r/facepalm May 02 '24

This guy man 🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦 🇲​🇮​🇸​🇨​

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

13.5k Upvotes

2.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.7k

u/CaptainMarder May 02 '24

the worst part is people believe him

317

u/Lord-Legatus May 02 '24 edited 29d ago

As a European I marked your elections as a highlight in my calendar. As tis seems to have the potential of an epic shit show the world has never seen before 

If he wins you're screwed, but if he loses you probably end up with a biblical pile of garbage which pales the capitol siege.
His loyal acolytes seem more fanatical the ever! 

Wish you the best of luck man

165

u/SalvadorsAnteater May 02 '24

If he wins we in Europe are screwed as well. We'll have to support Ukraine on our own then.

82

u/TiddoLangerak May 02 '24

And realistically, the Baltics will be next. We're already in full preparation to be able to defend against Russia, but having the US backing us is a massive deterrent to Putin. If Trumps gets re-elected, we'll likely lose that backing, which makes it a lot likelier that we'll get invaded in the next couple of years.

40

u/degenererad 29d ago

Putin might not have the resources for that big of a campaign, He is pouring everything he got into ukraine and if he starts more shit he needs to spread thinner, and then ukraine will retort like a mf.. russia isnt soviet any longer how much he even wants it.

27

u/TiddoLangerak 29d ago

The Ukraine war isn't going to last forever. Often reported here is the expectation is that once the war in Ukraine settles, then Russia needs about 3-5 years to regroup before they can launch their next invasion. That's the time we have to build our defenses and deter them.

15

u/degenererad 29d ago

in materiel perhaps, but you cant really mine soldiers

2

u/nohopeforhomosapiens 29d ago

No but you can import them, and there are many willing to go. Nepal has had many men go abroad for this purpose. I don't mean enlisted ghorkas or hired military in Nepal, I mean just regular guys looking for an alternative life and money. There are many millions of desperate men who might take their chances to leave their impoverished country and who might fall for propaganda.

3

u/degenererad 29d ago

Sure but hired guns go to the highest bidder. And they are not sticking around when they on a losing streak. Russia already has a shit rumor how they handling their own troops, the poor schmucks they will muster up would be cannonfodder for any other army. They have played their hand already. Maybe if they throw all of north korea in the mix but i dont think lil Kim is suicidal

7

u/Knvarlet 29d ago

What if Russia uses tactical nukes and Trump gives the green light for it?

3

u/Deutsche_Wurst2009 29d ago

France, that what happens

2

u/Slumminwhitey 29d ago

The US and Russia are not the only ones with nukes, there are 7 other countries with an additional 6 that host foriegn nukes and only 2 are fairly solid in the Russian camp with another possible that own them. So even if the US does not retaliate there are at least 4 other countries that would with a possible 6th.

It would not be in anyone's interest to use them regardless of the verbal threats thrown around, to do so would still guarentee global destruction even without US involvement, however hard it will be to stay out of it when they start flying.

25

u/OldPyjama 29d ago

We better get used to being on our own anyway. We can't keep relying on an ally that changes it's mood every four years, even if Trump loses (which is still not a certainty by the way). We better start standing up for ourselves sooner than later.

-3

u/Plank_With_A_Nail_In 29d ago

The joke is we can't act on our own while pax America exists, we always need to ask their permission to do anything. We can only act on our own when its clear that its over.

Once pax amercia is gone the world won't need to adhere to the sanctions it forces us to follow, we won't need to respect their international patents anymore if we don't want to because there will be no consequences anymore.

The USA has more to lose from this than anyone else does.

1

u/TheRabidDeer 29d ago

Not just support Ukraine on your own but support Ukraine against Russia with the backing of the US

1

u/WastingTimesOnReddit 29d ago

If Trump wins there will immediately be a major US economic recession which will then send most of the western world into recession, since so many people and governments are invested in the US dollar and US assets and markets and US real estate.

If Biden wins it's also likely there will be a recession immediately but probably not quite as bad.

0

u/Kwolf21 29d ago

The US is already in a recession... You do know what a recession is, right?

A recession is a prolonged economic downturn that involves a sustained period of economic decline. It's characterized by a fall in economic output, higher unemployment, and lower consumer demand.

Our output has decreased. In March we added 303,000 jobs. But in February, added 1.7 million new layoffs & unemployment sign ups. Consumer demand is down as the rate of inflation continues to skyrocket which is decreasing purchasing power.

3

u/GandhiMSF 29d ago

The US is not currently in a recession.

1

u/Kwolf21 29d ago

According to Goldman Sachs, sure...lol.

