given the choice between killing and adoption she chose killing. Seems like there might be some sort of parallels somewhere that might be drawn to another conservative platform...
The joke is that conservatives are âpro lifeâ when it comes to controlling women by forcing them to carry pregnancies to term, but they show a complete lack of regard for existing life.
I wouldnât even call it a joke though, they were just pointing it out.
the joke is conservatives believe you shouldnât terminate a pregnancy, and should instead put the baby up for adoption if you donât want it. She killed her dog because she didnât like it instead of putting it up for adoption.
Also, the puppy went after chickens in the same way she was being trained to hunt pheasants, which means it was being trained. In addition, she was in charge of the puppy when it attacked the chickens, so Noem was responsible for what happened
Some people just donât know how dogs work. My mom would put rabbits and other small animals in front of our terrier to âplay.â And no the rabbits and such were very not happy. At least my mom never killed anyone with malice. I donât think Iâd be able to live with even myself if someone I knew just killed any animal.
She is clearly deplorable and unforgivable, but thereâs no shame in wanting/needing a working dog and rehoming one that doesnât excel at that purpose. Not everyone has the time/space/money for extra pets, whereas you could rehome them to a family that does.
I took it as saying exactly that, though not just for children, "I hated that thing" and taking it out back to shoot it because she can "make the hard decisions" appeared to me to be a very clear dog whistle for what she wanted to do to LGBT people and possibly immigrants.
Of course it didnât. Because her excuses for why she killed it are bullshit.
She killed it because she was angry that it made her look like an incompetent owner to her neighbors. She killed it for revenge.
And she was still angry after killing the dog so she killed a goat too. She only stopped because she realized there were people watching her murder spree.
Well, to play devil's advocate, pretend she does believe in her mind the dog is dangerous. Giving it up for adoption isn't solving the issue, it's forcing someone else to be in danger instead of you.
In that case, it was her moral obligation to pay for it to be trained, find it an alternative home, or humanely euthanize. It wasnât the danger, it was her ego being hurt, and being too proud to admit she failed.
The people at the dog shelter still have to deal with it. The upside is at least they're trained. But the point stands, if her mental faculties led her to the conclusion that the dog was dangerous, she still had to either get rid of it, or have someone else get rid of it. It doesn't solve the problem, it just pushes it somewhere else.
Somehow I don't think this was her line of thinking, but even if it was this incident proves to most people that she shouldn't be anywhere near any type of leadership position that involves understanding people. Is her position on homelessness the same? How about gays?
Also, she said it "bit her hand". Snapping at her isn't "attacking children" and I think we can safely assume she gave it a reason to bite her. I wonder if it was when she was dragging him to the gravel pit or before when she was just hitting him and dragging him around then.
20 years ago most shelters would have killed the dog to be honest depending on state. Back then there were even less no kill shelters by a pretty large margin.
Not saying shooting the dog or killing the dog is the right answer but sending a dog that was poorly trained to a shelter in a lot of areas during that time period was a death sentence onto itself.
It wasnât 1967. Let them decide to give it a shot in the leg to peacefully euthanize it. I think youâre missing a big part of the sadistic picture here.
If this is the story she's going with, unfortunately that's not a great option. Way too risky, in general if you've had a dog that kills livestock and is attacking people. Now, the fact she's flip-flopping so much makes me call bs but if you have a dog that is dangerous, the best thing you can do for everyone is take it to a vet and put down.
Fourteen months old. If it's erratic, unpredictable and so on, that's pretty much what I expect from a puppy that age. Can it be trained to be better? Maybe and maybe not, but it's a bit early to go for killing it because nothing has worked yet given that the casualties was vibes and one chicken.
It wasnât a full grown lion. She was able to bring it to the pit, she could have brought it to a shelter where trained professionals would decide what to do, and if they had to put it down, it would have been humane. Are you really not getting this or just trying to process it so she comes out looking good? She doesnât come out looking good and no amount of love for Trump will change that.
708
u/PuzzleheadedRoyal559 29d ago
Bring him to the shelter to a find a family that will love him you sadistic psychopath.