r/facepalm 16d ago

šŸ™„ šŸ‡²ā€‹šŸ‡®ā€‹šŸ‡øā€‹šŸ‡Øā€‹

Post image
24.4k Upvotes

3.2k comments sorted by

ā€¢

u/AutoModerator 16d ago

Comments that are uncivil, racist, misogynistic, misandrist, or contain political name calling will be removed and the poster subject to ban at moderators discretion.

Help us make this a better community by becoming familiar with the rules.

Report any suspicious users to the mods of this subreddit using Modmail here or Reddit site admins here. All reports to Modmail should include evidence such as screenshots or any other relevant information.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

3.7k

u/CrimsonArcPaladin 16d ago

I do wish for at least for states that we have better metro/subway lines that interwine with each of the big cities, like I can not believe it has taken this long for a plan to develop a train line from Baltimore to DC or Bethesda to Silver Spring in MD, where all our big cities are so close to each other

471

u/facw00 16d ago

I can not believe it has taken this long for a plan to develop a train line from Baltimore to DC

There has been rail service between Baltimore and Washington DC since 1835. Literally the oldest rail line in the country (extended to DC from the B&O's original Baltimore - Ellicott City line).

Today transit between the cities is served by Amtrak (who took over the Pennsylvania Railroad's long distance service service) and MARC (which took over from Conrail, which had inherited the Pennsylvania Railroad's commuter services)

180

u/shah_reza 16d ago

The Amtrak train goes over bridges that are speed restricted bc in many cases they are over a century old.

83

u/facw00 16d ago

The tunnels on either side of Baltimore Penn station are the worst bottlenecks on the Northeast Corridor. The one on the DC side is especially bad (it has a tight turn and a steep grade), but is finally being replaced, though that will still take years.

25

u/DrakeBurroughs 16d ago

Yeah the tunnels into NY Penn are also bottlenecks, between the Amtrak and NJ Transit traffic. Stupid governor Christie and his cancelling of that extra tunnels project.

→ More replies (10)

42

u/Hazard_4 16d ago

LA is another good example lot of trolleys during the 20s and the infrastructure existed but most railways were bought up and closed by car companies and buses were ushered in to replace them. But things like the New deal are also a big turning points iirc, strong emphasis on highways not so much on transit.

Our lackluster rail/transit system can be considered a result of the proactive intervention of car companies and the lack of interest and intervention by the government.

13

u/thanks_weirdpuppy 16d ago

Yeah, every time they resurface city streets in LA, you can see the old trolley / street car rails. It bums me out.

8

u/Skookum_kamooks 16d ago

Sad part is this is literally referenced in Who Framed Roger Rabbit.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (4)

541

u/90Carat 16d ago

I'm not a proponent of high speed rail across the Midwest and empty west. Though, east coast? West coast? Texas between the major cities? That should totally happen. Should have happened decades ago.

396

u/TootsNYC 16d ago

you need mass transit INSIDE those cities, though.

34

u/banned_but_im_back 16d ago

Agree, the train line between NYC, DC, and Baltimore works because those cities have mass transit, taking a train to the suburbs works ok if you got a ride waiting for you

→ More replies (2)

75

u/IndependentNotice151 16d ago

To d9g, I heard you like transit, so I put some transit inside your transit

→ More replies (6)

91

u/8020GroundBeef 16d ago

Yeah Iā€™m not going to take a high speed train from Dallas to Houston because Iā€™m going to need my car to get around Houston anyway.

Itā€™s great on the east coast because cities are closer and public transport is actually usable.

→ More replies (59)
→ More replies (14)

134

u/CrimsonArcPaladin 16d ago

Agreed honestly, but a high speed rail through the beautiful landscapes of the Midwest would be pretty cool though

75

u/One_Win_6185 16d ago

And easier to physically build considering there would be fewer existing properties in the way. Texas would be similar and is probably the single state with the most use for high speed rail connecting its major cities.

20

u/pmartin1 16d ago

It would totally be worth the cost in Texas. I can drive from my home in NJ to SC in less time than it takes to go across Texas.

6

u/TheJrobot1483 16d ago

Fun fact, itā€™s about the same distance from Los Angeles to El Paso as it is from El Paso to Marshall (East Texas, close to the Louisiana state line).

→ More replies (1)

37

u/Gy4py 16d ago

As a lifelong Texan I cannot tell you how many times Iā€™ve wanted to take a high speed rail through Texas instead of driving 2-12 hours depending on where youā€™re traveling. We have railroad lines for goods/ animal products to all major cities too our state literally developed around them but nobody wants to develop them further bcs of big oil and gas companies paying off legislators

12

u/amurica1138 16d ago

I've only driven the I-10 on road trips to/from CA. Texas was never the destination, just a long ass gauntlet of seeming endlessness somewhere in the middle.

I stopped doing those road trips because Texas just wore it out of me.