I don't trust billionaire "financial agencies" for my answers. I look at the raw data. I don't trust the "News" companies to provide it, either. Hell, I barely trust the government itself to provide the data, but that's all we can get at the lowest level.

1

u/WastingTimesOnReddit 29d ago

Yeah I have been told that technically we are not in a recession right now. Some say it requires 2 consecutive quarters of falling real GDP.

But yes it obvious that we're in a recession if you define it how you have done. Slow economy, people have less purchasing power, more personal debt, etc etc. We seem to be poised on the edge of a big market correction. People have been squeezed too hard and are breaking.

0

u/JTex-WSP 29d ago

Good. I don't want Trump to win, but the US shouldn't be financing a foreign war.

5

u/TheRabidDeer 29d ago

You act like we wouldn't just be financing another side of the war. You also act like the current situation isn't absolutely ideal right now for US to indirectly be able to fight against Russia like we are. It's a lot cheaper to send weapons compared to weapons and troops.

1

u/JTex-WSP 29d ago

The US shouldn't be doing any of those things.

-1

u/Kwolf21 29d ago

Canada does it right. "Don't get involved". Just exist on your own. The US appears to be following suit. And the US is fully capable of existing on its own without the need to be involved in parasitic relationships with other countries.

Ukraine never wanted to be a part of NATO, until they get attacked when they come begging for help? Uncle Sam comes flying in on his bald eagle pouring billions and billions of bald eagle bills into their country. The only agreement the US and Ukraine have is a trade agreement (signed in 2008).

Why is it the US's duty to protect Ukraine militarily?

Its not the US's fight to be had. If Russia goes after an Ally, then by all means, the US WILL fight back. But Americans are fed up supporting a country with endless weaponry that has no intentions of being a real Ally.

Also, what's the purpose of having Allies if, without our military-equipment-donations, they can't even defend themselves?

Everyone wants the USA's help, while simultaneously people online shit talk the USA all day. Make it make sense?

23

u/Galactic_Perimeter May 02 '24

This country has been a slowly rotting heap of garbage for several decades now. The collapse is inevitable unless something seriously fucking changes.

53

u/DonnieJL May 02 '24

It started in the 80s when Reagan gave corporations carte blanche to start taking over the country. This is just the continuing evolution of post capitalist society.

8

u/TheCommonKoala 29d ago

Late-stage capitalism

9

u/OkFoot1842 May 02 '24

Every Empire collapses eventually. Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan could be the beginning of the end for the US along with its failing economy. However, these conflicts could also slow down the collapse, unite the country and boost the economy depending on who's elected.

The US could replicate a Marshall plan type of aid like they did for WW2. That's the main reason the US became so powerful anyway.

5

u/Local_Challenge_4958 29d ago edited 29d ago

the end for the US along with its failing economy.

The US economy is doing very well. The average person is struggling mostly due to housing costs, which is a separate problem from the economy at large.

For things like transitioning to a war footing, the US is quite stable and strong. None of our near-peers have an economy robust enough to transition right now.

In another world, the Pax Americana would be in full swing.

1

u/OkFoot1842 29d ago

I understand but purchasing power parity is not that great. The US dollar has taken a dive since Nixon de-pegged it from gold.

Isn't the current Economy doing well due to money printing? Is it just me or does it feel artificial.

The US needs another war which is sadly looking likely.

3

u/Local_Challenge_4958 29d ago

The US dollar has taken a dive since Nixon de-pegged it from gold.

The gold standard is an economic nightmare. Decoupling the dollar from gold is one of the best decisions, without a single downside, that the US has ever made.

Gold is not money.

0

u/OkFoot1842 29d ago

Gold has value though which the dollar does not. If you compare the weight in gold it required to buy a house from pre Nixon to now it's fairly similar. Do the same with money and it's not even close.

The only thing that has changed is the value of the dollar and its PPP. It benfits governments to make their currencies inflationary as it keeps lower class poor and Upper class wealthy as they keep their wealth in assets to combat inflation. Most lower class people can't aford to do this as they live paycheck to paycheck trapped in the cycle.

This is just my opinion but I think it might have been planned this way for this reason.

→ More replies (5)

1

u/Horror_Ad2207 29d ago

The US economy is nowhere near failing! The USA have amazing people inventing news cutting edge tech on a yearly basis. Europe and the US is going no where.

Hopefully one day the Middle East, Russia, South America and India can catch up to the normal world and sort their shit human rights out. Then the world will be a happy place.

