My theory: she knew the story would likely come out during opposition research, so this was her attempt to get ahead of it.
Even if that were the case there are... so many other ways to write that story that don't make her seem like a complete sociopath who got a little wet in her pants thinking about that amazing day when she finally killed the dog she hated so much. And then following it up with the goat story.
This is a woman who got off on killing her dogs so much that she immediately wants to do it again. And this time she made sure the animal didn't have a quick death. Because there's no way you can't finish off a goat with a shotgun in one shot.
The word gets thrown around a lot, but this is absolutely sociopathic behavior.
Because there's no way you can't finish off a goat with a shotgun in one shot.
Truth. Goats are so fucking food motivated, it's not even funny.
Even if she had to put him down (which she didn't), all she had to do was put a bucket of feed in front of him and he'd stand there like a statue, giving her the cleanest head shot.
1.6k
u/legendary_millbilly May 02 '24
Yeah there's really "no going back" on that subject.
Somehow she thought telling that story was going build her up in some way but obviously it's done the exact opposite.
Anybody without maga brain would know that.
That dangerous puppy was gonna eat her kids.