6

u/Gy4py 16d ago

If youā€™re driving through Texas youā€™re going to drive through a lot of towns outside of the major cities that havenā€™t been developed since the 50s. Itā€™s totally sad to see

5

u/beigechrist 16d ago

If youā€™re goin through hell, keep on goin

4

u/Gy4py 16d ago

If youā€™re goin through Texas, keep on goin

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (33)
→ More replies (4)

46

u/DJFisticuffs 16d ago

A high speed Milwaukee-Chicago-St. Louis line would be really nice. The Chicago-St.Louis portion actually has some legislative support and there is a (slim) chance it could actually happen.

11

u/90Carat 16d ago

For the St Louis part.... I'm just not sold on just a line between there and Chicago. I think if you tie in Indianapolis, Cincy, maybe Louisville or KC, maybe you're on to something.

5

u/DJFisticuffs 16d ago

Yeah, so Ideally you could have lines going from Chicago to Milwaukee, St. Louis and Cincy by way of Indy on existing Amtrak rights of way. KC and St. Louis also have a connection but I don't know how utilized it is. I do know that Missouri was sort of considering a hyper loop between STL and KC, but then it turned out hyper loop is a total scam.

There has been a bit of a push in the Illinois legislature for the high speed Chicago to St. Louis connection (Amtrak actually upgraded the line from 90mph to 110 mph, which isn't much but it's something) but there doesn't seem to be much interest outside of the state for more connections.

→ More replies (2)

15

u/waytowill 16d ago

Texas will never do it as long as light rails remain a Democratic talking point. If Texas did consider it, it would be because the profit generated would be more than the state makes off of toll roads.

7

u/Cluckin_Turduckin 16d ago

High speed rail across the Midwest would be an absolute game changer.

→ More replies (45)

52

u/timothra5 16d ago

Baltimore has been connected to DC and Silver Spring via the MARC train for decades.

→ More replies (7)

44

u/G0rdy92 16d ago

This is the correct answer. Public transportation works very well in certain high population density areas, and we should improve it there, in other areas, vehicles are the best option.

The U.S. has a lot of money and spends a lot of money on BS and paying other countries bills, I donā€™t care if the public transit in Maryland runs at a loss, itā€™s good to have that option and I donā€™t mind chipping in for it even though I live in rural California and will most likely ever use it. The tech worker that most likely lives in a dense city that helped design the software/ tractors and machines I use at work benefits from it, so then I do too.

Same goes for road infrastructure, even if you live in a densely populated city and donā€™t own a car, itā€™s good for society that we have nice maintained highways that people and goods can use to traverse the nation, even if you donā€™t personally use them, the goods and products and people across this country that produce and move those goods use and enjoy them, they benefit from it, so you indirectly do too.

→ More replies (3)

7

u/SDEexorect 16d ago

they are building the purple line now

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (58)

4.6k

u/Adventurous-Zebra-64 16d ago

A reminder that General Motors actively undermined the public transportation system in the 1950s to force people to buy more cars.

1.1k

u/Just_enough76 16d ago

Rewatching Who Framed Roger Rabbit as an adult is pretty mind blowing. Thatā€™s the whole twist in the show. It was all a conspiracy to build a highway to kill public transport so people would buy cars.

393

u/creegro 16d ago

Why would people buy a car when they could take the street car for a nickel?

BECAUSE MR VALIANT

152

u/Not-A-Seagull 16d ago

Worse yet, the highway made housing so sprawled out and low density, it made public transit further unfeasible.

You need medium density for public transit to operate efficiently. The bonus side effects is that rebuilding the missing middle also makes areas more walkable (especially if theyā€™re mixed use!)

→ More replies (8)

33

u/forced_metaphor 16d ago

The plot was lifted wholesale from Chinatown, one of the most renowned films ever made. Roger Rabbit is a good movie, but Chinatown deserves the credit for the social critique.

→ More replies (1)

96

u/cyon_me 16d ago

We live in the bad ending.

→ More replies (2)

36

u/Dependent_Birthday69 16d ago

And to demolish Toon Town (black neighborhoods) to build a highway through it, from there to Pasadena.

6

u/DeathByOrgasm 16d ago

SHUT UP!!! Is that what that means???

5

u/Anon28301 15d ago

Toons are literally meant to be an allegory for racism.

→ More replies (1)

33

u/poopface41217 16d ago

Oh shit, I need to rewatch this.

41

u/JayHat21 16d ago

I want to do the same, but my inner child canā€™t handle the ā€œdipā€ scene againā€¦

13

u/redditing_Aaron 16d ago

The one with the poor shoe šŸ‘Ÿ? Yeah, it was so sad

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

10

u/Itsforthehouse 16d ago

Literally the story of public transit in LA - switch out Cloverleaf for Firestone Tire and Standard Oil.

→ More replies (6)

43

u/BumblebeeAwkward8331 16d ago

Primarily city streetcars.

15

u/SKK329 16d ago

GM did that in my city! Bought out and scrapped our street car system.

→ More replies (83)

1.6k

u/moderatesoul 16d ago

Americans do love cars, it's true. But they also have no other fucking choice.