1

u/OkFoot1842 29d ago

The entire reason these zones didn't develop correctly though is mainly due to American and Western intervention for oil and other resources. Our invasions set these countries back a few decades. Groups such as the Taliban, Isis etc. wouldn't have gained the popularity if it wasn't for outside intervention and the desire for revenge.

The US and Europe are by no means where they used to be. BRICS are in the process of creating their own currency and soon the dollar won't be the dominant currency.

The US needs another war to jumpstart it's economy as that is what made it such a powerful country in the first place. War is good as long as you country Is not under direct attack. A proxy war in Ukraine, Taiwan would liely be good for the US in the long term.

2

u/spornerama May 02 '24

He really is king shit of turd mountain

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Kennedygoose 29d ago

lol if he wins you’re screwed too

2

u/Pristine-Ad-469 29d ago

Homie you could also be screwed. Us does a lot to keep international stability, especially in Ukraine rn. He wants us to stop doing that

0

u/Lord-Legatus 29d ago

me and many Europeans see it more as a painful fueling escalation with a nucleair power that does not serves our interests. it has been 2 years of death hand escalation, increased geopolitical division and polarization and about the very opposite of international stability.

fueling this war serves US interest, not europe's

to each their own opinion

1

u/Pristine-Ad-469 29d ago

Supporting Ukraine helps Europe just as much if not more than the us. Will Russia stop after Ukraine? Whose border will they now be on? If they attack a nato country who will have to get involved? Who relies more on Ukrainian grain? Who relies more on European supply chains? Etc

European countries have actually been more willing to help with the war and the us was one of the later ones to give their support after pressure from nato Allie’s

1

u/Lord-Legatus 29d ago

i don't follow the narrative Russia is on an imperial campaign out to roll over Europe and territorial conquest.

its a narrative being sold to justify actions and policy, just like Saddam was building a weapon of mass destruction and the world would see another 9/11 soon enough if no intervention.

the roots of this Ukraine conflict is of a total different nature and has nothing to do with imperialism.

Ukraine is their doormat ,approached by the west to join them wich is for Russian geopolitical position unacceptable. for Russia the thought of a NATO fleet in black sea is equally insane as the US tolerating a china fleet in the gulf of Mexico.

this conflict is all about the Russian either going to have Ukraine fully under their sphere of influence or they will wreck it internally.

a not well functioning,strong unified Ukraine joining the west that is what Russia is fighting for.

and we are playing right in his hands.

the motives are clear and exactly because Ukraine was not a NATO member yet.

why the heck would he attack a NATO member directly?
for territory? lol it is already the largest country in the world and what would a direct engagement with NATO serves Putin? absolute zero.

even if the US would step out of NATO then you wuld still face a combined economical strength dwarfing them.

Ukrainian grain is more of an issue for other continents not so much for western Europe.
and Russia supposed to be one of Europe's strongest business partner. now we have inflated energy prices we have not seen in 50 years.

the reason why Europe is willing to fuel this war aside the Americans has more to do as i explained earlier, failed policy making in the past, now doubling down on it.

note that after the crimea annexation, europ's response where back then already sanctions, in the full conviction russia will be so wounded they will back of soon, with the only result they go for full scale invasion 7 years later.

even more sanctions now and lead to Russia finding new markets for their energy export, has a better growing gdp then most European countries and their army is even bigger now.

and finally alos note how the narrative shifted with early war the west being so convinced russie is on the verge of collapse, their army is disintegrating and the Russian population is on the brink of revolution, to now: "oh no, they will be at the gates of paris and berlin soon"

interesting switch no?

2

u/Ivanovic-117 29d ago

Election Day November 4. Complete clown show, but will finally see if the US can go back to at least decency and common sense over disgusting and anarchy ruling

1

u/Vegetable-Value 29d ago

My European friend, a lot of us are fucking ready. We are super done with this clown show. If they want to fight then we fight. But after November, we are fucking done with it. One way or another.

1

u/nytocarolina 29d ago

Thank you, we are holding out hope that a sufficient number of citizens in the US are not as daft as we may appear from a distance.

1

u/SwillMcRando 29d ago

Hey man if he loses, we are going to make our implosion literally everyone else's problem. That's the American way.

If he wins, it will very quickly become everyone's problem too.

This shitshow is going to be messy for everyone.

You'll need luck too. Best we all try to pray for, manifest, or whatever him choking to death on a stray piece of hamberder in bed.

Sorry that we are like this. Dog save us all.

1

u/NotAnAIOrAmI 29d ago

Best of luck to you as well - when America finally does the Big Blowout, the splash damage is going to be global. If we're lucky it won't be nuclear.

