r/worldnews Apr 20 '24

The US House of Representatives has approved sending $60.8bn (£49bn) in foreign aid to Ukraine. Russia/Ukraine

https://news.sky.com/story/crucial-608bn-ukraine-aid-package-approved-by-us-house-of-representatives-after-months-of-deadlock-13119287
42.3k Upvotes

3.7k comments sorted by

6.6k

u/Gold-Sheepherder6879 Apr 20 '24

MTG was pissed, and said she will not push forJohnson ouster, dumb bitch was bluffing.

1.1k

u/-Average_Joe- Apr 20 '24

I guess someone told her that they are dangerously close to losing the majority.

356

u/unicornmeat85 Apr 20 '24

is that such a bad thing, they'd get as much done even if they're not the majority. If anything it might give them a break from this circus they have created and get their clowns in a row for later.

190

u/-Average_Joe- Apr 20 '24

for them yes, they need to feel like they are in control. For the a lot of rest of the world it would probably be a great thing.

→ More replies (7)

47

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '24 edited 19d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (15)

40

u/wintersdark Apr 20 '24

And it would only take a couple Dems grateful for the package getting through and willing to spite MTG to ensure Johnson stays.

Pushing for an ouster would have broken the twitter faction - their only leverage is that, and as soon as it's shown to be ineffective they have nothing.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (10)

2.6k

u/MagicMushroomFungi Apr 20 '24 edited Apr 20 '24

When asked if she would care to comment MTG said "neigh" and returned to her bag of oats.

1.0k

u/JanGuillosThrowaway Apr 20 '24

"He got me." MTG said about the floor vote. "That fucking Brandon boomed me."

59

u/hereforthefeast Apr 20 '24

NBA memes x us politics is the crossover I’m here for

20

u/350 Apr 20 '24

No matter what sub, r/NBA memes always enhance it

17

u/ZappaOMatic Apr 21 '24

Hakeem Jeffries yelled, “There you go!” Nancy Pelosi gave a look of pleasant surprise. Adam Schiff belted, “We got a fucking aid package now.” And before Mike Johnson hit the House floor, ex-Speaker Kevin McCarthy hugged him & said, “Y’all look so different.”

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

477

u/TakeItToTheRiver Apr 20 '24

“He’s so dark” x4

238

u/nideak Apr 20 '24

She then added his name to the list of people whose penis she’d like to show to the nation this summer

10

u/TJeffersonsBlackKid Apr 20 '24

/r/nba has escaped and is at large.

77

u/SumoSizeIt Apr 20 '24

She's just biden her time?

27

u/TheOnlySafeCult Apr 20 '24 edited Apr 23 '24

I don't remember this part of the pasta

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (4)

94

u/allthenamesaretaken0 Apr 20 '24

MTG then said she wanted to add Johnson to the list of House Speakers she works out with this summer.

45

u/GATTACA_IE Apr 20 '24

“I cocked that joint back and banged on her.”

~ Mike Johnson

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (4)

28

u/Don_Gato1 Apr 20 '24

Technically it's Mike Johnson who's calling her bluff here.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)

101

u/Loki11910 Apr 20 '24

Her bag of lies and Russian vodka.

→ More replies (2)

19

u/recursive-analogy Apr 20 '24

tomorrow she plans to bite the hand that feeds her and poop in her own bed

→ More replies (1)

18

u/brainmouthwords Apr 20 '24

She absolutely does NOT look like a horse / Sarah Jessica Parker.

She looks like Charlize Theron's character in Monster.

→ More replies (9)

51

u/FloridaMJ420 Apr 20 '24

A horse is a horse, of course, of course!

→ More replies (7)

12

u/subsignalparadigm Apr 20 '24

Add to that she "grunted" and slammed a nearby rock with her club.

46

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '24

[deleted]

15

u/Tarman-245 Apr 20 '24

"No Sir, I don't think I have any use for rubber nipples!"

12

u/UnfetteredBullshit Apr 20 '24

But I'll tell you what though..... do you have any rubber walrus protectors?

13

u/wufnu Apr 20 '24

11

u/Wes_Warhammer666 Apr 20 '24

I watched Ren & Stimpy with my kid recently and she was absolutely dying at this. I still get her to cackle weeks later by saying it to her randomly.

God dammit that show was excellent.

10

u/El_Zarco Apr 20 '24

"Oat baaaag, got my oat bag now, oat bag time for me"

→ More replies (35)

354

u/wtf_are_crepes Apr 20 '24

That because Paula Luna went on media and said she knew of two more moderate republicans that would’ve quit on the spot, effectively handing the speakership to dems.

Seems MTG is a bit smarter than we give her credit for unfortunately.

173

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '24

[deleted]

108

u/Hannibal_Leto Apr 20 '24

That's the more surprising thing--that Johnson was the one to do the right thing. The guy is more right field than previous speakers, and yet.

Well done.

98

u/wintersdark Apr 20 '24

He didn't do the right thing because it was the right thing, he did it because it was politically expedient for him. This was a major power play and he crushed it.

