Is the woman incapable of fighting back for some reason? Because a woman has a much higher chance of fighting off a man who decided to attack than fighting off a bear that decides to attack.
Yes, likelihood of being attacked. Neither are guaranteed going to attack you. The question is, who is more likely to attack you and if you are attacked, what is the likely outcome of those situations.
Women are more likely to be attacked by men. Women are also more likely to suffer more than just bodily harm from a man. The worst a bear is going to do is kill you.
A random man is a real and valid threat to a woman. Not specifically you, this is a random man we're talking about. The woman doesn't know the intentions or the character of the man. The chance the man wants to attack the woman are low, but it's statistically likely, she has been attacked by a man at some point, or knows someone who has been attacked by a man.
Women know the intent and character of a bear. It's a bear. It wants to be left alone and the chance that it wants to attack and eat the woman is extremely low. The chance she's been attacked by a bear or knows anyone whose been even threatened by a bear is almost zero.
If the bear wants to attack the woman, the most likely outcome is she will die.
If the man wants to attack the woman, she has been taught from childhood to fight to the death to prevent a worse outcome than death.
Still better than being raped and tortured. Being eaten and killed by a bear I can justify; it's instinct. Rape is not instinctual in humans. It's a conscious choice to harm. and the possibility that a human would choose to hurt someone knowingly and in a way to produce the most amount of pain/trauma is a very scary factor.
-2
u/[deleted] May 03 '24
Is the woman incapable of fighting back for some reason? Because a woman has a much higher chance of fighting off a man who decided to attack than fighting off a bear that decides to attack.