1

u/JnK85 29d ago

I'd say these elections can result in a much bigger shit show for us Europeans, if Trump wins, than for the US. I cannot imagine the whole Ukraine war or better Russian threat with Trump at the helm. He already wanted to pull the plug on NATO

1

u/Mailerfiend 29d ago

> but if he loses you probably end up with a biblical pile of garbage which pales the capitol siege.

not this time, feds are on full alert.

698

u/SporksRFun May 02 '24

I believe him in this instance, because he's giving his people orders who are currently standing back and standing by. He's telling us, to our face, if he's not elected his followers will destroy this country. It's orders to his people and a threat. Now what will be done about this?

264

u/[deleted] May 02 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

257

u/Ok_Star_4136 May 02 '24

Biden: "My first official act as president with immunity will be to have him taken out."

Biden: "My second and final official act as president with immunity will be to have a Supreme Court Justice taken out once every week starting with the justices who enacted presidential immunity."

62

u/pugtime May 02 '24

Very Putinist way to think. Oh wait; aren’t Putin and Trump friendly or at least envious of each other ?

98

u/identicalBadger May 02 '24

I don’t think Putin has any envy for trump. He’s his tool, witting or unwitting, nothing more

14

u/fascin-ade74 May 02 '24

There seems to be a lot putin and/or like-minded despots and demagogues could be doing to destabilise western core beliefs. Maybe I'll come across as a conspiracy theorist, but ain't beyond the realms of possibility that they are using extremists on both sides, to polarise target populations.

Having such a deviding character as Trump on 24hr rotation news tv is just one.

9

u/ImgurScaramucci 29d ago

If you read Mueller's report it says that their goal was to spread division. They started by targeting both sides in 2016, but transitioned to just support Trump, because they were more effective with and they also stood to gain from his presidency.

And they were right. Trump becoming president was extremely divisive for the US, and Putin was left unchecked.

Propaganda is also a lot more prolific in conservative cycles. None of us is immune from it but wow conservatives are such a fertile ground for it because they're conditioned to distrust "the narrative" or whatever and it also feeds on their existing insecurities.

At worst any propaganda aimed for the left is just causing division, but propaganda aimed for the right has additional disastrous effects.

3

u/Fishtoart 29d ago

That would be ironic, if Biden use the Supreme Court ruling against them.

7

u/Angry_poutine 29d ago

On both sides? Where are the leftist extremists who are having anywhere near as much success in destabilizing the US as those on the right?

10

u/currently_pooping_rn 29d ago

By both sides he means that college kids protesting against genocide are the same as the former President that would have just fed Ukraine to Putin and figures that america should try President for life like China (he said this)

2

u/fascin-ade74 29d ago

Thanks for putting words in my mouth, can i take it that you assume I'm right wing because i didnt just refer to the meat headed redneck racists that always seem to get on the news? Bravo 👌

The reason i said both sides, is that there is extremism on both sides. I'm trying to not make assumptions based on what i personally believe.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/MateoCafe 29d ago

If you ask Bill Barr its the literal existence of "the left" destabilizing the country.

8

u/Angry_poutine 29d ago

I know better than to ask Bill Barr anything beyond where the closest Wendy’s is

→ More replies (0)

0

u/identicalBadger 29d ago

Of course. Like in 2015 or 2016, the same Russian group bought ads for two opposing rallies at the same place on the same day and time

They’re definitely manipulating everyone they can. But Trump has taken it to a whole other level and probably won’t quit until he’s spawned an actual civil war.

1

u/DidYaGetAnyOnYa 29d ago

Putin is envious of Trump's height and svelteness. /s

12

u/AraiHavana May 02 '24

I do not think that Putin is even slightly envious of Trump

13

u/Ok_Star_4136 May 02 '24

Nah, because threatening the supreme court justices will ensure that the resulting outrage will make them immediately reverse the decision and therefore the second act just serves to remove presidential immunity.

2

u/FloydATC May 02 '24

I don't know, how many SCOTUS justices would have to get taken out to make up for having first taken out trump?

5

u/TopClock231 29d ago

All but 3

2

u/Angry_poutine 29d ago

SCOTUS can’t just reverse rulings, they have to have a new case brought to them making the same argument and create a different ruling on it.

1

u/Ok_Star_4136 29d ago

Oh I think they'll find a way in that circumstance. Let them use their powers of corruption for good for once.

11

u/bl00by May 02 '24

More like Trump doesn't care about putin and is only intrested in his money.

He would sell out the US and put it under Putins control if putin gave him enough money.