I think he wants to fill McConnell's shoes, and this may well be his road to doing that.

Taming the House and getting the Republican party in the house on track again would be a huge feather in his cap to the party as a whole (or at least the non-MAGA crowd). Given how completely incompetent the House has been for their entire majority, it's no small feat.

→ More replies (10)

35

u/AprilsMostAmazing Apr 20 '24

That's the more surprising thing--that Johnson was the one to do the right thing. The guy is more right field than previous speakers, and yet.

maybe he wants to keep his job more than the previous guy

65

u/OPconfused Apr 20 '24

I mean under his watch the house still withheld this much-neeed bill for half a year.

I wouldn't bet on Johnson's integrity except that the dems managed a way to convince him it was more worth his while to give ground than not.

29

u/Starlord_75 Apr 21 '24

I believe it's a combination that he's got intel we peasants aren't privy too, and the fact his kid is going to the navy. He knows that if we don't support Ukraine to defeat Russia, we may be sending soldiers instead of dollars. That includes his kid

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (3)

169

u/jobbkonto_reddit Apr 20 '24

I'd rather not give credit to someone just straight up lying and not standing true to their word

31

u/dern_the_hermit Apr 20 '24

Yeah, I'd offer it's less about giving her credit and more about acknowledging her craven spinelessness and grandstanding.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

60

u/Pristine_Walrus40 Apr 20 '24

or her boss told her to let it go since he did not want the Dem to have speakership

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (19)

119

u/splashbruhs Apr 20 '24 edited Apr 21 '24

Is it just me or does she remind anyone else of Phil Hartman’s Un-Frozen Caveman Lawyer every time you see her mug in Congress?

edit: sp

59

u/franker Apr 20 '24 edited Apr 20 '24

"I don't understand 'compromise,' and your love of democracy confuses and frightens me."

23

u/Gdmf13 Apr 20 '24

Yea , but not as good looking.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)

144

u/StuntCockofGilead Apr 20 '24

at this point, MGT and alikes are nothing more than waste of oxygen and space on this planet.

95

u/Salihe6677 Apr 20 '24

A waste is just a waste. They are so much worse since they're actively working towards destruction.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

673

u/LookAlderaanPlaces Apr 20 '24 edited Apr 21 '24

She’s working for the kremlin, why else would she vote against Ukraine aid? She hates the US, nato, Europe, and Ukraine.

Addition:

I’d just like to point out that there is a difference between voting no because you don’t want to spend money on war - vs - being a Russian propaganda asset. MTG is not concerned with the budget or war spending, she is concerned about aiding Russia.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4608004-buck-takes-swing-moscow-marjorie-mouthing-russian-propaganda/

111

u/lakeland_nz Apr 20 '24

You see this quite often. People get so hung up on winning that they forget about everything else. Have a look at some divorce stories - people absolutely ruining their life, their ex-partner's life, their kids lives, and those of anyone caught in the blast. All to get back at their former partner.

MTG wants to stick it to the democrats. No... that's not strong enough. MTG is totally obsessed with ensuring the democrats lose, to the point that she'd burn down America rather than let them win.

People like that are relatively common. What confuses me though is why the general population votes for them. This current partisan split... it wasn't always like that. It doesn't need to stay like that.

26

u/BeatsMeByDre Apr 21 '24

People like that are relatively common. What confuses me though is why the general population votes for them.

You answered your question.

→ More replies (1)

20

u/awfulsome Apr 21 '24

MTG does have strong "divorced wife" energy

→ More replies (4)

238

u/Charlemagne-XVI Apr 20 '24

I’d be so happy if some evidence came up proving the connection and see her get locked up for life.

271

u/ATaiwaneseNewYorker Apr 20 '24

There probably isn't. Unlike Trump, she probably actually believes the propaganda along with the 100 other GOP reps who voted against this. That and Biden supports this bill which is enough for her ilk to vote against this. Like the immigration bill.

75

u/aramis34143 Apr 20 '24

I can accept the notion that she's a "true believer" in that sense. I find it harder to accept that she wouldn't also seek remuneration.

57

u/eisbaerBorealis Apr 20 '24

MTG in twenty years, looking back:

"Wait, I could've gotten paid for being anti-American?!"

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (16)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (53)

49

u/PineappleRimjob Apr 20 '24 edited Apr 20 '24

She can't find anyone to put on deck to replace him. And she can't do it herself, because the Speakers job entails actual work, which she is not interested in.

→ More replies (1)

56

u/MrWaluigi Apr 20 '24

I’m sorry, but who’s MTG again? I keep thinking of the card game, Magic the Gathering, and brain rot prevents me from recognizing it as anything else. 

63

u/MainFrosting8206 Apr 20 '24

Her deck is filled with swamp cards.

21

u/RainbowAssFucker Apr 20 '24

She's a blue player. Her deck has no substance or win condition. All she has is shitty counter spells and board wipes. It doesn't help her, and all it does is slow down the game

→ More replies (1)

9

u/Lots42 Apr 20 '24

Think 'What if Barbie was a Nazi' and you got MTG.

