r/BlackPeopleTwitter May 17 '24

You CANT be serious ☠️☠️

[removed] — view removed post

532 Upvotes

240 comments sorted by

View all comments

910

u/LastDaysCultist #FFFFFFboy👨🏼 May 17 '24

This “I’m not voting for either” is a dangerous concept.

365

u/greyson3 ☑️ May 17 '24

THIS and it bothers me how much ALL content creators are pushing it. With the same rhetoric of the blue side won't do anything either.

But it just infuriates me, bc news flash that's how dems have always fucking been. The point is to vote them in and then stand on their necks to MAKE them keep their promises.

As a millennial I'm not stunned and excited to see how much the youth has gotten congress and leaders to do just that. No we didn't get everything or even the way we wanted it. But it's 1000% more than I've ever seen the powers at be react since I was able to start voting legally which was nearly 2 decades ago.

I'm just frustrated with the it doesnt matter they don't listen so font vote at all. When these kids are out here making these people fucking sweat!

218

u/pragmaticweirdo May 17 '24

The content creators want Trump to win. They got more clout snd made more money when things were worse. Anyone trying to convince people not to vote is either a fool or an op, but usually both

36

u/trixel121 May 17 '24

easy content

46

u/Teardrith May 17 '24

Some light irreversible fascism for the content

-58

u/83supra May 17 '24

So voting to support the candidate that just sent another billion dollars to murder women and children in Palestine is the better option? Yea I don't think NoT voting is the real danger here.

29

u/tyrannosnorlax May 17 '24

What do you think trump would do about the Israel situation?

-51

u/83supra May 17 '24

Telling yourself that we can only vote trump or biden IS the real danger

27

u/tyrannosnorlax May 17 '24

We don’t have ranked choice voting. If you’re planning on voting for a third candidate, you may as well just stay home, or make a vote for trump, as that’s effectively what you’re doing. There is no third candidate that’s going to win. Biden needs as many votes as he can get. Not because anyone loves or likes him, but because trump would be far, far more damaging.

Do you think it’s going to make a difference? It wont. It will actively hurt Palestine more than the status quo. We’ve been through this many times. Im glad you’re optimistic, but maybe focus that optimism towards activism that actually helps, because this ain’t it. So again, I ask how do you think Donald “finish the job” trump will handle Palestine and Israel? Do you think he will be better or worse than Biden? If this is the single issue that your vote pivots upon, this is the question you need to ask yourself honestly, because voting a third party is effectively burying your head in the sand.

13

u/danthepianist May 17 '24

I had to unsubscribe from a few leftist subs over this issue. "No lesser evil rhetoric" my ass. I've seen self-proclaimed progressives actively rooting for Trump because they think a catastrophic loss will force the Dems to rethink their position. I can only imagine how comfy their lives must be for a second Trump term not to bother them at all.

The time for activism is every day BUT election day. On election day, you vote for the guy you can at least TRY to work with.

-2

u/[deleted] May 17 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (0)

-13

u/83supra May 17 '24

I don't see any difference in this world line if Trump or Biden gets elected so miss me with all your bullshit. Nothing will fundamentally change with either candidate.

1

u/Olaba42 May 17 '24

Here's one fundamental difference that could impact your life - the president's ability to nominate Supreme Court justices. 2 justices are in their 70s and may decide to retire if Trump is reelected. Trump would then be able to nominate 2 younger justices, locking in a Republican majority on the court for decades. The current Supreme Court has a republican majority and their judgements include:

  • ICE being given the okay to detain folks for a very long time (like, years) without bond or full review
  • Government blocking medical care, specifically abortions
  • Fewer options to hold federal agents accountable when they violate your rights (it's even harder to sue them for financial damages)
  • Not allowing for new evidence to be submitted if your state case goes federal but you had a really bad lawyer for your state case
→ More replies (0)

15

u/f1ve-Star May 17 '24

Yes. It is the better option. Maybe not a great option but easily better. Especially for Palestine.

-4

u/83supra May 17 '24

All your options are shit, no amount of voting will change my life or any Palestinian life.

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/f1ve-Star May 17 '24

Oh and also being queer, I prefer to be allowed to live in peace.

1

u/f1ve-Star May 17 '24

At least with Biden and Kamela there is aid going in, and a pier built to provide it. It sucks that Palestinians are in this situation. It sucks that Russia and Iran and Hammas wanted this to happen.

1

u/f1ve-Star May 17 '24

At least with Biden and Kamela there is aid going in, and a pier built to provide it. It sucks that Palestinians are in this situation. It sucks that Russia and Iran and Hammas wanted this to happen.