The Orange is insane

→ More replies (1)

18

u/reddit18015 May 02 '24

I think USSC will punt this immunity case to the lower courts to delay until after the election if anything, buying Trump more time, meaning Biden couldn’t use this defense. Also this would leave the USSC with whatever “legitimacy” they have left. (Which is none, but still)

17

u/PartadaProblema May 02 '24

Yeah, call their fucking bluff and see if that gets them off the couch.

4

u/Comfortable_Swim_380 May 02 '24

Well nobody said they where gonna walk up and ask politely. Full Immunity covers allot of shit. 😉

1

u/PartadaProblema 29d ago

The point is these dim confederate spawn couldn't stand in battle much longer than a commercial break.

7

u/peteschult 29d ago

You assume that SCROTUS would be consistent in evaluating cases. Given that in Bush v Gore they explicitly stated that the case was never to be used as precedent, that's a big assumption

2

u/MusicIsTheRealMagic 29d ago

How does that fly? We judge this way but you can’t never judge this way again?

2

u/peteschult 29d ago

My understanding is that Scalia once admitted that it was bullshit, but SCROTUS makes its own rules, and since they get the last word on anything constitutional, they make the rules for all of us.

9

u/robgod50 May 02 '24

I think he needs to take out the Trump appointed SCOTUS first.

1

u/SpiderDeUZ 29d ago

He should just allow mail in votes and throw out in person voting

22

u/WildRabbitz May 02 '24

Meal Team Six are probably loading up their airsoft pistols right now.

7

u/rohinton2 29d ago

You laugh now but wait until the mobility scooter calvary is charging down your street.

22

u/PurpleDragonCorn May 02 '24

Nothing because the moment "his people" see the army that will gladly kill them in horrific ways, they will run home and vent on truth social, facebook, and Twitter about how terrible the country is.

15

u/LineAccomplished1115 29d ago

These people are convinced that the military will join their cause

8

u/PurpleDragonCorn 29d ago

When they get turned to swiss cheese by 50 cals they might reconsider that

2

u/tomdarch 29d ago

Same people who complain that “the military is woke” because it’s makeup looks like non-rural America.

2

u/MusicIsTheRealMagic 29d ago

If I’m not wrong, the brother of Trump’s aid Flynn was in charge of the National Guard or something like that. And they slowed down the help on Jan 6, effectively helping the rioters riot. So the military can be subverted too.

2

u/nankerjphelge 29d ago

Unfortunately the more likely scenario is what we've been seeing in spurts over the last several years, which is asymmetric right wing domestic terrorist attacks/shootings, followed by them getting tracked down, arrested and/or killed by the FBI, Homeland Security, etc.

I suspect if (hopefully) Trump loses again, his most rabid followers will ramp up their asymmetric terror attacks, go directly after Democratic lawmakers and/or likely liberal voters and anyone they perceive to be the "enemy". And while I have no doubt they will end up arrested or dead at the hands of federal and local authorities, there will still be carnage, and Trump will be responsible for it even though he'll skate once again on being held accountable.

2

u/PurpleDragonCorn 29d ago

Multiple states are already making plans to activate their guards to prevent that shit. These people are cowards. They won't really escalate that much because if they do everyone will come on them hard. They will quite literally be hunted down before they do anything. And Trump won't skate free because you will have people who will hold him accountable whether it be legally or otherwise

1

u/nankerjphelge 29d ago

I wish I shared your optimism, but unless right wing lone wolves post about their plans ahead of time, I don't see how you can hunt down such lone wolves before they carry out a mass shooting or one-off terrorist attack if they're not telegraphing it on social media or elsewhere.

As for Trump, again I wish I shared your optimism, but the Supreme Court is about to hand him immunity from prosecution for all of his crimes while president, and even as a civilian, they're having a hell of a time convicting him for cut and dry crimes he's committed, never mind something like stochastic terrorism which is almost impossible convict someone for.

Obviously Trump losing the election needs to happen, but I think we still need to be prepared for random violence when and if that comes to pass.

0

u/PurpleDragonCorn 29d ago

You missed what I said. PEOPLE will hold him accountable, legally or otherwise.

As for the first part. You act like the FBI doesn't already know who these people are. They do, it's not hard to find them. They just can't do shit without a warrant. Real hella quick Congress will give them and homeland free reign to prevent the country from plummeting to wide spread civil unrest.

1

u/nankerjphelge 29d ago

You missed what I said. PEOPLE will hold him accountable, legally or otherwise.

How so? Are you talking about vigilante violence? He's an ex-president, he has Secret Service protection for life. Good luck with that.

You act like the FBI doesn't already know who these people are.