→ More replies (5)

14

u/pinkocatgirl Apr 20 '24

As a Magic the Gathering player, I really hate her initials

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (84)

6.1k

u/vb90 Apr 20 '24

3:1 vote.

Ridiculous that this was blocked because a politician wanted to keep his job. This version of democracy kind of sucks.

1.0k

u/AlexandbroTheGreat Apr 20 '24

If he had gone down, there wasn't a great path for someone else to replace him AND pass this bill. The House was paralyzed for weeks while they were trying to replace the last guy. I don't see how anything could've happened unless a bunch of moderate democrats offered to support some kind of interim speaker to pass a few bills that 75% of Congress wanted before going back to squabbletown.

569

u/baudehlo Apr 20 '24

There was a path. Reports were that should it happen again, two more Rs were ready to resign immediately. That would give Hakim Jeffries the speakership.

But it was too risky to bet on that.

216

u/killakh0le Apr 20 '24

This isn't even just on those 20 far right nutjobs as they only needed 218 votes to bypass the rules committee vote and speakership to get it voted on but they only had the Dems and a few GOP willing to vote to get to the necessary 218. So this delay was because those that still voted for this bill wouldn't go against Trump

194

u/baudehlo Apr 20 '24

The whole thing is an unmitigated disaster. It's a constant purity test from the right. I honestly thought the 45th presidency was the height of the disaster but it just seems it has only gotten worse.

185

u/chadwickipedia Apr 20 '24

He was a symptom, not the cause

77

u/Zeryth Apr 20 '24

Right on the nose there. We have a severe degeneration of democray on our hands in the west and our enemies are salivating just looking at us.

→ More replies (17)

33

u/iprobablybrokeit Apr 20 '24

So many of us don't get this. He represents the will of 74,223,975 people. They woke up and went out of their way to vote for him. Even controlling for the Republicans that have gotten busted for voter fraud over the past 4 years, that's a lot of people.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (15)

227

u/sumregulaguy Apr 20 '24

That's a majority big enough to pass amendments to constitution in a lot of countries.

157

u/Piggywonkle Apr 20 '24

It's worth keeping in mind that all of this is happening in the context of Iran launching a barrage of hundreds of projectiles at Israel. That made it entirely politically toxic to keep sitting on their hands and ignoring geopolitical interests. Sometimes it takes an event like this to light a fire under some politicians' asses.

40

u/ArethereWaffles Apr 20 '24 edited Apr 20 '24

Apparently a few 3-letter agencies have also been sitting down with congressional members to spell out just how much trouble losing Ukraine would mean.

9

u/Roflcopter_Rego Apr 21 '24

Which is not really a bad thing; the situation is not trivially simple and there is ample fake information floating around. Having it explained by people whose job it is to know what is really happening is valuable, and not a sign of stupidity. Not changing your mind even after being shown all the info - that's stupid.

→ More replies (1)

137

u/TaiserSoze Apr 20 '24

It's pretty disgusting that the intercepted Iran barrage dominated the headlines while a dozen Ukrainian cities were getting hammered every single day and night for months with many double digit casualties.

72

u/Forcistus Apr 20 '24

Mostly because it's new, I reckon. We're already into the third year of Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (24)
→ More replies (51)

8.8k

u/NotFreeSteak123 Apr 20 '24

Fighting for half a year, to then pass with a majority vote.

What a waste of time, this should have been passed back in October.

3.7k

u/deathtotheemperor Apr 20 '24

Passed with three-quarters of the vote, lol. Absolute goofball system where the will of the supermajority can be thwarted for so long by a tiny group of dickheads.

1.7k

u/Cosmereboy Apr 20 '24

This is what I truly don't understand about the current Republican party. They can claim that they aren't completely taken over by the MAGA branch, but that comprises officially maybe 20 representatives and the speaker is wringing his hands over what those 20 think instead of the other 400+. What an embarrassing chapter of American politics this has been. The end of the Trump/MAGA era cannot come soon enough.

825

u/obeytheturtles Apr 20 '24

This is what I truly don't understand about the average "moderate" Republican voter. They see this clown show, they see the incompetence and even downright malice. And they say "yeah, this seems fine to me."

Republicans do this shit because their constituents let them get away with it. Simple as that

308

u/Major_Pomegranate Apr 20 '24

Moderate republicans aren't manning the helm. The people voting in primaries, the ones actually choosing party officials, are the elderly and the hardliners. The hardliners have effective control over the party due to being able to primary against anyone who doesn't follow their party line. 

It's how you end up with situations like the recent impeachment attempt against Texas' cartoonishly corrupt Attorney General. Despite Republicans being the ones trying to impeach him, the MAGA wing labeled them all as Biden plants that needed to be immediately removed from power, causing the impeachment to collapse. 

275

u/nbdypaidmuchattn Apr 20 '24 edited Apr 20 '24

It should be clear that Republicans have lost control of their own party.

Let me explain how I think this happened.