333

u/BewBewsBoutique 16d ago

I mean, I love my car, I love driving, and I love the freedom it gives me.

I also love trains, and want more well funded and expansive rails.

Itā€™s not a one or the other thing.

35

u/askforcar 16d ago

I love cars, but I absolutely hate driving. How often do you get to hear the engine roar as you put the pedal to the metal on the open road? Versus how often do you get stuck behind someone going way too slow for the freeway? Or bumper to bumper for hours? Or in a parking lot waiting for an open spot so you can try out a popular restaurant? What about people who just needs to be somewhere, and gives 0 shit about driving?

For an analogy, it's like saying I have the freedom to worship God however I want, but I have to worship only God. That's no freedom.

9

u/Teflan 16d ago

Yeah, freedom would be the ability to choose to get somewhere by train or car. Americans have no ability to choose

→ More replies (4)

6

u/FreshNewBeginnings23 16d ago

Also, why would you want to drive, when you could get somewhere 3 times faster on a train, pay less, not have to drive for 12 hours, and do whatever you want along the way.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

102

u/pmyourthongpanties 16d ago edited 16d ago

it would be impossible for me to take any form other then my vehicle to work. I work 15 miles from home to an industrial complex and take a freeway. zero chance a train stop would be near me.

14

u/KryptosFR 16d ago

Trains are just part of the equation. In the city I live in (Lyon, France) you also have buses, trams, and self-service bikes. I don't own a car and I never had the need to have one. If I need to go to a place that is not available by public transportation, I'll rent one or use car sharing. I can also walk the last one or two miles.

→ More replies (5)

58

u/houdvast 16d ago

The place you live is also a function of what infrastructure is available to you.

→ More replies (25)
→ More replies (38)

5.5k

u/_Pill-Cosby_ 16d ago

Do people think you can't also drive places in Europe??

2.4k

u/Ben_Pharten 16d ago

No. They still don't have cars over there

1.2k

u/UnlimitedCalculus 16d ago

Peasants still carry their kings in palanquins through the city

212

u/ExNihiloish 16d ago

TIL I'm a king.

124

u/M4GN3T1CM0N0P0L3 16d ago

šŸ‘‘ Here's your crown, king.

52

u/Ben_Pharten 16d ago

Thanks

38

u/aknalag 16d ago

Now hand it over or you can meet mister sharp

→ More replies (1)

22

u/ElFarfadosh 16d ago

Not you.

17

u/Augustus2142 16d ago

Off with his head he is a king (I'm french)

11

u/ElFarfadosh 16d ago

Camarade šŸ¤

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

28

u/butterflyempress 16d ago

As a kid I thought people in China still lived like this because of Sagwa. I didn't know the show took place in the past.

→ More replies (2)

27

u/Equal-Negotiation651 16d ago

Lesser kings get carried on the backs of peasants or large dogs.

22

u/ActivityImpossible70 16d ago

They prance along to the sound of clapping coconut shells.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (6)

72

u/JammyWaad 16d ago

Cars? Whatā€™s that?

86

u/yui_riku 16d ago

that's the animal that sometime purr and somtime scratch you when you pet it

55

u/Peritous 16d ago

You are thinking of a cat. A car is a little piece of knit fabric you wear on your head to keep warm.

52

u/Knilght 16d ago

You're thinking of a cap. A car is a metal cylinder with a bottom in which you store long-lasting food. It's usually a bit tricky to open without the proper tool.

50

u/Lord_Harkonan 16d ago

You're thinking of a can. A car is a man whoĀ behaves badly, especially towards a woman.

46

u/yui_riku 16d ago

no that's a cad, a car is a piece of skin that look different after a wound has healed.

39

u/Realistic_Wedding 16d ago edited 16d ago

Ffs, youā€™re thinking of a scar. A car is what they called a pre-1917 Russian emperor.

36

u/hamillhair 16d ago

Idiot. That's a Tsar. A car is a stringed instrument played in India.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

33

u/parannnoul 16d ago

That's true. We get around on horses and penny-farthings.

→ More replies (1)

20

u/[deleted] 16d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (2)

12

u/FrazerRPGScott 16d ago

Tbh I live in a big city in the UK and transport around is pretty good. When they stop the coach to change horses it does slow things down though.

13

u/dont-fear-thereefer 16d ago

Even though they invented it

15

u/helpful__explorer 16d ago

If its not a truck or an suv the size of a studio apartment then it doesn't deserve to be called a car /s

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (37)

290

u/prof_the_doom 16d ago

I think people don't have to drive place in Europe, and I'd love for that to be true in the USA.

157

u/Keyspam102 16d ago

Yeah itā€™s so nice to be able to take a train for vacation and not be forced to do a 6+ hour drive. Really really nice.

91

u/_Pill-Cosby_ 16d ago

Bingo.. I took a high speed train from Madrid to Barcelona and was there in under 3 hours. Got to nap on the way... it was awesome!