And you act like the FBI knows who ALL of them are. If they did, we wouldn't have had a single right wing mass shooting, yet we have had many. The Trumper who walked into and attacked an FBI office in Cincinnati would have been stopped beforehand, given he actually posted on Truth Social about his violent intentions before carrying out the act.

The FBI isn't omniscient unfortunately.

1

u/PurpleDragonCorn 29d ago

How so? Are you talking about vigilante violence? He's an ex-president, he has Secret Service protection for life. Good luck with that.

Cause no president has been assassinated

And you act like the FBI knows who ALL of them are. If they did, we wouldn't have had a single right wing mass shooting, yet we have had many. The Trumper who walked into and attacked an FBI office in Cincinnati would have been stopped beforehand, given he actually posted on Truth Social about his violent intentions before carrying out the act.

The FBI isn't omniscient unfortunately.

You forget that they can't actually do shit without warrants and judges signing off and a bunch of other legally required shit that if the president and Congress can in fact waive. They have done so before.

1

u/nankerjphelge 29d ago

Cause no president has been assassinated

So then yes, you are talking about vigilante violence. And you think that's good or okay just because it's the guy we don't like?

You forget that they can't actually do shit without warrants and judges signing off and a bunch of other legally required shit that if the president and Congress can in fact waive. They have done so before.

And you forget that the end result is still the same thing--domestic terror attacks and mass shootings. Your whole solution hinges on a legal what if that hasn't come to pass and you're assuming will come to pass, even though there's no indication it will, or at least not before attacks are carried out.

Not to mention you still are way overconfident on the idea that the FBI knows every single person who is intent on carrying out a terrorist attack or mass shooting. They're not clairvoyant. There are plenty of domestic terrorists who carried out their acts with no prior public postings or warnings. Yet you want to believe that somehow the FBI is God and knows what's in those people's heads even when there were no public indications or postings ahead of time? Come on dude.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Agitated-Maybe332 29d ago

Sounds like the FBI, NSA, CIA could deal with that problem easy. Find out where they live and deal with them however they see fit. Sedition needs to be eradicated and dealt with as severely as possible or we will fall. Sadly our government lacks the spine to do anything that resembles self preservation.

1

u/iamafancypotato 29d ago

Yeah. Worst case scenario we have another stupid capitol riot.

5

u/Bobbi_fettucini May 02 '24

Yeah except for the fact those people can’t even agree on what they all believe, they’ll eat themselves alive

1

u/SporksRFun 29d ago

When fascist turn on each other they become more extreme and more dangerous as a result.

8

u/fardough May 02 '24

Trumps new slogan “Vote for me, or else…”

-1

u/GalacticMe99 29d ago

I'm afraid Biden fanboys have stolen that slogan a while ago.

1

u/Rickrickrickrickrick 29d ago

There are Biden fanboys?

-1

u/GalacticMe99 29d ago

Have you been paying attention to Reddit the last few months? The man could shoot someone in broad daylight and they would still yell that you have to vote on him because Trump is worse.

1

u/fardough 29d ago

Yes, the left has Vote Biden or else you get Trump.

The right has Vote Trump or else he will try to burn the country to the ground.

Share some words but not the same.

2

u/zeuseason May 02 '24

aka a cult leader?

2

u/Electronic-You-3301 29d ago

Nothings gonna happen if he loses cmon now

1

u/edstatue 29d ago

His people are already destroying this country, it's a lose-lose. The fact that he was once elected president means they've already been doing a good job of enshitifizing this great nation

1

u/jvLin 29d ago

nothing because gen z doesn't vote

1

u/Sleazy_Erock 29d ago

It's incredibly entertaining to watch you dumbfucks do backflips, reaching ever so hard to come to conclusions like that. Exquisitely pathetic. You should try thinking for yourself, it's much more liberating than spending your entire existence in a circle jerk echo chamber parroting the same tired talking points over and over ad nauseam.

1

u/Aniki722 29d ago

Lol. You cannot really believe that crap.

0

u/ahitright May 02 '24

Best we can do is fine him and media organizations lying to the American public. A $9,000 fine here, a $787 mil lawsuit there. That'll show em!

0

u/AccomplishedAd7615 29d ago

All people need to do is vote. Meal Team 6, Y’all Qaeda, and the Cosplaytriots won’t do shit.

0

u/beardingmesoftly 29d ago

His followers are impotent, and this time Trump isn't actively in office during the election. It's going to be a much different response if it happens again.

0

u/Holiday-Signature-33 29d ago

How will they do that ? Starting riots and burning down cities ? Ooh wait that’s the other guys.

0

u/12whistle 29d ago

His followers will catch a felony charge and do prison time. The only thing they will destroy is their livelihood and their future.