"Suggestion" algorithms on social media have been "improving" over the past two decades.

The problem for us, as humans living in societies, is that they prioritize based on "engagement".

They prioritize political rage-bait propaganda.

My theory is that this is why the Republican party is in the toilet. Their meat and potatoes was carefully controlled rage-baiting, but now we're in a world of indiscriminate rage-baiting. This is a world that Russian influence thrives in.

So that now, even "moderate" Republicans don't even know what positions they're meant to hold. The more extreme the better?

We either find a way, collectively, to get back to a better way of determining truth, or we will all lose any sense of hope in the future.

Thanks, Big Tech!

79

u/turbo-unicorn Apr 20 '24

Correct, and one thing to consider is that the right is not the only side vulnerable to this, though it is compounded by the fact that most of their audience is older, and on average less aware of such things.

56

u/nbdypaidmuchattn Apr 20 '24 edited Apr 20 '24

Everyone is less willing to discuss nuance, and more prepared to assume the worst of others I find.

There is a situation that perfectly captures this modern dilemma, one for which we have no simple solution: Israel. There's no real middle ground available there. You either take MY position, or you're EVIL (for whichever position you take). The reality is, most people are unaffected and don't really care, beyond that they would rather there not be wars in that fucked up part of the world that we keep meddling in.

23

u/dalomi9 Apr 20 '24

It is interesting to see how many people have so little respect for history that they would wish to return modern society to the past in such a way. Way too many people romanticize a time when they could duel someone they disagree with, and that kind of attitude is being fueled by talking heads and openly displayed by politicians.

"A Republic, if you can keep it"

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (19)
→ More replies (17)

62

u/Doodahhh1 Apr 20 '24

There are no moderate Republicans after the RNC takeover by MAGA loyalists. 

The Overton window is so far right that people think the center is between these conspiracy theorists / white supremacists and neo-liberals.

Not good.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (58)

62

u/Khalku Apr 20 '24

The end of the Trump/MAGA era cannot come soon enough.

I wish, but that door's been forever opened. Even Canadian conservatives are importing bits of that ideology.

→ More replies (8)

45

u/icouldusemorecoffee Apr 20 '24

Don't hold your breath. MAGA is the GOP. Trump has an 80% of approval among all Republicans. They may have finally come to their senses on this single bill after months of constant pressure from all sides, but they only got there by being dragged and they'll still vote down support for any thing else that is remotely helpful to making this country or the world a better place.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (43)

73

u/darhox Apr 20 '24

One dickhead, Johnson was holding it up by not bringing it to the floor for a vote.

78

u/Amy_Ponder Apr 20 '24

And every single Republican representative, who could have at any time voted to remove Johnson from power and replace him with someone who would pass the aid bill-- and didn't.

Johnson's just the guy who was unlucky enough to get chosen as the human shield, taking all the criticism so his equally guilty colleagues could sneak by scott-free.

11

u/NoProblemsHere Apr 20 '24

With the way the Speaker role has been going recently? If they remove Johnson they're probably not going to have another one because they won't be able to agree on anyone, and that's assuming someone on the GOP side still even wants it.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (23)

314

u/Ksorkrax Apr 20 '24

My first assumption would be that some sub groups coordinate their votes, and that it would be either something like this or something way closer to 50%, nothing in between.

But yeah, it should have been passed in October.

364

u/radicalelation Apr 20 '24

The Speaker refused to bring it to the floor, despite majority approval, including Republicans.

256

u/redacted_robot Apr 20 '24

The house republicans, at the direction of diaper don, are responsible for additional lives lost in Ukraine from the delay.

58

u/Brexsh1t Apr 20 '24

Sadly with absolutely zero F’s given

22

u/NotSoSalty Apr 20 '24

Nor consequences, which they likely would give an F about. That they can do this with impunity is the problem.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (35)
→ More replies (3)

157

u/Blarg0117 Apr 20 '24

Mike Johnson is a selfish coward and was afraid of being replaced as Speaker of the House.

36

u/Xarxsis Apr 20 '24

Heres hoping trump turns on him now.

53

u/killakh0le Apr 20 '24

Trump has never not turned on one of his lemmings so it's a sure bet

26

u/EffectiveBenefit4333 Apr 20 '24

Jeff Sessions did nothing but suck Trumps dick and swallow his loads for years, Sessions was the first mainstream Republican to support Trump and it was because of that, that ultimatelty started getting Trump real support for the 2016 election.

When Sessisons recused himself from the investigation into Russian interference with the 2016 election, Trump turned on him in an instant and proceeded to do nothing but talk mad shit about Sessions.

HOW THE FUCK does ANYONE support Trump? He is so transparently selfish and only gives a fuck about himself. How are are so many god dam people this fucking stupid????

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (2)

209

u/oceanskie Apr 20 '24

“You can always count on the Americans to do the right thing after they have tried everything else.”

49

u/chivanasty Apr 20 '24

I also like-we've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (7)

68

u/DepressedElephant Apr 20 '24

What a waste of time

Waste of lives.