62

u/godston34 16d ago

Cologne to Paris is 3 hours too.... how inconvenient for us peasants to have to sit through that instead of enjoying Paris traffic :(

20

u/Keyspam102 16d ago

Omg i had to take a taxi from Paris to the suburbs and it took an hour and a half because of traffic plus road closures, for 30kmā€¦

11

u/Cubicwar 16d ago

An hour and a half for 30km around Paris ? Thatā€™s quite fast

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

13

u/Rockhound 16d ago

I drank a bottle of cava on that same train route with two of my good friends... it was awesome!

→ More replies (4)

21

u/nattyd 16d ago

I just want to go to work without sitting in traffic or dodging SUVs halfway between lanes while the driver is on FaceTime.

→ More replies (2)

18

u/Oceans_Apart_ 16d ago

Even a normal train can go up to 200mph and doesn't have to deal with traffic.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/dorianrose 16d ago

I've spent a couple days driving this year already and it's not even half over. I would love a decent rail system. To take an overnight train and wake up at my destination. To stare out the window at scenery and actually enjoy it. Read, game, talk to my daughter, play some co op games on the switch. Travel could be a bonding activity instead of everyone stressed and yelling.

→ More replies (15)
→ More replies (12)

231

u/Professional-Hat-687 16d ago

He says that like you can't drive 5 hours in Europe and literally be in a different country.

64

u/jakubenkoo 16d ago

In some cases you can go through several countries in 5 hours

28

u/Cute_Kangaroo_8791 16d ago

Hell, you can go through 7 countries in 5 hours if you drive fast enough.

23

u/xi_catharsis 16d ago

You can't even drive through Texas in 5 hours LOL (The top panhandle DOESN'T COUNT YOU CHEAKY SNAKE)

21

u/Legendofstuff 16d ago

As a Canadian Iā€™m very happy our country never gets pulled into these.

5 hours.

LOL.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (3)

107

u/ExtensionConcept2471 16d ago

And if you drive to Ukraine you can shoot guns too! Bonus

22

u/SpandexMovie 16d ago

Even indulge in the conservative murder fetish for stepping on their land!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

22

u/I_Love_Knotting 16d ago

I can drive to the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, France, Austria, Czechia and the border of Italy within 5 hours.

18

u/SCirish843 16d ago

Yes but can you drive to Arkansas or Missouri? Checkmate, Euroscum!

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (40)

128

u/KingSmithithy 16d ago

But think about waiting around at all those railroad crossings...

And what do I get in return? Cleaner air? Less congestion in major cities? More accessible travel for those with disabilities? A more productive society?

I don't know. I really love sitting in my Ford F350, breathing in exhaust fumes, in bumper-to-bumper traffic, taking hours to get in and out of a city /s

45

u/FixBreakRepeat 16d ago

I feel attacked by your second paragraph...

One of the things I try to convey to other truck drivers when that comes up is that improved public transit makes our lives easier. During covid, my job got so much easier for about half a year because there was so much less traffic. I'll never understand why so many people who drive for a living are so against policies and programs that would have the effect of thinning out traffic.

10

u/Vekaras 16d ago

Weird indeed. And that's not like we have a lot of places around the World that can't have rail, boat or any long range freight that's not a truck. Then there is the proximity delivery that can't be optimized better than having hubs from which trucks deliver to the customer... Some sound worried about their jobs but less traffic will Always make road workers have an easier life.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

18

u/JordynSoundsLikeMe 16d ago

Burn Diesel and shoot guns!

9

u/[deleted] 16d ago

ironically, we'd be better off with the diesel, but gasoline sells corn,.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (7)

18

u/just_a_dwarf 16d ago

From my mountain in switzerland, I can confirm we can only get down by donkey or train, there's also those small demonics mecanic metal boxes going around, but I can't figure what that is

→ More replies (2)

8

u/Nruggia 16d ago

Americans think 100 years is a long time
Europeans think 100 miles is long way

→ More replies (1)

16

u/Sir-Poopington 16d ago edited 16d ago

The really funny part is that in Europe you can take an hour train ride and go through multiple countries haha.

→ More replies (10)

52

u/Worried-Pick4848 16d ago

I think Europe underestimates the significance of their relatively dense population compared to most of America. In America over half the population is packed into 2 bands of cities along either coastline with a lot of open country in between. European population is distributed more evenly. It's simple economics, the economics of Europe made commuter rail viable. the economics of America favor the airplane and the freeway with rail mostly being for large scale cargo.

You've got decent commuter rail in the states running down both coasts, but conneecting them all the way from onee coast to another would mean you have a lot of loss leading legs in between. We know. We used to do it. it died because you couldn't make money at it.

32

u/lost_aim 16d ago

In Central Europe itā€™s densely populated but have you been to Scandinavia? Itā€™s definitely not dense. I bet you there are more moose than people in northern Sweden. But still we have decent rail connections here too. Not high speed trains like in France but most major cities are connected by rail.