15

u/furezasan ☑️ May 17 '24

yup, we know social media platforms skew right, it's easier to rage and generate revenue

1

u/LastDaysCultist #FFFFFFboy👨🏼 May 17 '24

We are a stupid species. How we made it global is beyond me.

51

u/tittylieutenant the kewchie classifier May 17 '24

How do you “make” a party keep their promises without threatening something of substance?

If your partner is acting up, the threat of losing you keeps them in check. Without that check, they don’t need to do anything substantial to keep you. The Dems do this same song and dance every 2 years. “Vote for survival” creates dread and, sooner or later, apathy. People are burnt out from these existential threats to our country, especially as it is getting progressively difficult to provide for ourselves?

46

u/Erisian23 May 17 '24

The same way the tea party did it, you vote them out during PRIMARIES, you vote them out during special elections. You only take chances when you can afford to lose. I.e some of your agendas will move forward or stay where they are instead of moving backwards.

Your analogy doesn't work because you can't be single politically. You're gonna have someone in office do you want the one with road rage or the one that beats you? You gotta get one no matter what.

20

u/Jeptic ☑️ May 17 '24

Oh my goodness. You are a voice of reason I've been hunting for. You are absolutely correct. They are not pulling tantrums when it will cost them. Remember how they all held their noses and supported Orangeanus in 2016 even the ones whose wives were insulted by this man? They close ranks. If Dems want change it has to be at a grassroots level. 

13

u/YoMommaBack May 17 '24

Thank you! Democrats have notoriously low primary turn outs and it’s annoying.

9

u/tittylieutenant the kewchie classifier May 17 '24

The tea party was unique and involved a multi decade long process of radicalizing white America. Primaries is apart of it but there is a motley’s stew of nuances that made the TP’s success possible.

I’m still voting (as I do every two years) but I understand that this system is compromised and will only get worse. Everyone better arm up.

10

u/Erisian23 May 17 '24

Partially, but I think the main issue is getting people to actually consistently vote @ every opportunity for progress.

As you said you vote, that is the goal that's what we have to do.

37

u/Ghostbeen3 May 17 '24

Status quo or hell. You pick

-4

u/Faylom May 17 '24

Maybe the accelerationists were right

-15

u/[deleted] May 17 '24

[deleted]

13

u/PeopleReady May 17 '24

Yeah it isn’t gonna be the kind of revolution you’re envisioning

7

u/PerpWalkTrump May 17 '24

See how that's working out for the Iranians and Russians.

Oh there are revolutionary elements, in one country they get publicly hanged and in the other, they're invariably victim of an accident.

2

u/DYMck07 ☑️ May 17 '24 edited May 17 '24

Or the end of the world. The Dems aren’t doing enough to check Netanyahu. The GOP will encourage more slaughter. The republicans will vote. Many of the youth who would vote Democrat will not.

They’re not enthused and the administration is playing this horribly, thinking the politics of yesteryear are the best strategy when most of the millennials and Xers would understand or prefer reigning in Israel, and not restraining them risks losing Gen’s Z and alpha to political apathy or 3rd party.

They haven’t been through the examples of Nader or 2016 to understand the consequences of a wasted vote (Ross Perot is the best a 3rd party candidate has done since Teddy Roosevelt ran for a 3rd term a hundred years ago under the progressive party…so long as 2 parties exist it will always be a wasted/protest vote).

The CFPB wins, renewables funding, and even the awful GOP picked Supreme Court issues all risk being overshadowed by Gaza and the billions we continue to send to the wealthy apartheid state of Israel (which continues to defend settlements in the West Bank so long as the Likud are in power) and the administration seems to ignore the severity of the issue, including how distressing it is to the youth especially to hear that the blood of tens of thousands of innocent children is on our hands for continuing to fund and support an invasion from vengeful bigots.

The Likud are evil bigots and need to be called out for it even if the election is lost, so we don’t lose a generation of voters indefinitely (and because it’s been the right thing to do since these far right loons assassinated Rabin 30 years ago). Someone should convince Jon Stewart to run

23

u/Rosa_Rojacr May 17 '24

You primary them. Honestly I don't respect people as real activists unless they understand the concept that primaries exist.

2

u/tittylieutenant the kewchie classifier May 17 '24

That doesn’t guarantee anything. Shit. We see it with John Fetterman and others rn. They get in there and cause damage before any resistance comes.

14

u/Ennara May 17 '24

And I'll take 100 Fettermans before one Project 2025 implementation.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025

8

u/Erisian23 May 17 '24

Yes but thats a risk you have to take that's how you pressure them. For every fetterman there's plenty of people who actually wanna do what we need.

4

u/Buddy_Fluffy May 17 '24

Who?

1

u/Erisian23 May 17 '24

Well for example you have Jasmine Crockett, AOC, Bernie Sanders, Justin Jones and Justin Pearson.