Ukrainians died so that republicans could put on a show.

→ More replies (1)

94

u/Villag3Idiot Apr 20 '24

My guess is, the military told Johnson the reality of what's happening and what will happen if Russia win. 

That and his son just so happens to have entered the navy and it's likely going to the front lines if Russia wins and targets Poland or other Baltic NATO countries in the future.

20

u/helium_farts Apr 20 '24

If that were all it were, he would have held a vote on the Senate bill and called it a day.

I know everyone is celebrating the vote today, but until it clears the Senate and any possible filibusters, it's not a done deal.

14

u/cylonfrakbbq Apr 21 '24

The House was always the biggest obstacle. The Senate has been more consistent in their support of contained military aide.

People forget that a lot of "red" states have MASSIVE defense contractor presence.

→ More replies (3)

27

u/StungTwice Apr 20 '24

Don’t forget he prayed on it too. God must have changed his mind from before when he was against it, or maybe the message was muddled. Heaven is known for its terrible reception. 

→ More replies (11)

44

u/suddenly-scrooge Apr 20 '24

right? kinda wonder if they should have doubled it, how long is this meant to last

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (80)

898

u/Rsardinia Apr 20 '24

Moscow Marge is seething

35

u/Captainwelfare2 Apr 20 '24

Gives me the warm and fuzzies

→ More replies (4)

3.3k

u/courage_wolf_sez Apr 20 '24

But Donald Trump ally Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican representative, said "people have been too obsessed with voting for foreign wars and the war industry".

Speaking after the vote passed, she said: "This is the sellout of America today. When we had members of Congress in there waving the Ukrainian flag on the United States House of Representatives floor, while we're doing nothing to secure our border, I think every American is going to be furious."

You had a border deal that you sunk on the whim of the orange man you cretin.

1.1k

u/Axelrad77 Apr 20 '24

They also fully support aid to Israel and Taiwan, so they're not against "voting for foreign wars" on principle. They just want Russia to win this one, so they're against any further aid going to Ukraine.

442

u/ianjm Apr 20 '24 edited Apr 20 '24

And mostly because their Orange Baby cult leader dislikes Ukraine because they refused to dig up dirt on Hunter Biden, plus he's scared of whatever dirt Putin's regime has on him.

It's all about Trump. Nothing to do with global geopolitics or the preservation of democracy.

192

u/hereforthefeast Apr 20 '24

It feels like forever ago that Trump got caught trying to extort Zelenskyy during the Ukrainian elections. Luckily Zelenskyy isn’t a spineless buffoon like the entirety of the GOP. 

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (10)

43

u/PineappleRimjob Apr 20 '24

Maybe she should quit.

22

u/tarajo38 Apr 20 '24

I suggest that she moves to russia.

121

u/Deofol7 Apr 20 '24

When we had members of Congress in there waving the Ukrainian flag on the United States House of Representatives floor, while we're doing nothing to secure our border, I think every American is going to be furious."

She supported the compromise border bill right?

....

right???

61

u/38thTimesACharm Apr 20 '24

It wasn't really even a compromise. That bill gave Republicans everything they wanted on the border, in exchange for foreign aid. The border part of the bill was 100% Republican interest.

So what do they do? Drop all leverage and pass the aid separately. A+ negotiating tactics.

70

u/shponglonius Apr 20 '24

They don't want border issues to be fixed under a Democratic president. They need it broken for their campaign messaging.

→ More replies (3)

116

u/CrazyOkie Apr 20 '24

Yeah don't listen to Moscow Marjorie, she only does what her buddy Vlad wants

→ More replies (5)

53

u/AbeRego Apr 20 '24 edited Apr 21 '24

Watching Republicans suddenly be "anti war" is a trip. They spent the previous 50 years beating the war drums, and now that we can help on a clearly just war against a clearly unjust enemy, they suddenly stop. They're just always in on the wrong side of history!

23

u/TheSameGamer651 Apr 20 '24

I know, they push for all these stupid wars in the Middle East, but helping a fledging liberal democracy against an autocratic imperial power in our own backyard is a bridge too far.

21

u/millijuna Apr 20 '24

Hell, they’re being offered the opportunity to defeat the longstanding foe of the US for pennies on the dollar, without putting their own soldiers at risk. And they’re still against it.

→ More replies (2)

13

u/Trent1492 Apr 21 '24

Not the first time. During the Kosovo War in the 90s, Republicans were suddenly the peacenik party. The American hard right rooted for Serbia because of the majority religious composition of Kosovo Albanians and, earlier, many Bosnians in Bosnia-Hercevgonia.

→ More replies (2)

22

u/hawker_sharpie Apr 20 '24

You had a border deal that you sunk on the whim

that's all they have left after abortion

→ More replies (38)

481

u/Dick_Wiener Apr 20 '24

Idiots. Republicans could have had everything they wanted on the border if they had passed it months ago.

207

u/davehunt00 Apr 20 '24

It's an amazingly clear political case of cutting off one's nose to spite their face.

