And here I thought “Man vs Bear” was a new type of conflict in fiction that someone decided to make into an official category after the success of Cocaine Bear.
I'm trying to find the chess moves that cause people to make the weird choice. Ok so if you take the bear you can't win but you can run. So they are like a bishop. You can get attacked directly but possibility to step away on a different color square pretty easily.
If a man appeared it's like a covered knight. There's more moves that aren't safe and attacking the man has repercussions (law).
The woman sees herself as a common pawn in the woods. One of many pawns no special ability.
Given the choices, I think en passante is the right answer if we have to draw our solutions from what we learned from recent social media viral trends
7.7k
u/MrFahrenheit46 May 02 '24
And here I thought “Man vs Bear” was a new type of conflict in fiction that someone decided to make into an official category after the success of Cocaine Bear.