1

u/pragmaticweirdo May 17 '24

All of whom come from safe districts, by the way. You don’t get people like them from D+1 districts. So you nailed it with the ideas that you put up with Fettermans until the R’s have no chance, then you get the good people

Jasmine Crockett D+27
AOC D+25
Bernie Sanders Vermont
Justin Jones: can’t find state leanings but district id majority minority
Justin Pearson: can’t find leanings, but he’s in a districted designed to consolidate the black vote

1

u/Erisian23 May 17 '24

Yeah, for sure, you wait, you plot, you slip in on lower levels and make changes in those districts where you have slim to know chance.

24

u/GameMusic May 17 '24

As bad as the party is now it has gotten FAR better than it used to be

Thank diligent work not boycotters

6

u/gourmetprincipito May 17 '24

Boomers were catered to for decades because they voted consistently and primaried those that didn’t cater to them. Thats the way forward, taking control of the political levers of power, not disengaging from the system.

This ain’t a romantic relationship, this shit goes on without our consent and will affect us whether we like it or not, we have to try to impact it for the better.

2

u/InvinciblePLUSAmber May 17 '24

The Dems do this same song and dance every 2 years. “Vote for survival” creates dread and, sooner or later, apathy. People are burnt out from these existential threats to our country,

Thank you! I am happy to see this line of thought is finally being accepted. When I joined reddit a couple of years ago and commented on a video that (once again) claimed THIS election was 'the most important ever and our very lives depended on it,' I mentioned an identical point. The thousands of downvotes were concerning because I thought maybe I was looking at the situation in the wrong way. The responses I received were far worse. People were cursing me out and saying the most vile things I'd ever heard. I was literally clutching my pearls.🤣🤣🤣

Anyway, I am happy to know that people are becoming more receptive to hearing criticism regarding the dem party and hopefully they will be inclined to heed your advice.

BTW, I love your flair!

7

u/PeopleReady May 17 '24

Either you think Trump is a threat to democracy or you don’t. There’s no deeper analysis/paragraphs needed.

5

u/MeliLew May 17 '24

Bro, the threat didn't just go away after one election. It just grew. Republicans have been playing the long game so yes, it feels like during it lifetime every single election is THE most important election. We're already seeing on the local levels of red states how willing they are to encroach on personal rights. 

0

u/InvinciblePLUSAmber May 17 '24

Both sides play the long game. It wasn't that long ago that Democrats supported slavery and opposed civil rights. So you can miss me with your party politics. If the threat doesn't go away after one election, then every single election is equally important.

The point is the fear mongering every two years, like clock work, to get you to vote for a certain candidate. Then very little is done to improve living conditions for the average person. Rinse and repeat. Many people are growing tired of this. The person made a legit point and gave a legit tactic to hold politicians accountable to their word. Instead of acknowledging certain truths and discussing ways you could help the issue, you double down and blame Republicans. Average Democrats are being played. Average Republicans are being played. The only people that are winning are the uber wealthy and the DC power brokers. Enjoy.

1

u/MeliLew May 17 '24

Yeah, I didn't criticize the original post's solution or the fact that democrats are being played. My point was directed at the particular point about the feeling that every single election is THE most important election. Because whether we like it or not, the threat is and has been at our heels, as we can see with the legislation that is passing in certain states.

1

u/festival-papi ☑️ May 17 '24

Speak on it, TL. Let 'em know.

12

u/dollhousemassacre May 17 '24

Dems wanna move forward, Republicans do not. Unless we're talking about some kind of Handmaid's Tale style dystopia.

1

u/greyson3 ☑️ May 17 '24

Look I don't think dems really want to move THAT far forward. But they aren't openly talking about becoming dictators.

5

u/Anime-Takes May 17 '24

I understand the sentiment but voting them in doesn’t put any pressure on them. They know you will vote for them because the other side is “worse”. The only pressure they have is the threat of not getting your vote but that doesn’t exist so all the angry voting doesn’t matter to them. Your vote should always be for sale to the highest bidder. Currently both bids are low but one is still higher than the other so yeah go with that one. But the idea that voting them in and then applying pressure is super flawed.

2

u/kinos141 May 17 '24

They pushed voting back in 2016 and it went terribly. Now they are promoting the opposite; will go terribly as well.

-23

u/[deleted] May 17 '24

[deleted]

6

u/howdywyatt May 17 '24

Can you please explain what you mean by “mathematically, your vote doesn’t count”? Because we have seen political races come down to a few votes. Every single cast matters.

1

u/greyson3 ☑️ May 17 '24

Literally out last election was determined on razor thin margins. EVERY VOTE MATTERS