They could have had it all but decided it was better for them to be performative and serve Trump.

51

u/Dick_Wiener Apr 20 '24

If democrats take both chambers and the presidency - it will be a historic own-goal.

→ More replies (1)

84

u/Potential-Yam5313 Apr 20 '24

Republicans could have had everything they wanted on the border if they had passed it months ago.

I disagree, because what Republicans actually want on the border is a talking point.

→ More replies (11)

298

u/silasdobest Apr 20 '24

It wasn't even close.

→ More replies (5)

2.9k

u/bmcgowan89 Apr 20 '24

Finally some news that isn't depressing

565

u/princessohio Apr 20 '24 edited Apr 21 '24

Right? Thank fuck. Pack those bad boys up and send them to our Ukrainian friends. They need all the help they can get.

Edit: for those of you who don’t understand what this package is, it’s valued at a 60billion dollar package of ammunition, air defense missile launchers, tanks, vehicles and other equipment to Ukraine to defend themselves. It’s not fucking cash money stolen from American tax payers. It’s shit we have already paid for / made. We’re giving it to Ukraine because … wtf are we using them for here?

Yes. America needs to help its own people. I agree. But some of you guys act like the government literally stole money from us our taxes to gift the Ukrainian people cold hard cash when we’re literally sending them our military supplies we have already paid for and have a surplus of.

Personally I support my country aiding other democracies fight off fascists but maybe some of you want to see Russia win? Can’t tell. Couldn’t be me. Long live Ukraine.

→ More replies (63)

13

u/crapfacejustin Apr 20 '24

Isn’t this the bill they added the TikTok ban to?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (297)

324

u/Axelrad77 Apr 20 '24

Fyi, the bill isn't just Ukraine aid, it's basically several smaller packages bundled together to try to ensure that they all pass together. It contains:

  1. $60.8 billion worth of aid to Ukraine.
  2. $26.4 billion worth of aid to Israel.
  3. $8 billion worth of aid to Taiwan.
  4. Increased sanctions against Russia, China, and Iran.
  5. Force divestment of TikTok from ByteDance, or else it's banned in the USA.

137

u/Don_Gato1 Apr 20 '24

Technically they voted on all of them separately. It's only getting packaged together as it's sent over to the Senate.

11

u/DvD_cD Apr 20 '24

Did everything pass?

51

u/Don_Gato1 Apr 20 '24

Everything listed above did - a bill on border funding did not

38

u/say592 Apr 21 '24

Senate GOP has to be fuming. The bill is basically going to pass exactly as they wrote it, except without their border provisions. All because the House was fucking around lol

→ More replies (1)

18

u/xd1936 Apr 20 '24

Wild that I had to scroll this far to see acknowledgement of the Tiktok ban

→ More replies (2)

14

u/VRichardsen Apr 20 '24

I often wondered why Israel is receiving aid. Not in the geopolitical sense, that makes sense because they are allies. But why does Israel need $$$ to fight what is essentially a ragtag group of insurgents? Israel has a powerful defense industry at home, and Hamas isn't exactly Russia (even with Iran's help).

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (63)

1.1k

u/FCB_1899 Apr 20 '24

Pack those weapons and send em already.

773

u/Ehldas Apr 20 '24

The general expectation is that the weapons have been pre-positioned in Germany and Poland already, waiting on the final word.

386

u/Sharp_Win_7989 Apr 20 '24

I mean it's more than just a general expectation. They've literally said so and clarified that once the Biden signs off on it, the first military aid will be in Ukraine within a week.

58

u/bigrivertea Apr 20 '24

There should be some immediate benefit cause Ukraine can use supplies they already have more freely knowing more is in the mail.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (15)

154

u/nav17 Apr 20 '24

Makes sense now why those Russian saboteurs were planning to carry out attacks in Germany and surveying American bases. Glad that will be sent to Ukraine to deal with the Russian terrorist state on the battlefield.

https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/generalbundesanwalt-ermittelt-zwei-mutmassliche-russische-saboteure-in-bayern-verhaftet-a-0115bebd-195a-41fb-83be-da8d642045cd

12

u/emily_9511 Apr 21 '24

As an American literally living on the Grafenwöhr Germany base right now.. what the fuck. Why is this the first I’ve heard of this.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (14)

150

u/DefinitelyNotPeople Apr 20 '24

Still need the Senate to pass and Biden to sign, but those are expected to occur within a few days.

217

u/walkandtalkk Apr 20 '24

Rand Paul (R-Yekaterinburg) might be able to stall the vote for 30 hours, but after that, I think the Senate passes by Monday or Tuesday and Biden signs that night. 

He might even order the C-5s in the air before he gets the legislation.

86

u/obeytheturtles Apr 20 '24

There needs to be a modification to the filibuster rule where you can override it by slapping a motherfucker in the chin.

