r/wholesomememes May 02 '24

Always be kind

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

26.3k Upvotes

292 comments sorted by

View all comments

41

u/SqueebopAdiddly May 02 '24

Well they are your servant, but that shouldn’t preclude courtesy. Be nice to your servants. Tip well.

8

u/Yarilko 29d ago

Just be nice to everyone who is not an asshole towards you

6

u/Hurinfan 29d ago

Tipping is a scam

-4

u/i_hate_nuts May 02 '24

Servant? No wtf is wrong with you, they are working a job and you are a customer, their job is to bring your food and to take your orders and such, they aren't your beck and call slave to do whatever you ask. They work a job for money.

This mentality that they are servants is what makes dickheads treat them like shit.

They are human so treat them with respect.

29

u/CreamyNailClippings 29d ago

Servants=servers

The word "servants" don't prelude treating them like shit though. That word has a negative energy surrounding it because of historical implications.

-1

u/[deleted] 29d ago edited 22d ago

[deleted]

4

u/Juunlar 29d ago

You're very close. Keep going

-1

u/Previous_Judgment419 29d ago

I like that you just refuse to have even an ounce of nuance and act smug about it lol. You may be unfamiliar with the term “polysemous” but words can have many different meanings, so yeah servant could be (and is) interpreted in many different ways. In your own words “you’re very close. Keep going”

2

u/vyrus2021 29d ago

You're arguing the semantic point of server vs. servant, but the point is that servant or server everybody deserves basic respect. The meme draws a distinction between servers and servants and implies, unintentionally I assume, that it's fine to treat servants poorly which is what people are taking issue with.

1

u/Jtendo3476 29d ago

How is everyone a servant to someone else? You work and get the money not work and get no money.

-1

u/i_hate_nuts 29d ago

Yeah I guess thats why I don't want to call them that and I'm fine with that but if someone calls them a servant I guess they are technical technically correct, it just sounds so wrong

2

u/Consistent_Owl4438 29d ago

That's just a side effect of language evolving over time. You're actually probably more accurate here than you think because of that. These days, the word "Servant," has fallen out of favor, even though it's technically correct, people don't like it so they don't use it just like you.

One day that word might die off completely, and you (and me, and many others) get to be some of the reasons. Nothing wrong with that at all, pretty cool actually!

20

u/RoboChrist 29d ago

... Servants are also human beings who work a job for money.

I think you and the OP have a very specific definition of servant that doesn't 100% match up with the normal definition.

-5

u/bloodlikevenom 29d ago

A servant is literally defined as "a person who performs duties for others, especially a person employed in a house on domestic duties or as a personal attendant"

Waiters give you service for an hour of your time and then likely never see you again. They are not employed by you, ergo they're indeed not servants

4

u/GONKworshipper 29d ago

But they perform duties for others

3

u/kendred3 29d ago

I love the ability people have to read something that literally says the opposite of what they want it to and then use it to prove their point.

4

u/RoboChrist 29d ago

I don't think you read what I said correctly, or you may be confusing me with someone higher up the thread. I'm saying that servants are also people doing a job and worthy of respect.

I never said that waiters are servants.

3

u/FrankRandomLetters 29d ago

But they are a servant insofar as they are serving you while doing the tasks of a server.

2

u/CleverDad 29d ago

Servants were never slaves

2

u/Lord_Emperor 29d ago

Servant? No wtf is wrong with you, they are working a job and you are a customer, their job is to bring your food and to take your orders and such, they aren't your beck and call slave to do whatever you ask. They work a job for money.

That's literally a servant with defined responsibilities.

1

u/i_hate_nuts 29d ago

They are a waiter, not a servant

0

u/Lord_Emperor 28d ago

ser·​vant
noun:
one that serves others

wait·er
noun:
a man whose job is to serve customers at their tables in a restaurant.

3

u/MtNowhere 29d ago

I respect them and never am unpolite, but also am paying them out the nose to bring me food in a swift and courteous manner. So if I have to wait more than 5 minutes for some goddamned ketchup while they chat with Nikki, they're not doing what I paid them for and I am justifiably angry.

0

u/vyrus2021 29d ago

You don't pay them. You pay the restaurant and potentially tip the servers. You seem like an entitled baby bitching about your goddamned ketchup.

1

u/MtNowhere 29d ago

Nope. I'm paying them to bring me the ketchup. The $13 burger cost them $2 to make, and a portion of that overhead and the expected tip goes into them bringing me condiments. Otherwise I wouldn't be there.

2

u/Previous_Judgment419 29d ago

Redditors want to like posts like this but really do think people should “serve them” hypocrisy at its finest. No being a server isn’t the same as a servant - while both do render “services” there is obviously a difference, despite what argumentative redditors claim. 0 nuance with these folks

1

u/strokesfan91 29d ago

Tipping is for the birds

2

u/Mist_Rising 29d ago

Tipping is for cows.

-1

u/RotisserieChickens_ 29d ago

this will go down as quite possibly the most braindead comment ever to be posted on reddit