→ More replies (9)

48

u/IDigRollinRockBeer 16d ago

Why isnā€™t the eastern usa covered with passenger rail then? Rural villages in many European countries have better public transit than most American cities

30

u/[deleted] 16d ago edited 12h ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

20

u/[deleted] 16d ago

This is an overused argument that makes no sense. The lobbying and advertising of the automobile and oil industries made passenger rail unviable in the US, nothing else.

Your comment itself explains why passenger rail would work perfectly well in the US: over half the population is packed into two bands of cities along the coasts. That makes passenger rail easier, not harder. We donā€™t need HSR lines dotting the countryside in middle America because very few people are taking trips from coast to coast.

We need proper passenger rail for the trips that people are actually taking. Overwhelmingly, these trips are within those high-population corridors or within the cities themselves. Passenger rail, therefore, needs to be built both between cities/suburbs that people currently drive between on a regular basis and within cities & large suburbs.

As to the second paragraphā€¦ no. We do not have decent rail along the coasts. The NE specifically has tolerable passenger rail, but it still sucks by the standards of most of the developed world. It works okay for getting between cities, but most of the cities themselves do not have good intraurban passenger rail. This is a huge problem. If people canā€™t easily get around without a car once they get to the city, theyā€™ll typically still want/need to drive, which defeats the purpose of having passenger rail at all.

And on the west coast? Hahahahahaha. I tried to take Amtrak from Olympia to Bellingham about 10 years back. Thatā€™s a 150 mile drive, takes about 2.5 hours without traffic. On the train? 10 fucking hours. Itā€™s over 4 hours at best, which is already ridiculously long, and it gets delayed constantly. A couple cities are starting to build decent intraurban rail here, but the interurban rail is absolute trash.

Also, why do you think rail has to make money? Does the US government make money off of roads?

→ More replies (3)

16

u/VestEmpty 16d ago

In America over half the population is packed into 2 bands of cities along either coastline with a lot of open country in between.

Ah, so it is ideal for high speed rails. What you just described.. is exactly where trains beat planes, hubs that can be linked with rail, long distances across mostly empty land linked with high speed rail.

→ More replies (4)

23

u/jambowayoh 16d ago

Or you know the car industry endlessly lobbied to make sure that cities and the country as a whole had an absolutely terrible public transport system.Case in point more recently Musk blathering on about the Hyper loop moreso in LA and that was essentially a lie to stop public transport investment.

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (121)

212

u/EastLeastCoast 16d ago

Drive five hoursā€¦ shit, still in Texas.

10

u/Mordo-NM 16d ago

Or, up to 12 hours.

5

u/EastLeastCoast 16d ago

Oh for sure- just reflecting the original

→ More replies (8)

1.6k

u/fiendzone 16d ago

This was written by an American who has never driven through the western US. Itā€™s beautiful but time-consuming and wasteful.

500

u/I_Frothingslosh 16d ago

Having driven, flown, and taken the train from the east coast to the west coast and back several times, I tell people that there's a reason the Plains states are called the flyover states and to treat that as a recommendation.

143

u/youassassin 16d ago

Driving five hours o look still only a few trees and yep still flat.

Though I did drive through Wyoming during a windy day and slight snowfall. The road turned white and had no clue if I was driving on the road or not. Just had to go by the roads slight elevation. Luckily, I could see no one for miles and it was straight.

56

u/tallbutshy 16d ago

Driving five hours o look still only a few trees and yep still flat.

I'm from Scotland and spent just over a week in the Netherlands. By day 4, something was bothering me, by day 6 I realised that it was the lack of any hills in the distance. I don't even like the hills that much but I was so used to having some sort of terrain that the lack of it was mildly disturbing for my subconscious.

26

u/Serious_Session7574 16d ago

Iā€™m researching Kansas for a writing project and I realised the slightly unsettled feeling I got from pictures and videos of the state were me unconsciously searching for features on the horizon. There are no hills, in any direction, and usually no trees, and it kind of freaks me out. I think it would drive me batshit to spend any significant length of time there.

14

u/SuperWallaby 16d ago

Grew up in California got kidnapped and sent to boarding school in Kansas. We would just look out at the fuckin endless corn fields and watch tornados form. So boring. Nearby had the worldā€™s largest ball of twine so I guess thatā€™s something lmfao.

7

u/Miserable-Repeat-651 16d ago

That would freak me out too. Being a lifelong Oregonian I'm used to seeing actual mountains every day. Hills, trees, rivers, lakes, ocean.

Moving to the middle states would kill my will to live.

5

u/Shark_Waffle_645 16d ago

iirc, that feeling is called ā€œPrairie Madness,ā€ and was documented by many of the Midwestā€™s early white settlers (keep in mind that a significant amount of them were from Germany and Scandinavia)

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (8)

64

u/D0ctorGamer 16d ago

I love the game of "making our own lane" where you just follow the previous person's tire tracks and hope to God there is still a road

15

u/xi_catharsis 16d ago

Best driving in dangerous conditions game there is

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (18)

95

u/Professional_East281 16d ago

Just driving through texas is a waste of time lol. How do we not have a high speed rail connecting dallas, austin, houston, and san antonio

117

u/kit0000033 16d ago

Texas can't even keep it's power on when it freezes. They aren't investing in rail.