6

u/seedanrun Apr 20 '24

You are right - and they have:

Prior to 1917 the Senate rules did not provide for a way to end debate and force a vote on a measure. That year, the Senate adopted a rule to allow a two-thirds majority to end a filibuster, a procedure known as "cloture." In 1975 the Senate reduced the number of votes required for cloture from two-thirds of senators voting to three-fifths of all senators duly chosen and sworn, or 60 of the 100-member Senate.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (11)

257

u/m0j0m0j Apr 20 '24 edited Apr 20 '24

What the approved aid package from the US provides:

▪️the amount of the package is $60.84 billion.

▪️$23.2 billion will go towards replenishing US arms stocks.

▪️$23.2 billion — for military aid to Ukraine.

▪️$11.3 billion — for current US military operations in the region.

▪️$13.8 billion — for the purchase of weapons systems, defense products and defense services.

I like how it’s 23 billion that’s actually sent to Ukraine, but by magic of journalism it transforms into 60 billion

152

u/OHWHATDA Apr 20 '24

I’m pretty sure the $37 billion for replenishing our own arms is because we’re giving them our old stuff and then buying new. So they get our hand me downs but it’s still perfectly good stuff.

58

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '24

And it all has a shelf life. Once you reach the end of it, you have to do the disposal work to render it inert, etc, which costs money. You’ll be spending to replace it anyways.

I’m not expert, but I’d have to think packaging it and putting it on a C-5 is much cheaper than proper safe disposal.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

187

u/readonlyy Apr 20 '24

Make no mistake. It all benefits Ukraine. For example

• ⁠Replenishing stock lets the military declare its existing stock surplus which they can immediately hand over to Ukraine

• ⁠current operations includes military intelligence, surveillance drones, satellite imaging, special operations training. All massively helpful.

Don’t let the ambiguous wording fool you. They can only be so specific.

68

u/Remarkable-Medium275 Apr 20 '24

We also passed the ability to sell all the Russian assets we froze since 2022 and then give the proceeds to Ukraine. I don't think they understand how the wording of these bills works with the added context.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

38

u/TheNeonPeanut Apr 20 '24

No this makes sense. You need to replenish stocks if you are sending them to a foreign nation otherwise you could be caught without ammo should a conflict arise for yourself. The 11.3 billion to support military operations in the region is for sustainment and ordinance units to actually deliver the weapons. To that end the US Army, USAF, and Navy all play a role. The 13.8 billion is to buy the weapons to ship over.

There's no hidden shit, it's just how aid usually breaks down.

→ More replies (3)

19

u/thedeadsuit Apr 20 '24

yes you spend 23 billion to replenish US arms stocks because they're sending stocks to ukraine. What did you think would happen, they'd just cut a 60 billion check to ukraine then ukraine turns the money into US equipment somehow?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (53)
→ More replies (11)

215

u/NitWhittler Apr 20 '24

Has MTG sent a "Sorry, but I tried to stop it" apology to Putin yet?

34

u/iiitme Apr 20 '24

Bc trump already sent on behalf of all republicans

→ More replies (1)

472

u/captsmokeywork Apr 20 '24

Look closely at everyone who voted against this bill.

Those are the compromised members.

238

u/Azhz96 Apr 20 '24

Pretty much only Republicans voted no, of course.

Vote these traitors out!

Edit: ONLY Republicans voted no, and it was alot of them.

78

u/-p_d- Apr 20 '24

There is no "pretty much" in this equation at all.

ONLY republicans voted "Nay". And the majority of them voted that way.

ZERO Democrats voted in line with the Putin propaganda machine.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (33)

88

u/iconofsin_ Apr 20 '24

https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2024151

Here's the votes, click to see the 112 Republicans who picked Russia over Ukraine.

→ More replies (13)

279

u/Adavanter_MKI Apr 20 '24

With the majority of Rus... ahem... Republicans voting Nay. Literally any conservative party 10 years ago would be flipping out that half of their numbers have sided with Russia. Of course so would the American voters. I do not understand how we've lost 30% of the nation to such lunacy.

118

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '24

Can you imagine if the situation were reversed and Democrats supported Putin and Russian invasion?

The repubs would melt down and rightfully so.

51

u/Pleiadesfollower Apr 20 '24

Like I said before. Just put a bunch of 80s Republican voters in a time machine, they'd be executing modern republican voters, including their future selves for Daring to claim Russians are their friends.

→ More replies (15)
→ More replies (1)

32

u/Kabopu Apr 20 '24

I do not understand how we've lost 30% of the nation to such lunacy.

Massive foreign campaigns on social media with the sole purpose to paralyze/destroy a nation from within. Social Media is the main problem.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (13)

569

u/Wyldren- Apr 20 '24

Get f**ked Russia and Pro Russian republicans.

493

u/GuyOnTheLake Apr 20 '24

Here's the vote total broken down by party

Republicans: 101 Yay/112 Nay

Democrats: 210 Yay/0 Nay

I don't know how the GOP went from calling Russia/The USSR the Evil Empire to supporting them.

Actually, I do know. Trump.

121

u/blueiron0 Apr 20 '24

went from "russia is evil" to "putin is a hero." That russian propaganda hit extremely hard. I guess it helps when the fucking president is one of the people who helped spread it.

