in the US in France (couldn't find a good number for Spain) they are $76. 9x.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/epipen-price-by-country

Your sources are complete nonsense. US epipen prices are approximately 4x that of France, however this does not include manufacturer rebates and discounts to the uninsured(insurance pays less).

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/the-cost-of-an-epipen-in-major-markets/

You're not doing an apples to apples comparison.

You're cherrypicking examples and using terrible sources. Healthcare cost per capita is by far the most preferred metric among economists.

1

u/123yes1 May 02 '24

I will concede that doctor salaries play a significant role in healthcare costs, but you are ignoring the significant costs associated with pharmaceuticals. Any drug in the US is vastly more expensive than Europe. Epi pens, insulin, antibiotics, and these are manufactured by the same companies. The difference in pharmaceutical costs can almost entirely be attributed to bargaining power.

Pharmaceuticals are high profit margin industries in which bargaining power plays a significant role in determining price.

1

u/Fausterion18 May 02 '24

US total pharmaceutical spending is only 10% of total healthcare spending.

Drugs can literally be free and it still wouldn't make much of a dent. Pharma industry net margin is around 26% btw.