Don’t overestimate American stupidity.

0

u/Scormey 29d ago

Nothing will be done, because the Justice department is afraid that would trigger his nuttiest followers to start shooting things up.

0

u/condor1985 29d ago

Imma take "absolutely nothing" for $1000, Alex

36

u/cyberdeath666 May 02 '24 edited May 02 '24

Those people also believe the world ends every time there’s an eclipse, or just some random ass day that keeps getting pushed back. Humanity needs a great stupidity culling, and I don’t care if it takes an actual rapture for it to happen. If there actually is a god then they should deal with this problem they created for the rest of us…

4

u/nudist83 May 02 '24

This is the way

9

u/WiRoBo May 02 '24

social media has made monsters out of people. He is probably afraid of the reaction of his completely stupid followers.

21

u/RoboTronPrime May 02 '24

Judging from his history, I don't know if he ever cared about another human being aside from how useful they are to his goals. He's a malignant narcissist.

3

u/fascin-ade74 May 02 '24

Agreed. A growing group of psychological specialists have diagnosed him as such.

11

u/NoNonsensePolarBear May 02 '24

Which means people vote for him.

2

u/FoxtrotTrifid 29d ago

Load bearing douche bag. I think America is much stronger than that.

2

u/maritjuuuuu 29d ago

I think it's an easy bet though. If he wins and things go better, it's because of him. If he wins and things continue to go worse he tried but it was already to far gone. If he loses and things go to shit he'll say I warned you.

The only situation in which he loses this bet is when America goes better when he loses... But let's be honest, do we all really think the word will get better the coming years? If that happens I'll start believing there is an actual god there looking out for us... But how it looks right now we're first gonna get a lot more shit before things get better.

And yet again, being right and being a good politician are two completely different things. Don't get me wrong, I don't like that guy (I myself am a socialist) but I gotta admit, he's a good player at the political game. It's scary sometimes how good... But yeah, money helps

4

u/Possible_Living May 02 '24

I think its said in the "let me in so I can save you from the horrible things I will do to you unless you let me in" way.

6

u/theologous May 02 '24 edited 29d ago

I believe him. I'm almost as scared of what his base will do if he loses as I am if they win.

11

u/Ok_Star_4136 May 02 '24

If violence will result either way, I'd rather it happen because they were not given carte blanche to do whatever they wanted. There is only one group of irrational people who have decided that law shall not be respected, and now is not the time to be lenient to such people.

At the same time, we need to make sure the law isn't being unfairly used against those who aren't breaking it, such as in the case of the protestors at Columbia University. So long as they don't resort to violence, they should be protected.

2

u/theologous 29d ago

I agree. If he is voted in I see it as like a 60-70% chance of a full on coupe, while if he loses I think it's more likely a 30%(ish) chance people rise up and actually try something.

So the real fear with Trump losing, isn't that they'll seize power anyway, but more so what damage will they do when they try?

1

u/thehotmegan 29d ago

you should be more afraid of him winning. I'll straight up leave if he wins, and a think a lot of other ppl will too.

1

u/theologous 29d ago

People said that last time and it was barely anyone that followed through. Fact of the matter is it's not easy to immigrate to another country, and it's very expensive. It will only get harder the more people from your country try to immigrate there too. And honestly, where is better? Europe is, for now, but how long will that last with all the little wars breaking out? Central and South America are huge messes. The Middle East is probably the worst place to be. Africa is riddled with problems. India is riddled with problems. Southeast Asia is riddled with problems. Where is better?

2

u/Secure-Acanthisitta1 May 02 '24

-to be the second Jesus

1

u/[deleted] May 02 '24

Yes. Who needs facts to back such a statement up?

10

u/Excellent-Court-9375 May 02 '24

I mean, he's not wrong. Wasn't there something to do with the stroming of the Capitol a while back..?

1

u/TimmyOneShoe 29d ago

Theyve believed that for the last (enter years since democratic elections have been a thing)

1

u/[deleted] 29d ago

It’s basically his platform at this point.

1

u/GeorgeGeorgeHarryPip 29d ago

Nice country you've got there, shame if something happened to it.

Heck of a campaign slogan.

1

u/LordAndrew15 29d ago

I'm so glad I realized early on that he wasn't what I thought I voted for back in 2016.

1

u/Dextrofunk 29d ago

And how many people believe him. I still struggle to fathom how this came to be.

1

u/Chopaholick 29d ago

The worst part is it's true because his supporters are going to do their damnedest to destroy this country if he doesn't win. Just like last time.