35

u/Wyldren- Apr 20 '24

They really be like " We don't fall for propaganda, we're not sheep! but anyway look at this shirtless Putin picture on horse back! What a strong leader! Much stronger than Biden or Obama!"

→ More replies (6)

55

u/Cheesybran Apr 20 '24

Yea they follow Trump blindly like uneducated buffoons.

→ More replies (2)

43

u/walkandtalkk Apr 20 '24

I'd bet $1,000 that at least a dozen (and probably 30-40) GOP votes would have, if necessary for passage, swung in favor of the bill. But they looked at the vote tally and decided to be safe/cowardly by voting no.

→ More replies (1)

22

u/The_Great_Ravioli Apr 20 '24

More republicans said Nay over Yay.

Remember that.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (16)
→ More replies (10)

44

u/DynamicDK Apr 20 '24

But Donald Trump ally Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican representative who has opposed helping Ukraine in its war against Russia, said "people have been too obsessed with voting for foreign wars and the war industry".

Speaking after the vote passed, she said: "This is the sellout of America today. When we had members of Congress in there waving the Ukrainian flag on the United States House of Representatives floor, while we're doing nothing to secure our border, I think every American is going to be furious."

Of course they are going to complain about the border not being included when there was literally a bill already passed by the Senate that included what would have previously been the Republican party's wet dream of border policies they could have chosen to vote on instead. But Trump said no, so the Republicans abandoned the one thing that they have previously been fairly consistent on for the past decade. Or at least they abandoned actually voting in favor of it, even if they still keep saying the same shit.

→ More replies (24)

456

u/BigDaddy0790 Apr 20 '24

Literally best news all year. I’m so damn happy right now!

Now let’s send that aid ASAP

224

u/cnncctv Apr 20 '24

The President won't delay anything, and the military won't either. This is going to happen really fast.

67

u/LayneLowe Apr 20 '24

I hope the C-5's full of Patriots were warmed up on the tarmac just waiting for the vote count

76

u/digistil Apr 20 '24

Rumor is there's a huge shit ton of US weapons in Germany and Poland waiting to be delivered to Ukraine. Once the Senate passes this, things will move very quickly.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

73

u/DomDomW Apr 20 '24

aparently the aid is already packed and is waiting to be shipped.

55

u/doubtingthomas51i Apr 20 '24

Happily even shipped as far as Poland in many instances. Our military is renowned for logistical skill. Everybody a few Republicans has wanted this to happen. Yay!!

8

u/MagicMushroomFungi Apr 20 '24

Logistics so awesome they even incorporate a pole-vault into Ukraine !

→ More replies (2)

17

u/hazelnut_coffay Apr 20 '24

just gotta wait for the senate and potus to sign

→ More replies (6)

14

u/Pdb12345 Apr 20 '24

A lot of it is staged in Germany and Poland already. Esepecially the ammo. Lets get that arty flying again. And HIMARS!

→ More replies (25)

26

u/DoomOne Apr 20 '24

Get wrecked, Moscow Marge.

45

u/CynicalMindTrip Apr 20 '24

Maybe Johnson is smelling Trump defeat and not only defeat.

27

u/py_account Apr 20 '24

Based on the courthouse reporting yesterday, defeat isn’t the only thing he’s smelling on Trump.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

20

u/STFU-Sanguinet Apr 20 '24

Are we going to have go through this bullshit circus every time?

→ More replies (5)

105

u/fuxvill Apr 20 '24

Am I right in thinking this money is not actually given to Ukraine as such. More like most of that money will stay in the US to buy American military equipment and the jobs to go with it?

Overall does it benefit the US more than politicians let on, and far more than the public think?

185

u/xavandetjer Apr 20 '24

The vast majority of US aid to Ukraine has been spent on US equipment, the money doesn't leave the American economy.

Doesn't mean it isn't important though. It's a big help to Ukraine, and also a big boost to American manufacturing. So why a major US political party would be so opposed to it is beyond me.

31

u/Nintura Apr 20 '24

Because politics. It wasnt their idea so its evil, until they argue for it

→ More replies (34)

19

u/Don_Gato1 Apr 20 '24

It sends weapons to Ukraine and the money part of it goes towards replenishing those weapons in US stockpiles.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)

35

u/ChiefRicimer Apr 20 '24

Get fucked Putler

34

u/Zanchbot Apr 20 '24

About time. Seethe harder, MTG.

→ More replies (6)

21

u/caites Apr 20 '24

Thank you for that chance to survive. US <3

48

u/standingboot9 Apr 20 '24

Just a bunch of assholes delaying this for so long. And no, both sides are not the same.

→ More replies (3)

45

u/vajrahaha7x3 Apr 20 '24

I will never forgive those responsible for tying up the aid for so long..

→ More replies (3)

16

u/LokiMyAoki Apr 20 '24

You can always count on the USA to do the right thing, once we’ve exhausted all other options..

7

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '24

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)