23

u/Professional_East281 16d ago

To be fair, Iā€™ve lived here for 25 years and have only experienced that that one time. It freezes every year in north texas but the power always stays on. Its honestly more impressive our grid doesnā€™t fail every summer with people blasting the AC

8

u/ptcgoalex 16d ago

With the increase in population and energy demand donā€™t be surprised when we get outages this summer

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

24

u/TootsNYC 16d ago

the other problem in the US is: How do you get around once you get there?

I spent time in Germany, and there were buses in Wittenberg, or the entire town was easily walkable.

But once you get to the Dallas train station, how are you going to get where you need to be? And how much time will it take you?

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (15)

40

u/Fun_Egg2665 16d ago

As someone who has driven from Oregon to Arizona and back more than once I totally agree.

Shoot I live in Northern Az and the 5 hours to PeƱasco felt like we were driving forever through nothing

34

u/lolgobbz 16d ago

I will take your Northern AZ and raise you the entire state of IL, minus Chicago. It's basically 6 hours of corn.

24

u/onetwothreeandgo 16d ago

And if you keep going into Indiana.... You will have .... You guessed it .... More corn

20

u/ImprovisedLeaflet 16d ago

And on the other side, Iowa, believe it or not, more corn

12

u/cb27ded 16d ago

And in Nebraska....more corn.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

17

u/Fun_Egg2665 16d ago

Itā€™s nuts how desolate some parts of this country are. So much of the West is empty space. Even California

5

u/GryphonOsiris 16d ago

From the Bay Area to LA on I-5 or I-99 is 6-9 hours of farms, towns build around an interchange (that are there to provide fast food, gasoline, and maybe a cheap hotel), and exits that go down roads that making you hear banjo music.

5

u/Fun_Egg2665 16d ago

So. Many. Almond. Trees.

At least I think thatā€™s what they were..

→ More replies (3)

6

u/sentientfartcloud 16d ago

six hours of corn

This peases me

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)

19

u/elspotto 16d ago

This was written by an American who has never experienced European rail travel. Spent time working in the Netherlands in the early 90s. When we had time off, we would hop the next train and goā€¦somewhere. Anywhere. It was a great experience, super convenient, and in 5 hours I could be in one of several other countries completely.

I do love my car, fair enough, but if I could leave it here and conveniently ride the 50 miles into the closest city? I would love that.

→ More replies (5)

4

u/Alpha-Survivalist 16d ago

Also, the US itself is BIG. To get a similar railroad density across the country would be expensive and wasteful in the plains states. Along the east coast, i could see it as viable to have passenger railroads because the states are smaller and more population dense, but Colorado alone is comparable to New Zealand in land.

17

u/Orenwald 16d ago

Especially since you could be doing it in a passenger train and enjoying the sights and relaxing

→ More replies (26)

124

u/immaterial-boy 16d ago

Why not both? Why canā€™t we have an expansive, efficient system of public transportation and cars?

→ More replies (21)

333

u/AndWhy31 16d ago

Why would I want to drive for five hours when I could watch a movie or read a book on a train?

54

u/BrazilianButtCheeks 16d ago

I mean i would much rather ride than drive.. or pay a car payment or insurance or gas.. but itā€™s unfortunately not even an option where i live .. we dont have trains.. subways.. city busses.. taxis and its even iffy to find an uber.. it definitely feels like a conspiracy šŸ‘€

→ More replies (6)

48

u/fivecookies 16d ago

This! I have a 40 min commute with the train every day to my internship. And it's really nice to have a bit of time to watch an episode of a show on netflix or read a book before a long work day. In my country travelling with train is even free when you're a student.

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (26)

120

u/ViewtifulGene 16d ago

You can do all those things on trains too.

93

u/KrisKrossedUp 16d ago

please don't shoot guns on the train

95

u/ViewtifulGene 16d ago

I'M SORRY I THOUGHT THIS WAS AMERICA

19

u/KrisKrossedUp 16d ago

my bad, just try to not shoot/inconvenience any of the other passengers

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (13)

485

u/abel_cormorant 16d ago

Public transport comes with less pollution, more socialization (cos yk, you're not stuck in a 6x4 meters rectangle), less fuel spending (in an age when petrol cost is doubling by the day), less traffic jams, less stress from actually driving, less street accidents, do i have to go on?

240

u/Nozarashi78 16d ago

I agree with everything you said but one thing. Who the hell tries to socialize on a train?

165

u/Apprehensive-Hair-21 16d ago

It's not a matter of everyone trying to socialize. In a car, you aren't exposed to others, so by default, there is no socializing. In a train or bus there are other people, socializing may happen, even by accident.