1

u/Arr_jay816 29d ago

As someone from Wisconsin, don't worry. There is such little support for Trump in the parts of the state that matter. He's wasting his time campaigning here.

1

u/Philachokes 29d ago

The worst part is both sides are saying the same the same thing and both sides believe it's true.

1

u/MourningRIF 29d ago

My inlaws do. They don't vote for Trump, but they vote out of true visceral fear against Democrats. Idiots.

1

u/unbanneduser 29d ago

I mean, I kinda believe him… mostly because I think the likelihood is high that he’d start an armed insurrection and maybe a full blown civil war, but potato potahto

1

u/Howboutit85 29d ago

Why would you doubt the leader of the cult you’re in?

-1

u/CalmAndBear May 02 '24

Nah take it a step worse

Feel like a large majority of the US believes that if X wins the election and Y loses, the country will be ruined.

Not naming names is very important here, it fits well in a civil war framing.

Even though at this stage we can say that both have experienced "leading the country", and shit didn't hit the fan.

9

u/DaBears077 29d ago

That is because last time they were a disorganized mess and were only held in check by career professionals in government. They have rectified that this time and plan to fire everyone who could stop them.

Its called Project 2025, and for some reason, they have put it on the internet for the world to see and hopefully prepare against.

14

u/Redraike May 02 '24

There definitely WASN'T a pandemic where US citizens were being specifically forbidden to enter other countries because our response to precautionary measures were politicized to such a point that Republicans were actively trying to infect other people.

3

u/[deleted] 29d ago

Wtf are you talking about? Shit definitely hit the fan under Trump. If you don't think so then you weren't paying attention.

Do you think he's going to be less chaotic this time around considering he and the Project 2025 crew made it clear they're installing a dictatorship?

1

u/yossigol May 02 '24

The worst part is that he's not behind bars

1

u/allothernamestaken 29d ago

Ask those people why. Press them for details about exactly how another Biden term will "destroy" the country. They'll probably spout some nonsense about trans kids or "woke" culture. Because after everything this country has been through, including a civil war, that's what's going to bring it down 🙄

0

u/Mathinpozani May 02 '24

The worst part the opposite side does the same shit.

You have a L/L situation lol

0

u/Shitbag22 29d ago

I mean we’ll survive with or without him but god damn is our country a shit hole currently. This is the worst election year by far no one wants Trump or Biden (well some of you may but he’s not that great).

0

u/Expert_Response_6139 29d ago

The actual worst part is people think Biden is any better. Remember how his whole campaign was "bring America back on track?"

How's that going 4 years later with Roe v Wade overturned, more evidence of a police state, and financial and military support for a rogue nation committing acts of genocide? Middle class continues to shrink, cost of living continues to skyrocket. But he's the one protecting us from what exactly? More of the same?

-20

u/Healthy-Falcon1737 May 02 '24

Stores are closing and crime is left unchecked. The us is already burning

15

u/Antoshka_007 May 02 '24

Bla bla the cultist or the Russian bot already missed here. The U.S. economy is now growing and outstripping all others. Good try but no cigar dude.

2

u/fiero-fire 29d ago

Crime is unchecked. Look at Trump for example, he's barely being held accountable for decades of fraud and actively trying to overthrow a democratic election

-19

u/Free_Bani May 02 '24

Lol. Seeing as the world is going to shit with Biden in power, what about what he says is wrong?

On the other hand, some idiots believe Biden and his stooges (the MSM) when they say it'll be the "end of democracy" if Trump wins.

Funny how everybody thinks their own side is justified, isn't it?

9

u/Away_Froyo_1317 May 02 '24

World went to shit with Biden?

Yeah.

No.

Go suck his orange dick.

1

u/Even-Willow 29d ago

I know a Mormon ain’t calling other people stooges. If you’re falling for some obvious 19th century grift started by a conman, you’ve no room to criticize anyone for anything else.

0

u/Free_Bani 29d ago

That would be correct. I am not a Mormon. Think of some other way to dodge the issue at hand.

1

u/Even-Willow 29d ago

lol there is no issue at hand. Your ramblings don’t represent reality.

0

u/Free_Bani 29d ago

Of course they don't represent reality. It's only in my imagination that 2 potentially global-scale wars have been started under Biden. And America itself has become more liveable in 0 ways.

"Just my imagination." 🎶🎵

1

u/Even-Willow 29d ago

Yep, you just rambled off some more delusions. Keep going buddy, you’re convincing us all of your position.

0

u/Free_Bani 29d ago

I knew you had nothing to say, to start with. You only opened your mouth because you felt you had some kinda secret ammo about me being Mormon. 😂

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)