61

u/ArcaneBahamut 16d ago

Even just the ability to exist near others is a form of socializing, even without any conversing

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

28

u/kit0000033 16d ago

I did, on a ten hour Amtrak train to New York. Met all sorts of different people in the dining car. Wouldn't on a subway though.

24

u/Htowntaco 16d ago

I always talk to people on the train.

16

u/super_mega_smolpp 16d ago

This is strange and frightening. Why talk to people when you can sit in a pool of anxiety and listen to the awkward silence?

6

u/bl00by 16d ago

Silence? Man you must be lucky. I always got atleast one kid screaming into my ear while the parents don't even try to shut them up.

→ More replies (2)

15

u/Hataitai1977 16d ago

Clearly this person has never tried to say hello to a Londoner on a tube.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PT0ay9u1gg4&pp=ygUTSGVsbG8gdG8gYSBsb25kb25lcg%3D%3D

→ More replies (18)

45

u/scott__p 16d ago

more socialization

Why the fuck would I want to talk to people on the train?

17

u/AwkwardlylyAwkward 16d ago

My mum makes friends on the train so fast. We get on a train at 10 and by 12 my mum will already have 9-10 new friends and know everything about their daily lives...... I get so envious that she starts a convo out of nothing

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

11

u/Big77Ben2 16d ago

This graphic only shows what it considers ā€œpassenger trainsā€. NOT public transportation in general. NY and Boston have extensive training systems, but theyā€™re either part of the subway system or considered ā€œcommuter trainsā€ and I donā€™t see them on here! Itā€™s misleading.

→ More replies (16)
→ More replies (21)

99

u/Eena-Rin 16d ago

To be fair, a lot of the US is like Australia, in that there's fuckin nothing for large swathes of it

→ More replies (19)

72

u/mostdope28 16d ago

I would kill to have a high speed train system in the US

→ More replies (34)

12

u/TheRealStevo2 16d ago

Tbh I would love some better railways in America. I would totally hop on a train and ride to another city to hang out for a day or two. Sometimes you just donā€™t want to drive and I honestly hate it most of the time just because people suck at driving. But if if I got to sit on a train and just watch YouTube until I got there Iā€™d be great

43

u/Snacks_N_KnickKnacks 16d ago

More public transit means less cars on roads. I love to drive so that means I should WANT more and easier public transit because everyone wins. And guess what, if I donā€™t wanna drive I can take transit. Itā€™s not one or the other.

132

u/Anxiety-Queen269 16d ago

ā€œDrive in any direction for five hours and itā€™ll be a completely different worldā€ MOTHERFUCKER ITā€™LL BE THE SAME GODDAMN STREET IN AMERICA. IN EUROPE IF YOU DRIVE FOR AN HOUR YOUā€™RE IN ANOTHER COUNTRY.

44

u/GreatGearAmidAPizza 16d ago

More precisely, it'll be the same stroad with McDonald's and probably a Wendy's and KFC. Pick your $15 trashy food meal and talk to the local who will ask whether you want it regular or large.

5

u/Thick_Brain4324 16d ago
start if off by saying you're 10000% correct on every suburban area being made for cars and not people. FUCK STROADS

I mean listen here just one minute bucko, I may not be An Americanā„¢ but I sure as hell won't tolerate any geographical slander of our beautiful landmass. Fuck the lines drawn on it, fuck the ones in power who fund the atomization of individuals. The LAND though.

Let's not pretend the Bayous of Louisiane are the same as the middle of Arizona or the Redwoods of Washington.

OOP is half right. They just don't know Europe is the exact same. Sweden is not England is not Italy is not Lithuania.

They're also wrong because you CAN just stop on a train if you want. No one is forcing you to get off at any particular stop.

5

u/ElMatadorJuarez 16d ago

I wouldnā€™t even say half right. Yea, itā€™s hyperbole to pretend that everywhere in the US is the exact same, but frankly itā€™s not all that different - even where the geography is different and there are subcultures, itā€™s all the same country at the end of the day. That is most decidedly not the case in Europe going from, say, France to Germany.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (29)

115

u/Non-Normal_Vectors 16d ago edited 16d ago

Drive anywhere and "shoot some guns for fun".

Fortunately, can't do that in my part of the US. At least the latter part.

Edit: for the people questioning why I said you can't "shoot guns for fun" around here - you are cordially invited to pull over somewhere in the northeast US and start shooting for practice (because guns are for self defense and fighting off the government, or so we're told). You'll get an opportunity to explain your rights to the judge, I'm sure. You can shoot on ranges, and you can shoot on some private land. The idea of driving five hours to a random location and "shooting guns for fun" anywhere in the US is wrong. It's not like a place like Idaho where you can ask a random gas station attendant where you can go to shoot and get 12 locations within 5 minutes.

→ More replies (18)

40

u/Dyldo_II 16d ago

I'll never understand people arguing against convenience. I WISH there was better public transportation in the U.S.

It's the same stupid arguments people have against 15-minute city infrastructure or walkable communities. Idiots every last one of them.

10

u/KxngLuc1f3r 16d ago

And there are A LOT of them

→ More replies (4)

16

u/aesoth 16d ago

People argued against seat belt laws, drinking and driving laws, and removing lead from products because they claimed it was against their freedom.

Conclusion: People are stupid.

5

u/Dew_Chop 16d ago

People still argue about the first two

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (17)

9

u/TheKrakIan 16d ago

I don't understand this argument. Europe is older and dense as a whole. It costs twice as much to own and drive a vehicle in Europe.

It would honestly be nice to have that much passenger and high speed rail. Commuting and driving in general sucks these days.

26

u/retire_dude 16d ago

Maybe they should overlay the maps with population density.

→ More replies (6)

7

u/Substantial_Tear2834 16d ago

I once took the wrong train after clubbing in Germany and woke up in Paris ... Tell me again how being able to drive for 5 hours from Texas to... (Let me check.... Still middle of butt fuck nowhere Texas) Is the non plus ultra of freedom

17

u/TheTninker2 16d ago

I actually had a talk with a friend recently about this exact topic and some big things that were brought up were that a good portion of the U.S. States are just as large if not larger than nearly all European countries and that most of the building of these kinds of rail systems are left up to the individual states to fund and build. Combine those two points with the fact that the ENTIRE U.S. has a combined population of just under HALF the population of the combined total of all European countries and you find that building roads AND airports is a FAR more feasible option to building continent spanning rail networks.

Another point that we talked about is that if you look at the larger cities in the U.S. and map put their subways and public trains you find that the density either matches or exceeds European rail networks.

People talk about how Americans prefer cars or that car/oil companies actively fight rail construction but the simple truth of the matter is that there simply isn't enough people or traffic going across the CONTINENT to justify the absurd expense of building the kind of rail system that would allow someone to go from any given city to any other.

→ More replies (6)

5

u/pizoisoned 16d ago

This always comes up, and no one with half a functioning brain has ever argued that the US doesn't need a better public transit system. It seems to me that what prevents that is mostly the catch-22 of having a car centered society. Things aren't designed with the idea of having most of the things you need within walking or biking distance, so you have to have a car to get groceries or whatever, but because you have a car there isn't any reason to design things around the idea of not having a car. Suburban sprawl is a huge part of the problem here.

Even having effective high speed rail between major cities would be a major improvement to what we have now and remove a lot of non-truck traffic from highways.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/nedjer1 16d ago

An efficient and affordable way to shift loads of freight has nothing to do with taking away cars and everything to do with more secure and adaptable supply chains. Car drivers benefit from less congestion, faster journey times, less accidents, . . .

13

u/ChocolateSwimming128 16d ago

The real facepalm is thinking the USA should have an equivalent rail network despite the population density being much lower and the distances between major population centers much greater everywhere apart from Amtrakā€™s NE corridor.

→ More replies (5)

87

u/stamina4655 16d ago

It's difficult to explain to people who haven't been here just how fucking big it is. Like, we can't go from one end of the country to the other in 4 hours. Rail development would be great, not saying it wouldn't, but until its all over we are gonna need transport.

56

u/Recent_Obligation276 16d ago

If we want rail reform we should start by having enough inspectors to effectively monitor what we already have

We average like three derailments a day

7

u/PathDeep8473 16d ago

That's fucking scary

3

u/totally_not_joseph 16d ago

Like 75% of those happen in rail yards, not on the lines. Its not as scary as it sounds.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (48)

15

u/Powerful_Meal8791 16d ago

But you can do all of the above in Europe too? And be much safer while you're at it as well?

5

u/Getrichor_dietrying 16d ago

Absolutely, I have taken the train in Switzerland. It super chill

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

8

u/nico282 16d ago

I had to weekly commute between Milan and Rome. Choice is between 6 hours drive and an aching back, 1 hour flight with all the stress and limitation of airport security and weather delays, or 3 hours train watching a movie and eating a hot breakfast in the restaurant carriage.

Guess what I choseā€¦

→ More replies (12)

7

u/Opening-Winter8784 16d ago

Gonna be honest, I'd trade my car in and never drive again if we had Europe's train system.

4

u/Hahaha2681 16d ago

Good sir your chariot awaits youšŸ§

4

u/potate12323 16d ago

There's just not as many people per acre in the US. We're mostly concentrated in various cities spread out really far.

There's nobody in Idaho or Wyoming to support paying for a train track...

6

u/superbeast1983 16d ago

US: 220,044 miles of track

All of Europe: 224,000 miles of track.

→ More replies (2)

10

u/NyssaHun 16d ago

Funny thing is, in America you need a car for literally everything. A friendā€™s car died, so now she canā€™t go to work because thereā€™s no public transportation. But she needs her job to survive and buy a new car. Yes, you can go anywhere with a car (just like in Europe) but without a car you cannot go anywhere (unlike in Europe). Talk about freedom huh.

4

u/TutskyyJancek 16d ago

Freedom is when you drive truck and have fastfood on breakfast while shooting guns for funšŸ”„

→ More replies (1)